Experimental characterization of sub-pixel underwater optical camera communications

Underwater Wireless Optical Communication (UWOC) is a promising technology to enable underwater communications for exploring and monitoring marine activities due to its high bandwidth and low latency. Furthermore, underwater optical camera communication (UOCC) takes advantage of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and cameras already embedded in underwater devices (e.g., drones). In this work, a global shutter-based UOCC system is experimentally tested under a sub-pixel condition, where the dimensions of the LED in the image plane (in $\mu \mathrm{m}$) are smaller than a single pixel. Although the LED projection dimensions are less than a single pixel, the incoming light irradiance spreads over a limited image sensor area. The results reveal that a 2 m link with a bit rate of 8 bps per channel (24 bps in total) can be attained using an RGB LED as a transmitter and a digital camera as a receiver by applying the point spread function for the demodulation. The validation of this system in sub-pixel conditions guarantees the operation of long-distance UOCC links, where extensive LED sources are perceived as single points in the image. In addition, as the LED dimensions in the image plane are significantly small, the camera can effectively accommodate several transmitters, increasing the link throughput considerably.

[1]  Weipeng Guan,et al.  RSE-based optical camera communication in underwater scenery with bubble degradation , 2021, 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[2]  Weipeng Guan,et al.  Performance Enhancement Scheme for RSE-Based Underwater Optical Camera Communication Using De-Bubble Algorithm and Binary Fringe Correction , 2021, Electronics.

[3]  S. Zvánovec,et al.  Wireless Sensor Networks Using Sub-Pixel Optical Camera Communications: Advances in Experimental Channel Evaluation † , 2021, Sensors.

[4]  S. Zvánovec,et al.  Sandstorm effect on experimental optical camera communication. , 2020, Applied optics.

[5]  Jorge A. Holguin-Lerma,et al.  Survey of energy-autonomous solar cell receivers for satellite–air–ground–ocean optical wireless communication , 2020 .

[6]  Pengfei Tian,et al.  Recent progress in and perspectives of underwater wireless optical communication , 2020 .

[7]  Fabio Leccese,et al.  Underwater Optical Wireless Communications: Overview , 2020, Sensors.

[8]  Roshan Indika Godaliyadda,et al.  Design and analysis of an optical camera communication system for underwater applications , 2020, IET Optoelectronics.

[9]  Yang Weng,et al.  A Review on Practical Considerations and Solutions in Underwater Wireless Optical Communication , 2020, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[10]  R. Pérez-Jiménez,et al.  Correlation-based receiver for optical camera communications. , 2019, Optics express.

[11]  G.M.R.I. Godaliyadda,et al.  Camera based visible light communication system for underwater applications , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS).

[12]  Yeong Min Jang,et al.  A survey of design and implementation for optical camera communication , 2017, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[13]  Mark Rhodes,et al.  Underwater radio frequency communications , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[14]  D. Jayakody,et al.  Recent Trends in Underwater Visible Light Communication (UVLC) Systems , 2022, IEEE Access.

[15]  Koichi Mizutani,et al.  Optimal Modulation Technique for Underwater Visible Light Communication Using Rolling-Shutter Sensor , 2021, IEEE Access.

[16]  Shlomi Arnon,et al.  Underwater optical wireless communication network , 2010 .

[17]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Communication Channels: Propagation Models and Statistical Characterization , 2022 .