Evaluation of a new six degrees of freedom couch for radiation therapy.

PURPOSE The aim of this work is to evaluate the geometric accuracy of a prerelease version of a new six degrees of freedom (6DoF) couch. Additionally, a quality assurance method for 6DoF couches is proposed. METHODS The main principle of the performance tests was to request a known shift for the 6DoF couch and to compare this requested shift with the actually applied shift by independently measuring the applied shift using different methods (graph paper, laser, inclinometer, and imaging system). The performance of each of the six axes was tested separately as well as in combination with the other axes. Functional cases as well as realistic clinical cases were analyzed. The tests were performed without a couch load and with a couch load of up to 200 kg and shifts in the range between -4 and +4 cm for the translational axes and between -3° and +3° for the rotational axes were applied. The quality assurance method of the new 6DoF couch was performed using a simple cube phantom and the imaging system. RESULTS The deviations (mean ± one standard deviation) accumulated over all performance tests between the requested shifts and the measurements of the applied shifts were -0.01 ± 0.02, 0.01 ± 0.02, and 0.01 ± 0.02 cm for the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical axes, respectively. The corresponding values for the three rotational axes couch rotation, pitch, and roll were 0.03° ± 0.06°, -0.04° ± 0.12°, and -0.01° ± 0.08°, respectively. There was no difference found between the tests with and without a couch load of up to 200 kg. CONCLUSIONS The new 6DoF couch is able to apply requested shifts with high accuracy. It has the potential to be used for treatment techniques with the highest demands in patient setup accuracy such as those needed in stereotactic treatments. Shifts can be applied efficiently and automatically. Daily quality assurance of the 6DoF couch can be performed in an easy and efficient way. Long-term stability has to be evaluated in further tests.

[1]  David D. Smith,et al.  Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  D. Verellen,et al.  Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Precision of Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) in Six Degrees of Freedom and Limitations in Clinical Practice , 2007, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[5]  Riccardo Calandrino,et al.  Simultaneous tumour dose escalation and liver sparing in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for liver tumours due to CTV-to-PTV margin reduction. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Use of the BrainLAB ExacTrac X-Ray 6D system in image-guided radiotherapy. , 2008, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Examining margin reduction and its impact on dose distribution for prostate cancer patients undergoing daily cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  R. Warnick,et al.  Evaluation of image-guided positioning for frameless intracranial radiosurgery. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Martin G Sanda,et al.  Reduction in patient-reported acute morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with 81-Gy Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using reduced planning target volume margins and electromagnetic tracking: assessing the impact of margin reduction study. , 2010, Urology.

[10]  T Mizowaki,et al.  The geometric accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6D robotic couch system , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  S. Nill,et al.  IGRT versus non-IGRT for postoperative head-and-neck IMRT patients: dosimetric consequences arising from a PTV margin reduction , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[12]  Max Dahele,et al.  An analysis of patient positioning during stereotactic lung radiotherapy performed without rigid external immobilization. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Cai Grau,et al.  Residual rotational set-up errors after daily cone-beam CT image guided radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Thierry Gevaert,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a robotic 6-degree of freedom treatment couch for frameless radiosurgery. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Lijun Ma,et al.  Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizing cone-beam CT image-guidance with a robotic couch: intrafraction motion analysis accounting for all six degrees of freedom. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Song Gao,et al.  SU‐C‐213CD‐04: Evaluation of IsoCal Imaging Isocenter Calibration System for Varian OBI Machines , 2012 .

[17]  Michael K Fix,et al.  Assessment of patient setup errors in IGRT in combination with a six degrees of freedom couch. , 2014, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.