Making Inferences about Missing Information: The Effects of Existing Information

This article is concerned with the process by which inferences about missing information are formed. We propose that consumers use within-attribute (other-brand) processing first and, if that information is diagnostic, infer the value of the missing information with little consideration of additional information. If the within-attribute processing does not prove diagnostic, consumers then move to within-alternative (same-brand) processing. In two experiments, we find that high variation in other-brand information results in a statistically significant discount to the inferred value even with no variation in same-brand information, whereas the reverse is not true. This is supportive of an inference-formation process in which other-brand information is considered first. Further, we find that, if there is low variation in other-brand information, time and effort are reduced, attention to the attribute with the missing information is proportionately increased, and there is a shift away from alternative-based processing. These results, encompassing both traditional process measures and inference-based measures, support the process model that we advance.

[1]  J. Bettman,et al.  Multiattribute Measurement Models and Multiattribute Attitude Theory: A Test of Construct Validity , 1975 .

[2]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Adding versus averaging models revisited: A test of a path-analytic integration model. , 1981 .

[3]  John W. Payne,et al.  The Impact of accuracy and effort feedback and goals on adaptive decision behavior , 1990 .

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[5]  James Shanteau,et al.  Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information , 1976 .

[6]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[7]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Inference Effects without Inference Making? Effects of Missing Information on Discounting and Use of Presented Information , 1991 .

[8]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[9]  John W. Payne,et al.  Monitoring Information Processing and Decisions: The Mouselab System , 1989 .

[10]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[11]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations , 1982 .

[12]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations , 1988 .

[13]  G. T. Ford,et al.  Inferential Beliefs in Consumer Evaluations: An Assessment of Alternative Processing Strategies , 1987 .

[14]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[15]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  More than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Missing Information on Purchase Evaluations , 1985 .

[16]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Joel E. Urbany.  An Experimental Examination of the Economics of Information , 1986 .

[18]  I P Levin,et al.  Information integration in price-quality tradeoffs: The effect of missing information , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Sarah Fisher Gardial,et al.  In Search of the Elusive Consumer Inference , 1990 .

[20]  James Jaccard,et al.  The effects of incomplete information on the formation of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives. , 1988 .

[21]  Nancy H. Leonard,et al.  Inferences About Missing Attributes: Contingencies Affecting the Use of Alternative Information Sources , 1990 .

[22]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Evaluation of Partially Described Multiattribute Options , 1978 .