Reproducibility of fMRI: Effect of the Use of Contextual Information

We studied the effect of use of contextual information on the reproducibility of the results in analysis of fMRI data. We used data from a repeated simple motor fMRI experiment. In the first approach, statistical parametric maps were computed from a spatially unsmoothed data and thresholded using a Bonferroni corrected threshold. In the second approach, the maps were computed from a spatially unsmoothed data but were segmented into nonactive and active regions using a spatial contextual clustering method. In the third approach, the statistical parametric maps were computed from spatially smoothed data and thresholded, using, optionally, a spatial extent threshold. The variation in the classification was largest in the Bonferroni thresholded statistical parametric maps. There were no significant differences in variation between statistical parametric maps generated with all the other methods. In addition to reproducibility, the detection rates of weak simulated activations in the presence of measured scanner and physiological noise were investigated. Contextual clustering method was the most sensitive method, while the least sensitive method was the Bonferroni corrected thresholding. Using simulated data, we demonstrated that the contextual clustering method preserves the shapes of activation regions better than the method using spatial smoothing of the data.

[1]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Cortical surface statistical parametric mapping , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Xavier Descombes,et al.  fMRI Signal Restoration Using a Spatio-Temporal Markov Random Field Preserving Transitions , 1998, NeuroImage.

[4]  J C Gore,et al.  Functional brain imaging at 1.5 T using conventional gradient echo MR imaging techniques. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Searching scale space for activation in PET images , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Joseph A. Wolkan,et al.  Introduction to probability and statistics , 1994 .

[7]  M. Lowe,et al.  Spatially filtering functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  C. Genovese,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging I: Statistical methodology , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D C Noll,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging II: Application to motor and cognitive activation studies , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  John C. Gore,et al.  ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Susan Milton,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences , 1990 .

[12]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A critique of the use of the Kolmogorov‐Smirnov (KS) statistic for the analysis of BOLD fMRI data , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Ari Visa,et al.  Statistical Segmentation of fMRI Activations Using Contextual Clustering , 1999, MICCAI.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[17]  D. Y. von Cramon,et al.  Comparison of Filtering Methods for fMRI Datasets , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[21]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Analysis of individual brain activation maps using hierarchical description and multiscale detection , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Reproducibility of fMRI Results across Four Institutions Using a Spatial Working Memory Task , 1998, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Duyn,et al.  Investigation of Low Frequency Drift in fMRI Signal , 1999, NeuroImage.

[24]  W. J. DeCoursey,et al.  Introduction: Probability and Statistics , 2003 .