Badminton players show a lower coactivation and higher beta band intermuscular interactions of ankle antagonist muscles during isokinetic exercise

Previous studies have suggested that skilled athletes may show a specific muscle activation pattern with a lower antagonist coactivation level. Based on the point, we hypothesize that the coupling of antagonistic muscles may be different between badminton players and non-skilled individuals during exercises. The current work was designed to verify the hypothesis. Ten male college students and eight male badminton players performed three maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVC) and a set of three maximal concentric ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexions at an angular velocity of 30°, 60°, 120°, and 180°/s. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles during the test. Normalized average EMG amplitude and phase synchronization index (PSI) between surface EMG of TA and LG were calculated. Antagonist muscle coactivation was significantly lower (from 22.1% ± 9.4 and 10.7% ± 3.7 at 30°/s to 22.4% ± 9.7 and 10.6% ± 2.5 at 180°/s for non-players and badminton players group, respectively), and PSI in beta frequency band was significantly higher (from 0.42 ± 0.06 and 0.47 ± 0.15 at 30°/s to 0.35 ± 0.12 and 0.49 ± 0.14 at 180°/s) in the badminton player group compared with the non-player group during isokinetic ankle dorsiflexion contraction. No significant difference was found in antagonist muscle coactivation and PSI between two group subjects during ankle plantar flexion. The decrease of antagonist coactivation may indicate an optimal motor control style to increase the contraction efficiency, while the increase coupling of antagonistic muscles may help to ensure joint stability to compensate for the decrease of antagonist coactivation. Graphical abstract Significant difference of observed indexes between non-players and badminton players. Significant difference of observed indexes between non-players and badminton players.

[1]  T. Kuiken,et al.  A simulation study to examine the use of cross-correlation as an estimate of surface EMG cross talk. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  M. Burtscher,et al.  Leg Dominance Is a Risk Factor for Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Recreational Skiers , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Carlo J De Luca,et al.  Inter-electrode spacing of surface EMG sensors: reduction of crosstalk contamination during voluntary contractions. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Abián-Vicén,et al.  Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London , 2014 .

[5]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Carlo J De Luca,et al.  Common drive in motor units of a synergistic muscle pair. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Co-contraction activity of ankle muscles during walking: A gender comparison , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[8]  Francesco Felici,et al.  Tennis players show a lower coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles during isokinetic exercises. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  Hsiao-Lung Chan,et al.  Increases of Quadriceps Inter-Muscular Cross-Correlation and Coherence during Exhausting Stepping Exercise , 2012, Sensors.

[10]  A. E. Schulman,et al.  Electroencephalographic measurement of motor cortex control of muscle activity in humans , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Anna Jaskólska,et al.  EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  T. G. Balshaw,et al.  Do changes in neuromuscular activation contribute to the knee extensor angle–torque relationship? , 2017, Experimental physiology.

[13]  E Cafarelli,et al.  Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  F. Bojsen-Møller,et al.  Antagonist muscle coactivation during isokinetic knee extension , 2000, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[15]  P. Aagaard,et al.  Torque–velocity characteristics and contractile rate of force development in elite badminton players , 2007 .

[16]  Dick F. Stegeman,et al.  Reliability and Agreement of Intramuscular Coherence in Tibialis Anterior Muscle , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  F. Felici,et al.  Coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles is not affected by the speed of movement in isokinetic exercise , 2006, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  E. Olivier,et al.  Coherent oscillations in monkey motor cortex and hand muscle EMG show task‐dependent modulation , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R. Neptune,et al.  The effect of pedaling rate on coordination in cycling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Duchateau,et al.  The neural control of coactivation during fatiguing contractions revisited. , 2014, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[23]  Madeleine M. Lowery,et al.  Fatigue related changes in electromyographic coherence between synergistic hand muscles , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Dario Farina,et al.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. , 2014, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  Lejun Wang,et al.  Fatigue-related electromyographic coherence and phase synchronization analysis between antagonistic elbow muscles , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  J. Abián-Vicén,et al.  Muscle damage produced during a simulated badminton match in competitive male players , 2016, Research in sports medicine.

[27]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Kazuo Kiguchi,et al.  A Study on Lower-Limb Muscle Activities during Daily Lower-Limb Motions , 2007 .

[29]  Eberhard E. Fetz,et al.  Effects of Input Synchrony on the Firing Rate of a Three-Conductance Cortical Neuron Model , 1994, Neural Computation.

[30]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Cortical and spinal modulation of antagonist coactivation during a submaximal fatiguing contraction in humans. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Lowery,et al.  Effect of Knee Joint Angle and Contraction Intensity on Hamstrings Coactivation , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  Usman Naeem,et al.  High-Frequency Intermuscular Coherence between Arm Muscles during Robot-Mediated Motor Adaptation , 2017, Frontiers in physiology.

[33]  D Farina,et al.  Surface EMG Crosstalk Evaluated from Experimental Recordings and Simulated Signals , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[34]  M. Stock,et al.  Sex comparisons of strength and coactivation following ten weeks of deadlift training. , 2014, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[35]  J. Ushiba,et al.  Muscle fatigue-induced enhancement of corticomuscular coherence following sustained submaximal isometric contraction of the tibialis anterior muscle. , 2011, Journal of applied physiology.

[36]  Mikhail Kuznetsov,et al.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Neural mechanisms of intermuscular coherence: implications for the rectification of surface electromyography. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Fabien Dal Maso,et al.  Training-related decrease in antagonist muscles activation is associated with increased motor cortex activation: evidence of central mechanisms for control of antagonist muscles , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  J. Avela,et al.  Aging and Strength Training Influence Knee Extensor Intermuscular Coherence During Low- and High-Force Isometric Contractions , 2019, Front. Physiol..