Rising incidence of heart failure demands action

518 www.thelancet.com Vol 391 February 10, 2018 Heart failure is a life-threatening syndrome with substantial morbidity and mortality and is a burden to patients, their carers, and health systems. Estimates of heart failure incidence and prevalence are difficult to generate. Accurate epidemiological estimates of heart failure, however, are crucial to ensure resources are appropriately and adequately allocated to treat patients with existing disease, and to inform prevention methods among those at risk. The population-based study of 4 million individuals by Nathalie Conrad and colleagues in The Lancet is a valuable contribution to the literature on heart failure epidemiology. At first glance, the standardised incidence reported in this study, which uses data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), could be encouraging: a reduction of 7% was noted between 2002 and 2014 (from 358 to 332 per 100 000 person-years; adjusted incidence rate ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·91–0·94), primarily driven by a decrease in those aged 60–84 years of age. However, on further inspection, the data are cause for concern. First, the incidence has increased in people older than 85 years. This group of patients has been excluded from most randomised controlled trials that form the evidence base for treating heart failure. Although data from randomised controlled trials are routinely extrapolated to these patients, the balance of benefits and risks for standard therapies could differ in the very elderly (>85 years). It is problematic that the benefits and risks of treatment are uncertain for an already large and growing number of patients. Traditional prospective randomised trials to test standard therapies in the very elderly might be challenging, but randomised registry trials using electronic health records (as has been previously done with the CPRD) could be suitable alternatives for evidence generation in this group of patients. Second, the increases in the estimated absolute number of individuals with newly diagnosed heart failure (from 170 727 in 2002 to 190 798 in 2014 [12%]) and the number of prevalent heart failure cases in the UK (from 750 127 to 920 616 [23%]) are concerning. The authors postulate that these increases are partly attributable to better survival after myocardial infarction. Although new heart failure cases can be viewed as an ironic success if they arise from more patients surviving myocardial infarction because of advances in acute coronary syndrome management, these cases should be viewed as failures when they originate from poor adherence to heart failure prevention strategies—for example, inadequate hypertension control. In this analysis, socioeconomic deprivation was associated with a higher incidence of heart failure at a younger age and more comorbidities. It is concerning that from 2002 to 2014, the socioeconomic gradient in age at first presentation with heart failure widened. By contrast with the heart failure trends reported by Conrad and colleagues, the incidence of myocardial infarction has declined by about 30%, suggesting that heart failure prevention strategies have been less successful than have strategies to prevent coronary artery disease. Many reports cite the widespread inadequacy with which blood pressure is controlled in clinical practice, whereas the greatest benefit of blood-pressure lowering is actually the prevention of heart failure. Heart failure can also now be prevented by use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes. Both hypertension and diabetes are also more common in lower socioeconomic groups. Prevention strategies targeting these specific comorbidities could have an impact on reversing the epidemiological trends reported in this analysis. Finally, the increasing prevalence of heart failure might also be attributed to implementation of effective evidence-based therapies that prolong survival in patients with the disorder with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Fewer patients with HFrEF are dying suddenly than before, leading to more patients living longer with chronic heart failure, progressing to advanced stages of the disease, becoming candidates for advanced therapies for heart failure (eg, mechanical circulatory support devices, heart transplantation), and having more frequent and costly hospital admissions. Considering the large and growing number of patients that will progress to advanced heart failure, and the costs of these advanced interventions, provision of these treatment options is probably not sustainable for most health systems. The potential for advanced heart failure therapies to divert limited resources away from Rising incidence of heart failure demands action

[1]  D. DeMets,et al.  Cardiovascular drug development: is it dead or just hibernating? , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Heymans,et al.  Rationale of the FIBROTARGETS study designed to identify novel biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis , 2017, ESC heart failure.

[3]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Determinants of the decline in mortality from acute myocardial infarction in England between 2002 and 2010: linked national database study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Nikolaos Maniadakis,et al.  The medical and socioeconomic burden of heart failure: A comparative delineation with cancer. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  M. Packer Who Should Deliver Medical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Heart Failure? An Immediate Call for Action to Implement a Community-Based Collaborative Solution. , 2017, Circulation. Heart failure.

[6]  Martin McKee,et al.  Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. , 2013, JAMA.

[7]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Streamlining cardiovascular clinical trials to improve efficiency and generalisability , 2017, Heart.

[8]  Harry Hemingway,et al.  Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals , 2017, The Lancet.

[9]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Reducing the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease, Part 2: Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease , 2017, Circulation research.

[10]  S. Anderson,et al.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, The Lancet.

[11]  B. Zinman,et al.  Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial , 2016, European heart journal.

[12]  K. Bhaskaran,et al.  Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.