Discrimination of Visual Categories Based on Behavioral Relevance in Widespread Regions of Frontoparietal Cortex

Allocating attentional resources to currently relevant information in a dynamically changing environment is critical to goal-directed behavior. Previous studies in nonhuman primates (NHPs) have demonstrated modulation of neural representations of stimuli, in particular visual categorizations, by behavioral significance in the lateral prefrontal cortex. In the human brain, a network of frontal and parietal regions, the “multiple demand” (MD) system, is involved in cognitive and attentional control. To test for the effect of behavioral significance on categorical discrimination in the MD system in humans, we adapted a previously used task in the NHP and used multivoxel pattern analysis for fMRI data. In a cued-detection categorization task, participants detected whether an image from one of two target visual categories was present in a display. Our results revealed that categorical discrimination is modulated by behavioral relevance, as measured by the distributed pattern of response across the MD network. Distinctions between categories with different behavioral status (e.g., a target and a nontarget) were significantly discriminated. Category distinctions that were not behaviorally relevant (e.g., between two targets) were not discriminated. Other aspects of the task that were orthogonal to the behavioral decision did not modulate categorical discrimination. In a high visual region, the lateral occipital complex, modulation by behavioral relevance was evident in its posterior subregion but not in the anterior subregion. The results are consistent with the view of the MD system as involved in top-down attentional and cognitive control by selective coding of task-relevant discriminations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Control of cognitive demands fundamentally involves flexible allocation of attentional resources depending on a current behavioral context. Essential to such a mechanism is the ability to select currently relevant information and at the same time filter out information that is irrelevant. In an fMRI study, we measured distributed patterns of activity for objects from different visual categories while manipulating the behavioral relevance of the categorical distinctions. In a network of frontal and parietal cortical regions, the multiple-demand (MD) network, patterns reflected category distinctions that were relevant to behavior. Patterns could not be used to make task-irrelevant category distinctions. These findings demonstrate the ability of the MD network to implement complex goal-directed behavior by focused attention.

[1]  B. Milner Effects of Different Brain Lesions on Card Sorting: The Role of the Frontal Lobes , 1963 .

[2]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[3]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[4]  A. Luria Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[5]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Prefrontal unit activity during delayed conditional Go/No-go discrimination in the monkey. II. Relation to Go and No-go responses , 1986, Brain Research.

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  E. Miller,et al.  Task-specific neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 2001, Science.

[14]  J. Duncan,et al.  Filtering of neural signals by focused attention in the monkey prefrontal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  H. Niki,et al.  Encoding of behavioral significance of visual stimuli by primate prefrontal neurons: relation to relevant task conditions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Chris J. Tinsley,et al.  Selective representation of task‐relevant objects and locations in the monkey prefrontal cortex , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  M. Giese,et al.  Flexible Coding for Categorical Decisions in the Human Brain , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Categorization Training Results in Shape- and Category-Selective Human Neural Plasticity , 2007, Neuron.

[22]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[25]  J. Duncan,et al.  Top-Down Activation of Shape-Specific Population Codes in Visual Cortex during Mental Imagery , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Attention and biased competition in multi-voxel object representations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Miranda Scolari,et al.  Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  John Duncan,et al.  Executive function and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  John Duncan,et al.  Fluid intelligence loss linked to restricted regions of damage within frontal and parietal cortex , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Jefferson E. Roy,et al.  Representation of Multiple, Independent Categories in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[32]  John Duncan,et al.  Target Detection by Opponent Coding in Monkey Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Three dimensional echo-planar imaging at 7 Tesla , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  John Duncan,et al.  Multi-voxel coding of stimuli, rules, and responses in human frontoparietal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[35]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Attention Improves Encoding of Task-Relevant Features in the Human Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Differential coupling of visual cortex with default network or frontal-parietal network based on goals , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Constructing scenes from objects in human occipitotemporal cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Duncan,et al.  Adaptive Coding of Task-Relevant Information in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Feature-Specific Attentional Priority Signals in Human Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Rodrigo F. Salazar,et al.  Content-Specific Fronto-Parietal Synchronization During Visual Working Memory , 2012, Science.

[41]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Visual categorization and the parietal cortex , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[42]  Daniel J Mitchell,et al.  Seeing different objects in different ways: Measuring ventral visual tuning to sensory and semantic features with dynamically adaptive imaging , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[43]  W. Singer,et al.  Auditory motion direction encoding in auditory cortex and high‐level visual cortex , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Goal-directed attention alters the tuning of object-based representations in extrastriate cortex , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Preferential Encoding of Visual Categories in Parietal Cortex Compared to Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[47]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  N. Sigala,et al.  Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[49]  John Duncan,et al.  Dynamic Construction of a Coherent Attentional State in a Prefrontal Cell Population , 2013, Neuron.

[50]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[51]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Polina Golland,et al.  Coping with confounds in multivoxel pattern analysis: What should we do about reaction time differences? A comment on Todd, Nystrom & Cohen 2013 , 2014, NeuroImage.

[53]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Clutter Modulates the Representation of Target Objects in the Human Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Single-Unit Recordings in the Macaque Face Patch System Reveal Limitations of fMRI MVPA , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional Characterization of the Cingulo-Opercular Network in the Maintenance of Tonic Alertness. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Attention enhances multi-voxel representation of novel objects in frontal, parietal and visual cortices , 2015, NeuroImage.