Acute effects of 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on human visual task and cardiovascular performance.

One hundred subjects, males and females with ages ranging between 18 and 48 years, were studied under both field-exposed and sham-exposed conditions. A 50 Hz, 100 mu T magnetic field (MF) was used. To examine the effect of field exposure on performance, a two-alternative, forced-choice, duration-discrimination task with three levels of difficulty was used. The subject's task was to decide which of two sequentially presented light flashes had the longer duration. The standard duration was 50 ms, and the alternative durations were 65, 100, or 125 ms. Both reaction time and percentage of correct responses were recorded for each subject. MF and sham exposure were for 9 min each. Blood pressure and heart rate were also measured before and following MF exposure and sham-exposure trials. The study was performed double blind, with the exposure order counterbalanced. Compared to sham exposure, MF exposure significantly decreased reaction time on the hardest level of the performance task. MF exposure did not reliably affect percentage correct or cardiovascular performance. It was demonstrated that a relatively high level of statistical power was the basis for the observed MF effect, and the need to pay closer attention to power levels in future research is discussed.

[1]  F. Gamberale Physiological and psychological effects of exposure to extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields on humans. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[2]  S. Wise,et al.  Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs , 1986 .

[3]  J. Podd,et al.  Do ELF magnetic fields affect human reaction time? , 1995, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  H D Cohen,et al.  A replication study of human exposure to 60-Hz fields: effects on neurobehavioral measures. , 1992, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  C J Whittington,et al.  Human performance and physiology: a statistical power analysis of ELF electromagnetic field research. , 1996, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[7]  W S Gunn,et al.  Exercise testing in the evaluation of human responses to powerline frequency fields. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  W. Hager,et al.  Tables and Procedures for the Determination of Power and Sample Sizes in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Variance and Regression , 1986 .

[9]  H D Cohen,et al.  Dose response study of human exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields. , 1994, Bioelectromagnetics.

[10]  D. P. Cumes-Rayner,et al.  Blood pressure reactivity: pitfalls in methodology. , 1988, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[11]  L Korpinen,et al.  Influence of 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields on the human heart. , 1993, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  C. Blackman,et al.  Clarification and application of an ion parametric resonance model for magnetic field interactions with biological systems. , 1994, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Effects of 45-Hz magnetic fields on the functional state of the human brain. , 1993, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[15]  L Korpinen,et al.  Influence of 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields on the pulse rate of human heart. , 1994, Bioelectromagnetics.

[16]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  OPEN A NEW WINDOW IN RATIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING: ADJUST ALPHA TO MAXIMIZE STATISTICAL POWER , 1983 .