A simple method for visualizing the differences between related receptor sites.

Pastor and Cruciani [J. Med. Chem. 38 (1995) 4637] and Kastenholz et al. [J. Med. Chem. 43 (2000) 3033] pioneered methods for comparing related receptors, with the ultimate goal of designing selective ligands. Such methods start with a reasonable superposition of high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) structures of the receptors. Next, molecular field maps are calculated for each receptor. Then the maps are analyzed to determine which map features are correlated with a particular subset of receptors. We present a method FLOGTV, based on the trend vector paradigm [J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25 (1985) 64] to perform the analysis. This is mathematically simpler than the GRID/CPCA method of Kastenholz et al. and allows for the simultaneous comparison of many receptor structures. Also, the trend vector paradigm provides a method of selecting isopotential contours that are well above "noise". We demonstrate the method on four examples: HIV proteases versus two-domain acid proteases, thrombin versus trypsin and factor Xa, bacterial dihydrofolate reductases (DHFRs) versus vertebrate DHFRs, and P38 versus ERK protein kinases.

[1]  R. Venkataraghavan,et al.  Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications , 1985, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Mika A. Kastenholz,et al.  GRID/CPCA: a new computational tool to design selective ligands. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Yvonne C. Martin,et al.  3D QSAR: current state, scope, and limitations , 1998 .

[4]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  FLOG: A system to select ‘quasi-flexible’ ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[5]  E. A. O'neill,et al.  Design and synthesis of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable tetrasubstituted imidazole inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. , 1999, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[6]  R S Bohacek,et al.  Definition and display of steric, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bonding properties of ligand binding sites in proteins using Lee and Richards accessible surface: validation of a high-resolution graphical tool for drug design. , 1992, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  M Pastor,et al.  A novel strategy for improving ligand selectivity in receptor-based drug design. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Bruce L. Bush,et al.  Extending the trend vector: The trend matrix and sample-based partial least squares , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[9]  P. Goodford.  A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  W. Richards,et al.  Self-organizing molecular field analysis: a tool for structure-activity studies. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  R. Sheridan,et al.  SQ: a program for rapidly producing pharmacophorically relevent molecular superpositions. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  G. Maggiora,et al.  Comparing protein structures: a Gaussian-based approach to the three-dimensional structural similarity of proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[13]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..