The Process is the Reality: Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Participatory Democracy

To (re)connect and (re-)engage citizens with their governing institutions, many advanced industrial democracies have adopted innovative reforms designed to ‘transform’ the way citizens interact with public institutions. This article assesses the extent to which the Scottish Parliament's petitioning system, a reform designed to connect the Scottish public with its parliament, influences broader trust in the political system. Using structural equations to model data from a survey of Scottish Parliament petitioners, the article finds that process evaluations far exceed outcome evaluations in influencing petitioner trust in political institutions. Hence simply adopting reforms that allow for ‘civic engagement’ is not enough to improve public support for the political system. Great care must be taken in adopting transformative reforms to ensure that those members of the public who do choose to ‘engage’ with political institutions see procedures as fair and politically neutral.

[1]  Patrick Seyd,et al.  High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain , 2002 .

[2]  Marcia Grimes Organizing consent: The role of procedural fairness in political trust and compliance , 2006 .

[3]  L. Leduc The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective , 2003 .

[4]  R. Dalton Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices , 2004 .

[5]  P. Norris Institutional Explanations for Political Support , 1999 .

[6]  R. Dalton,et al.  Public Opinion and Direct Democracy , 2001 .

[7]  R. Dalton Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 2008 .

[8]  P. Norris Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens? , 1999 .

[9]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[10]  Kenneth Newton,et al.  Political Support: Social Capital, Civil Society and Political and Economic Performance , 2006 .

[11]  T. Tyler The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure , 2000 .

[13]  Charles D. Elder,et al.  Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building , 1975 .

[14]  R. Ormston SCOTTISH SOCIAL ATTITUDES SURVEY 2007 CORE MODULE REPORT 1: ATTITUDES TO GOVERNMENT IN SCOTLAND , 2008 .

[15]  N. Mcgarvey,et al.  Scottish Politics: An Introduction , 2008 .

[16]  Todd Donovan,et al.  Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies , 2007 .

[17]  D. Arter The Scottish Parliament: A Scandinavian-Style Assembly? , 2004 .

[18]  Bruce E. Cain,et al.  Democracy Transformed?: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 2003 .

[19]  R. Dalton Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracie , 1998 .

[20]  Keith Faulks :Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy , 2006 .

[21]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Governing Amid Diversity , 2020 .

[22]  June Andrews,et al.  The Scottish Parliament. , 2004, Journal of nursing management.

[23]  B. Benjamin Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance , 2007 .

[24]  John D. Robertson Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[25]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[26]  Elizabeth Theiss-Morse,et al.  Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Charles Pattie,et al.  Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain , 2003 .

[28]  R. Inglehart Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[29]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  CITIZENS AS LEGISLATORS: DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[30]  Thomas W. Mangione,et al.  Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality , 1995 .

[31]  Daniel A. Smith For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[32]  Fairness, Equality, and Democracy: Three Big Words , 2006, Social Research: An International Quarterly.

[33]  A. Lupia,et al.  DIRECT DEMOCRACY: New Approaches to Old Questions , 2004 .

[34]  Charles Pattie,et al.  Civic Attitudes and Engagement in Modern Britain , 2003 .