Analysis of gene expression in two human‐derived cell lines exposed in vitro to a 1.9 GHz pulse‐modulated radiofrequency field

There is considerable controversy surrounding the biological effects of radiofrequency (RF) fields, as emitted by mobile phones. Previous work from our laboratory has shown no effect related to the exposure of 1.9 GHz pulse‐modulated RF fields on the expression of 22 000 genes in a human glioblastoma‐derived cell‐line (U87MG) at 6 h following a 4 h RF field exposure period. As a follow‐up to this study, we have now examined the effect of RF field exposure on the possible expression of late onset genes in U87MG cells after a 24 h RF exposure period. In addition, a human monocyte‐derived cell‐line (Mono‐Mac‐6, MM6) was exposed to intermittent (5 min ON, 10 min OFF) RF fields for 6 h and then gene expression was assessed immediately after exposure and at 18 h postexposure. Both cell lines were exposed to 1.9 GHz pulse‐modulated RF fields for 6 or 24 h at specific absorption rates (SARs) of 0.1–10.0 W/kg. In support of our previous results, we found no evidence that nonthermal RF field exposure could alter gene expression in either cultured U87MG or MM6 cells, relative to nonirradiated control groups. However, exposure of both cell‐lines to heat‐shock conditions (43°C for 1 h) caused an alteration in the expression of a number of well‐characterized heat‐shock proteins.

[1]  L. Verschaeve,et al.  Genetic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of radiofrequency fields. , 1998, Mutation research.

[2]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Gene expression changes in human cells after exposure to mobile phone microwaves , 2006, Proteomics.

[3]  J. Mcnamee,et al.  Cylindrical waveguide applicator for in vitro exposure of cell culture samples to 1.9‐GHz radiofrequency fields , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[5]  M Simkó,et al.  Hsp70 expression and free radical release after exposure to non-thermal radio-frequency electromagnetic fields and ultrafine particles in human Mono Mac 6 cells. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[6]  J E Moulder,et al.  Mobile phones, mobile phone base stations and cancer: a review , 2005, International journal of radiation biology.

[7]  G H Strauss,et al.  Non-random cell killing in cryopreservation: implications for performance of the battery of leukocyte tests (BLT), I. Toxic and immunotoxic effects. , 1991, Mutation research.

[8]  J. Mcnamee,et al.  Analysis of proto-oncogene and heat-shock protein gene expression in human derived cell-lines exposed in vitro to an intermittent 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency field , 2006, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  J P McNamee,et al.  Microarray Gene Expression Profiling of a Human Glioblastoma Cell Line Exposed In Vitro to a 1.9 GHz Pulse-Modulated Radiofrequency Field , 2006, Radiation research.

[10]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Population Marginal Means in the Linear Model: An Alternative to Least Squares Means , 1980 .

[11]  Hao Wu,et al.  MAANOVA: A Software Package for the Analysis of Spotted cDNA Microarray Experiments , 2003 .

[12]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[13]  J. Goodnight,et al.  Least squares means in the fixed effects general model , 1978 .

[14]  Anthony T Barker,et al.  Effect of 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields on Nonthermal Induction of Heat-Shock Proteins in Human Leukocytes , 2005, Radiation research.

[15]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[16]  S. Velizarov,et al.  CHANGES IN CELLULAR PROTEINS DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL NON-IONIZING RADIATION. I. HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS , 2001 .

[17]  R. Carroll.  Variances Are Not Always Nuisance Parameters , 2003 .

[18]  M Kathleen Kerr,et al.  Design considerations for efficient and effective microarray studies. , 2003, Biometrics.

[19]  E. Moros,et al.  The Heat-Shock Factor is not Activated in Mammalian Cells Exposed to Cellular Phone Frequency Microwaves , 2005, Radiation research.

[20]  R. Carroll.  Fisher Lecture: the 2002 R. A. Fisher lecture: dedicated to the memory of Shanti S. Gupta. Variances are not always nuisance parameters. , 2003, Biometrics.

[21]  Chenn Q. Zhou,et al.  2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells , 2005, FEBS letters.

[22]  W. R. Adey,et al.  Exposure of nerve growth factor-treated PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells to a modulated radiofrequency field at 836.55 MHz: effects on c-jun and c-fos expression. , 1997, Bioelectromagnetics.

[23]  Daniel J. Park,et al.  A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridization-based technologies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  M. Simkó,et al.  Free Radical Release and HSP70 Expression in Two Human Immune-Relevant Cell Lines after Exposure to 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation , 2006, Radiation research.

[25]  X. Cui,et al.  Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[26]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  J P McNamee,et al.  Gene Expression Analysis of a Human Lymphoblastoma Cell Line Exposed In Vitro to an Intermittent 1.9 GHz Pulse-Modulated Radiofrequency Field , 2006, Radiation research.

[28]  D. Allison,et al.  Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  Dariusz Leszczynski,et al.  Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. , 2002, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[30]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms , 2005, Nature Methods.

[31]  P. French,et al.  EFFECTS ON PROTEIN KINASE C AND GENE EXPRESSION IN A HUMAN MAST CELL LINE, HMC‐1, FOLLOWING MICROWAVE EXPOSURE , 1999, Cell biology international.

[32]  W F Pickard,et al.  Proto-oncogene mRNA levels and activities of multiple transcription factors in C3H 10T 1/2 murine embryonic fibroblasts exposed to 835.62 and 847.74 MHz cellular phone communication frequency radiation. , 1999, Radiation research.

[33]  A. Poustka,et al.  Parameter estimation for the calibration and variance stabilization of microarray data , 2003, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[34]  Lingli Wang,et al.  Effects of Global System for Mobile Communications 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on gene and protein expression in MCF‐7 cells , 2006, Proteomics.

[35]  T Suhara,et al.  Phosphorylation and gene expression of p53 are not affected in human cells exposed to 2.1425 GHz band CW or W‐CDMA modulated radiation allocated to mobile radio base stations , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[36]  Guenter Obe,et al.  Controversial Cytogenetic Observations in Mammalian Somatic Cells Exposed to Radiofrequency Radiation , 2004, Radiation research.

[37]  Y. Takashima,et al.  Effects of exposure to a 1950 MHz radio frequency field on expression of Hsp70 and Hsp27 in human glioma cells , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[38]  Members of the Complex Trait Consortium,et al.  Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms , 2005 .

[39]  N. Kuster,et al.  High frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM signals) affect gene expression levels in tumor suppressor p53‐deficient embryonic stem cells , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[40]  E. Moros,et al.  Gene Expression does not Change Significantly in C3H 10T½ Cells after Exposure to 847.74 CDMA or 835.62 FDMA Radiofrequency Radiation , 2006, Radiation research.