Epigenetic control of embryonic stem cell fate

Embryonic stem (ES) cells have the ability to self-renew, producing daughter cells with equivalent developmental potential, or to differentiate into more specialized cells. ES cells are derived from the inner cell mass of the preimplantation embryo and are pluripotent, as they are able to differentiate into cells of the three germ layers, both in vitro and in vivo (Evans and Kaufman, 1981; Thomson et al., 1998). Three transcription factors, OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG, cooperate to ensure the self-renewal and pluripotency of ES cells (Boyer et al., 2005; Loh et al., 2006). These factors are highly expressed in undifferentiated ES cells and physically interact with each other in large protein complexes (Wang et al., 2006; van den Berg et al., 2010). OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG are transcriptionally interconnected and co-occupy promoters of actively transcribed genes that promote ES cell self-renewal such as KLF4 (Boyer et al., 2005; Loh et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2008). They also occupy genes encoding a large set of developmental regulators that are silent in ES cells, but whose expression is associated with lineage commitment and cellular differentiation (Fig. 1; Boyer et al., 2005; Loh et al., 2006). The fact that the three key regulators can activate some genes and repress others is thought to be caused by the chromatin packaging in ES cells that are regulated by epigenetic factors. Epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression that are independent of nucleotide sequence. This is achieved by regulating gene activity through alterations of chromatin structure, such as posttranslational modifications of the histones and DNA methylation, which can be either permissive or restrictive for transcription. These changes are catalyzed by histone and DNA modification enzymes that work in coordination to coregulate the balance between pluripotency and lineagespecific differentiation. The question is how these multiple regulatory mechanisms are coordinated to control the transcriptional state of pluripotent versus developmental genes in ES cells and during in vitro differentiation of ES cells. In this Review, we describe recent advances in the understanding of the role of the repressive epigenetic marks deposited by Polycomb group (PcG) repressive complexes and DNA methyl transferases (DNMTs) on ES cell self-renewal and differentiation.

[1]  Victoria Lundblad,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Trends in Genetics.

[2]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Long Noncoding RNA as Modular Scaffold of Histone Modification Complexes , 2010, Science.

[3]  M. Surani,et al.  Genome-Wide Reprogramming in the Mouse Germ Line Entails the Base Excision Repair Pathway , 2010, Science.

[4]  K. Helin,et al.  Polycomb group protein-mediated repression of transcription. , 2010, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[5]  Richard A Young,et al.  Short RNAs are transcribed from repressed polycomb target genes and interact with polycomb repressive complex-2. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[6]  Luca Mazzarella,et al.  Jarid2 is a PRC2 component in embryonic stem cells required for multi-lineage differentiation and recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Polymerase II to developmental regulators , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Ring1B compacts chromatin structure and represses gene expression independent of histone ubiquitination. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[8]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[9]  Robert S. Illingworth,et al.  CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1 , 2010, Nature.

[10]  Debbie L C van den Berg,et al.  An Oct4-Centered Protein Interaction Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[11]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  JARID2 regulates binding of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 to target genes in ES cells , 2010, Nature.

[12]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Chromatin signature of embryonic pluripotency is established during genome activation , 2010, Nature.

[13]  M. Jaritz,et al.  Polycomb complexes act redundantly to repress genomic repeats and genes. , 2010, Genes & development.

[14]  Gang Li,et al.  Jarid2 and PRC2, partners in regulating gene expression. , 2010, Genes & development.

[15]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors , 2010, Nature.

[16]  P. Park,et al.  A Region of the Human HOXD Cluster that Confers Polycomb-Group Responsiveness , 2010, Cell.

[17]  S. Orkin,et al.  Jumonji Modulates Polycomb Activity and Self-Renewal versus Differentiation of Stem Cells , 2009, Cell.

[18]  Arend Sidow,et al.  Jarid2/Jumonji Coordinates Control of PRC2 Enzymatic Activity and Target Gene Occupancy in Pluripotent Cells , 2009, Cell.

[19]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks , 2009, Nature.

[20]  J. Rinn,et al.  Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  G. Hannon,et al.  Ezh2 Orchestrates Gene Expression for the Stepwise Differentiation of Tissue-Specific Stem Cells , 2009, Cell.

[22]  Michael F. Lin,et al.  Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals , 2009, Nature.

[23]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  Chromatin signatures in multipotent human hematopoietic stem cells indicate the fate of bivalent genes during differentiation. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[24]  Julien Gagneur,et al.  Dynamic regulation by polycomb group protein complexes controls pattern formation and the cell cycle in Drosophila. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[25]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Ezh1 and Ezh2 maintain repressive chromatin through different mechanisms. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[26]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Polycomb Proteins Targeted by a Short Repeat RNA to the Mouse X Chromosome , 2008, Science.

[27]  J. Komorowski,et al.  Kcnq1ot1 antisense noncoding RNA mediates lineage-specific transcriptional silencing through chromatin-level regulation. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[28]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells , 2008, Nature.

[30]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[31]  Terry Magnuson,et al.  Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Is Dispensable for Maintenance of Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency , 2008, Stem cells.

[32]  K. Helin,et al.  Erasing the methyl mark: histone demethylases at the center of cellular differentiation and disease. , 2008, Genes & development.

[33]  K. Helin,et al.  Coordinated regulation of transcriptional repression by the RBP2 H3K4 demethylase and Polycomb-Repressive Complex 2. , 2008, Genes & development.

[34]  S. Orkin,et al.  An Extended Transcriptional Network for Pluripotency of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[35]  M. Bollen,et al.  The transcriptional repressor NIPP1 is an essential player in EZH2-mediated gene silencing , 2008, Oncogene.

[36]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Ezh2 Requires PHF1 To Efficiently Catalyze H3 Lysine 27 Trimethylation In Vivo , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  Hengbin Wang,et al.  Role of hPHF1 in H3K27 Methylation and Hox Gene Silencing , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[38]  Haruhiko Koseki,et al.  Ring1-mediated ubiquitination of H2A restrains poised RNA polymerase II at bivalent genes in mouse ES cells , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[39]  Min Gyu Lee,et al.  Demethylation of H3K27 Regulates Polycomb Recruitment and H2A Ubiquitination , 2007, Science.

[40]  I. Issaeva,et al.  UTX and JMJD3 are histone H3K27 demethylases involved in HOX gene regulation and development , 2007, Nature.

[41]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  A histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase regulates animal posterior development , 2007, Nature.

[42]  Atif Shahab,et al.  Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[43]  G. Pan,et al.  Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[44]  H. Stunnenberg,et al.  Pcl-PRC2 is needed to generate high levels of H3-K27 trimethylation at Polycomb target genes , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[45]  C. Allis,et al.  DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA , 2007, Nature.

[46]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[47]  R. Young,et al.  A Chromatin Landmark and Transcription Initiation at Most Promoters in Human Cells , 2007, Cell.

[48]  G. Dressler,et al.  PTIP Associates with MLL3- and MLL4-containing Histone H3 Lysine 4 Methyltransferase Complex*♦ , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Functional Demarcation of Active and Silent Chromatin Domains in Human HOX Loci by Noncoding RNAs , 2007, Cell.

[50]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[51]  Kristian Helin,et al.  The Polycomb Group Protein Suz12 Is Required for Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[52]  C. Croce,et al.  Knockdown of ALR (MLL2) Reveals ALR Target Genes and Leads to Alterations in Cell Adhesion and Growth , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[53]  Stuart H. Orkin,et al.  A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature.

[54]  Suresh Cuddapah,et al.  The genomic landscape of histone modifications in human T cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[56]  Tomohiro Hayakawa,et al.  Maintenance of self‐renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b , 2006, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[57]  Henriette O'Geen,et al.  Suz12 binds to silenced regions of the genome in a cell-type-specific manner. , 2006, Genome research.

[58]  J. Zeitlinger,et al.  Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature.

[59]  Kristian Helin,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. , 2006, Genes & development.

[60]  James A. Cuff,et al.  A Bivalent Chromatin Structure Marks Key Developmental Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[61]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Control of Developmental Regulators by Polycomb in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[62]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[63]  M. Lagarkova,et al.  Diverse Epigenetic Profile of Novel Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines , 2006, Cell cycle.

[64]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[65]  R. Kingston,et al.  Chromatin Compaction by a Polycomb Group Protein Complex , 2004, Science.

[66]  Haruhiko Koseki,et al.  Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[67]  Kristian Helin,et al.  Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[68]  S. Simonsson,et al.  DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[69]  J. Min,et al.  Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. , 2003, Genes & development.

[70]  J. Voncken,et al.  Rnf2 (Ring1b) deficiency causes gastrulation arrest and cell cycle inhibition , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. , 2002, Genes & development.

[72]  Thomas A Milne,et al.  MLL targets SET domain methyltransferase activity to Hox gene promoters. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[73]  Brigitte Wild,et al.  Histone Methyltransferase Activity of a Drosophila Polycomb Group Repressor Complex , 2002, Cell.

[74]  V. Pirrotta,et al.  Drosophila Enhancer of Zeste/ESC Complexes Have a Histone H3 Methyltransferase Activity that Marks Chromosomal Polycomb Sites , 2002, Cell.

[75]  Hengbin Wang,et al.  Role of Histone H3 Lysine 27 Methylation in Polycomb-Group Silencing , 2002, Science.

[76]  T. Magnuson,et al.  The mouse PcG gene eed is required for Hox gene repression and extraembryonic development , 2002, Mammalian Genome.

[77]  R. Kornberg,et al.  A trithorax-group complex purified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for methylation of histone H3 , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  Rein Aasland,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Set1 complex includes an Ash2 homologue and methylates histone 3 lysine 4 , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[79]  T. Magnuson,et al.  Cell and tissue requirements for the gene eed during mouse gastrulation and organogenesis , 2001, Genesis.

[80]  Nevan J. Krogan,et al.  COMPASS: A complex of proteins associated with a trithorax-related SET domain protein , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  J. Walter,et al.  Embryogenesis: Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome , 2000, Nature.

[82]  D. Haber,et al.  DNA Methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b Are Essential for De Novo Methylation and Mammalian Development , 1999, Cell.

[83]  J. Thomson,et al.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. , 1998, Science.

[84]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  DNA hypomethylation can activate Xist expression and silence X-linked genes. , 1996, Genes & development.

[85]  G. Struhl,et al.  A gene product required for correct initiation of segmental determination in Drosophila , 1981, Nature.

[86]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos , 1981, Nature.

[87]  E. Lewis A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila , 1978, Nature.

[88]  Hana Kim,et al.  AEBP2 as a potential targeting protein for Polycomb Repression Complex PRC2 , 2009 .

[89]  David R. Liu,et al.  Conversion of 5-Methylcytosine to 5- Hydroxymethylcytosine in Mammalian DNA by the MLL Partner TET1 , 2009 .

[90]  A. Bird DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. , 2002, Genes & development.

[91]  Matthew Tudor,et al.  Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[92]  M. Surani,et al.  The Polycomb-Group Gene Ezh2 Is Required for Early Mouse Development , 2001 .