Controllable Reset Behavior in Domain Wall–Magnetic Tunnel Junction Artificial Neurons for Task-Adaptable Computation

Neuromorphic computing with spintronic devices has been of interest due to the limitations of CMOS-driven von Neumann computing. Domain wall-magnetic tunnel junction (DW-MTJ) devices have been shown to be able to intrinsically capture biological neuron behavior. Edgy-relaxed behavior, where a frequently firing neuron experiences a lower action potential threshold, may provide additional artificial neuronal functionality when executing repeated tasks. In this study, we demonstrate that this behavior can be implemented in DW-MTJ artificial neurons via three alternative mechanisms: shape anisotropy, magnetic field, and current-driven soft reset. Using micromagnetics and analytical device modeling to classify the Optdigits handwritten digit dataset, we show that edgy-relaxed behavior improves both classification accuracy and classification rate for ordered datasets while sacrificing little to no accuracy for a randomized dataset. This work establishes methods by which artificial spintronic neurons can be flexibly adapted to datasets.

[1]  P. R. Prucnal,et al.  A Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Laser Neuron for Ultrafast Cognitive Computing , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[2]  Alvaro Velasquez,et al.  Domain Wall Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons With Shape-Based Configurable Activation Functions , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[3]  Geoffrey S. D. Beach,et al.  Current-induced domain wall motion , 2008 .

[5]  Joseph S. Friedman,et al.  Shape-Based Magnetic Domain Wall Drift for an Artificial Spintronic Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neuron , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[6]  B. Bean.  The action potential in mammalian central neurons , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  F. García-Sánchez,et al.  The design and verification of MuMax3 , 2014, 1406.7635.

[8]  K. Roy,et al.  Spin-Based Neuron Model With Domain-Wall Magnets as Synapse , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[9]  Manish Kumar.  Large-scale neuromorphic computing systems , 2016 .

[10]  Sally A. McKee,et al.  Hitting the memory wall: implications of the obvious , 1995, CARN.

[11]  Joseph S. Friedman,et al.  Magnetic domain wall neuron with lateral inhibition , 2018, Journal of Applied Physics.

[12]  R. Llinás.  The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: insights into central nervous system function. , 1988, Science.

[13]  Anthony N. Burkitt,et al.  A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  C. A. Ross,et al.  Logic circuit prototypes for three-terminal magnetic tunnel junctions with mobile domain walls , 2016, Nature Communications.

[15]  C. Ross,et al.  Low Energy Magnetic Domain Wall Logic in Short, Narrow, Ferromagnetic Wires , 2012, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[16]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Proposal for an All-Spin Artificial Neural Network: Emulating Neural and Synaptic Functionalities Through Domain Wall Motion in Ferromagnets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[17]  Christopher H. Bennett,et al.  Maximized lateral inhibition in paired magnetic domain wall racetracks for neuromorphic computing , 2019, Nanotechnology.