Improving traffic safety and drivers' behavior in reduced visibility conditions

Moreover, two issues that have not explicitly been addressed in prior studies are; (1) the possibility of predicting VR crashes using traffic data collected from the Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) sensors installed on Expressways and (2) which traffic data is advantageous for predicting VR crashes; LDs or AVIs. Thus, this research attempts to examine the relationships between VR crash risk and real-time traffic data collected from LDs installed on two Freeways in Central Florida (I-4 and I-95) and from AVI sensors installed on two Expressways (SR 408 and SR 417). Also, it investigates which data is better for predicting VR crashes. The approach adopted here involves developing Bayesian matched case-control logistic regression using the historical VR crashes, LDs and AVI data. Regarding models estimated based on LDs data, the average speed observed at the nearest downstream station along with the coefficient of variation in speed observed at the nearest upstream station, all at 5-10 minute prior to the crash time, were found to have significant effect on VR crash risk. However, for the model developed based on AVI data, the coefficient of variation in speed observed at the crash segment, at 5-10 minute prior to the crash time, affected the likelihood of VR crash occurrence. Argument concerning which traffic data (LDs or AVI) is better for predicting VR crashes is also provided and discussed.; The results revealed that gender, age, road type, visibility condition, and familiarity with VSL signs were the significant factors affecting the likelihood of reducing speed following CMS/VSL instructions in reduced visibility conditions. Other objectives of this survey study were to determine the content of messages that would achieve the best perceived safety and drivers' compliance and to examine the best way to improve safety during these adverse visibility conditions. The results indicated that "Caution-fog ahead-reduce speed" was the best message and using CMS and VSL signs together was the best way to improve safety during such inclement weather situations. In addition, this research aimed to thoroughly examine drivers' responses under low visibility conditions and quantify the impacts and values of various factors found to be related to drivers' compliance and drivers' satisfaction with VSL and CMS instructions in different visibility and traffic conditions. To achieve these goals, Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approaches were adopted. The results revealed that drivers' satisfaction with VSL/CMS was the most significant factor that positively affected drivers' compliance with advice or warning messages displayed on VSL/CMS signs under different fog conditions followed by driver factors. Moreover, it was found that roadway type affected drivers' compliance to VSL instructions under medium and heavy fog conditions. Furthermore, drivers' familiarity with VSL signs and driver factors were the significant factors affecting drivers' satisfaction with VSL/CMS advice under…

[1]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[2]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Soil organic carbon concentrations and stocks on Barro Colorado Island — Digital soil mapping using Random Forests analysis , 2008 .

[3]  J. LaFountain Inc. , 2013, American Art.

[4]  M. Haselkorn,et al.  Surveying commuter behavior as a basis for designing motorist information systems , 1989, Conference Record of papers presented at the First Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference (VNIS '89).

[5]  Paul A. Dion,et al.  Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling , 2008 .

[6]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Estimating Traffic Stream Space Mean Speed and Reliability from Dual- and Single-Loop Detectors , 2005 .

[7]  Chris Lee,et al.  Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways , 2002 .

[8]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Steven D Schrock,et al.  Flashing Message Features on Changeable Message Signs , 2006 .

[10]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation , 1997 .

[11]  Edward M Bernat,et al.  Combined effects of alcohol and distraction on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  D Dahlinger,et al.  FOG WARNING SYSTEM PROVIDES A SAFETY NET FOR MOTORISTS , 1995 .

[13]  A S Hakkert,et al.  Risk of a road accident in rainy weather. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  DRIVER UNDERSTANDING OF MESSAGES DISPLAYED ON SEQUENTIAL PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS IN WORK ZONES , 2007 .

[15]  A. Khattak,et al.  Role of Adverse Weather in Key Crash Types on Limited-Access: Roadways Implications for Advanced Weather Systems , 1998 .

[16]  Shih-Miao Chin,et al.  Temporary Losses of Highway Capacity and Impacts on Performance , 2002 .

[17]  Danny Pfeffermann,et al.  Small Area Estimation , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[18]  Jin-Hyuk Chung,et al.  Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Xin-Yuan Song,et al.  Local influence analysis of multivariate probit latent variable models , 2006 .

[20]  Joseph Perrin EFFECTS OF VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SIGNS ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER , 2000 .

[21]  Julia B Edwards,et al.  WEATHER-RELATED ROAD ACCIDENTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES: A SPATIAL ANALYSIS / , 1996 .

[22]  Charles E. Brown Multivariate Probit Analysis , 1998 .

[23]  I. Bross How to use Ridit Analysis , 1958 .

[24]  Don Scott,et al.  Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Assessing Safety on Dutch Freeways with Data from Infrastructure-Based Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2008 .

[26]  P. Harris,et al.  PUBLIC INTEREST IN, AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR, ENHANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION AS PROVIDED BY IVHS IN THE NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA , 1995 .

[27]  S. E. Hills,et al.  Illustration of Bayesian Inference in Normal Data Models Using Gibbs Sampling , 1990 .

[28]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Toll Road Origin-Destination Travel Survey: Internet and Mail-Back Response Analysis and Implications for Future Surveys , 2001 .

[29]  Eric Yamashita,et al.  Measuring Influence of Accessibility on Accident Severity with Structural Equation Modeling , 2011 .

[30]  K. Knapp AN INVESTIGATION OF VOLUME, SAFETY, AND VEHICLE SPEEDS DURING WINTER STORM EVENTS , 2000 .

[31]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[32]  T. Maze,et al.  Whether Weather Matters to Traffic Demand, Traffic Safety, and Traffic Operations and Flow , 2006 .

[33]  Michael Kyte,et al.  IDAHO STORM WARNING SYSTEM OPERATIONAL TEST , 2000 .

[34]  George Yannis,et al.  Modelling driver choices towards accident risk reduction , 2005 .

[35]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Multivariate probit models for conditional claim-types , 2009 .

[36]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Fog- and Smoke-Related Crashes in Florida: Identifying Crash Characteristics, Spatial Distribution, and Injury Severity , 2010 .

[37]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[38]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  Secondary analysis of time of day on simulated driving performance. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[39]  J. Chimka Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition , 2003 .

[40]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Effect of Warning Messages and Variable Speeds in Different Visibility Conditions , 2011 .

[41]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Analysis of strategic planning of Dutch pig farmers using a multivariate probit model , 2003 .

[42]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Assessment of Residential Location Satisfaction in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area , 2010 .

[43]  Ali S Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Experimental evaluation of fog warning system. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[44]  Sanjaya Mishra,et al.  Research methods in the social sciences , 2005 .

[45]  B. Brown,et al.  Seasonal Variation in Frequencies and Rates of Highway Accidents as Function of Severity , 1997 .

[46]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  On the Cost of Partial Observability in the Bivariate Probit Model , 1985 .

[47]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[48]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[49]  Francois Dion,et al.  Estimating dynamic roadway travel times using automatic vehicle identification data for low sampling rates , 2006 .

[50]  Atsushi Ikeda,et al.  Study of driver characteristics using driving simulator considerations on difference in accident avoidance performance due to age , 2002 .

[51]  H. Mahmassani,et al.  Tripmaker choice behavior for shopping trips under real-time information: model formulation and results of stated-preference internet-based interactive experiments , 2003 .

[52]  A bivariate probit approach to the determination of employment: a study of teen employment differentials in Los Angeles County , 2002 .

[53]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[54]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Characteristics of Urban Arterial Crashes Relative to Proximity to Intersections and Injury Severity , 2008 .

[55]  R. Souleyrette,et al.  Impact of Weather on Urban Freeway Traffic Flow Characteristics and Facility Capacity , 2005 .

[56]  A. Fujiwara,et al.  Capturing Travelers' Stated Mode Choice Preferences Under Influence of Income in Yangon City, Myanmar , 2008 .

[57]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  Severity of driver injury and vehicle damage in traffic crashes at intersections: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[58]  M C Pietrzyk,et al.  EVALUATION OF MOTORIST WARNING SYSTEMS FOR FOG-RELATED INCIDENTS IN THE TAMPA BAY AREA , 1997 .

[59]  H. Summala,et al.  Effects of weather and weather forecasts on driver behaviour , 2007 .

[60]  Jin-hui Wang,et al.  Assessing Message Display Formats of Portable Variable Message Signs , 2005 .

[61]  Paul A Pisano,et al.  Research Needs for Weather-Responsive Traffic Management , 2004 .

[62]  Art MacCarley Evaluation of Caltrans District 10 Automated Warning System: Year Two Progress Report , 1999 .

[63]  Ka-Hung Lai,et al.  SP APPROACH TOWARD DRIVER COMPREHENSION OF MESSAGE FORMATS ON VMS , 2000 .

[64]  Wilfrid A. Nixon THE POTENTIAL OF FRICTION AS A TOOL FOR WINTER MAINTENANCE , 1998 .

[65]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Safety of Public Transportation Occupational Drivers: Risk Perception, Attitudes, and Driving Behavior , 2010 .

[66]  Wilfred W Recker,et al.  Freeway safety as a function of traffic flow. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[67]  T. Golob,et al.  A Method for Relating Type of Crash to Traffic Flow Characteristics on Urban Freeways , 2002 .

[68]  Risto Kulmala,et al.  Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on driving speed and headways , 2000 .

[69]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Assessment of freeway traffic parameters leading to lane-change related collisions. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[70]  F Mannering,et al.  Effect of roadway geometrics and environmental factors on rural freeway accident frequencies. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[71]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship , 2010 .

[72]  P Pisano,et al.  BEST PRACTICES FOR ROAD WEATHER MANAGEMENT, VERSION 2.0 , 2003 .

[73]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[74]  John B. Loomis An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior , 1993 .

[75]  S Madanat,et al.  A PROTOTYPE SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME INCIDENT LIKELIHOOD PREDICTION , 1995 .

[76]  Juha Luoma,et al.  Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on reported driver behaviour , 2000 .

[77]  Jean Andrey,et al.  A Temporal Analysis of Weather-related Collision Risk for Ottawa, Canada: 1990-1998 , 2003 .

[78]  NOWCASTING ROAD CONDITIONS -- A SYSTEM IMPROVING TRAFFIC SAFETY IN WINTERTIME , 1996 .

[79]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Identifying crash propensity using specific traffic speed conditions. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[80]  L. Andreone,et al.  THE "DARWIN" DRIVER VISION SUPPORT SYSTEM : ITS POTENTIAL IMPACT ON DRIVING BEHAVIOR AND ROAD SAFETY, IN CONDITIONS OF REDUCED VISIBILITY , 2000 .

[81]  Chien-Jung Lai,et al.  Effects of color scheme and message lines of variable message signs on driver performance. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[82]  Paula Iragüen,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for reducing fatal accident risk in urban areas: an Internet-based Web page stated preference survey. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[83]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[84]  Christopher Schreiner,et al.  Reducing fog-related crashes on the Afton and Fancy Gap Mountain sections of I-64 and I-77 in Virginia , 2002 .

[85]  D. Eisenberg The mixed effects of precipitation on traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[86]  M. Eriksson,et al.  Relationships between road slipperiness, traffic accident risk and winter road maintenance activity , 2000 .

[87]  Sangho Choo,et al.  How do people respond to congestion mitigation policies? A multivariate probit model of the individual consideration of three travel-related strategy bundles , 2008 .

[88]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions , 1998 .

[89]  L. Breiman SOME INFINITY THEORY FOR PREDICTOR ENSEMBLES , 2000 .

[90]  V. Shah,et al.  ANALYSIS OF WEATHER IMPACTS ON TRAFFIC FLOW IN METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, DC , 2003 .

[91]  James O. Berger,et al.  Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Second Edition , 1985 .

[92]  Peter T. Martin,et al.  TESTING THE ADVERSE VISIBILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM EVALUATION (ADVISE) : SAFER DRIVING IN FOG , 2002 .

[93]  E. van den Hoogen,et al.  Control by variable speed signs: results of the Dutch experiment , 1994 .

[94]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Driver response to variable message sign information in London , 2002 .

[95]  G. Correia,et al.  Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal , 2011 .

[96]  T. Golob,et al.  Relationships Among Urban Freeway Accidents, Traffic Flow, Weather and Lighting Conditions , 2001 .

[97]  J. Edwards,et al.  Speed adjustment of motorway commuter traffic to inclement weather , 1999 .

[98]  B. R. Cooper,et al.  Assessment of M25 Automatic Fog-Warning System - Final Report , 1993 .

[99]  Risto Lethonen Multilevel Statistical Models (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[100]  C. Lee,et al.  2003. Real-time crash prediction model for the application to crash prevention in freeway traffic , 2003 .

[101]  V. Sisiopiku,et al.  Relationship Between Volume-to-Capacity Ratios and Accident Rates , 1997 .

[102]  Richard van der Horst,et al.  Evaluation of A16 Motorway Fog-Signaling System with Respect to Driving Behavior , 1997 .

[103]  S. Singh,et al.  DRIVER ATTRIBUTES AND REAR-END CRASH INVOLVEMENT PROPENSITY , 2003 .

[104]  J. G. Wardrop,et al.  Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research , 1952 .

[105]  Christoph Steinbeck,et al.  Building blocks for automated elucidation of metabolites: Machine learning methods for NMR prediction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[106]  Rashad M Hanbali,et al.  ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINTER ROAD MAINTENANCE ON ROAD USERS , 1994 .

[107]  B. Benson MOTORIST ATTITUDES ABOUT CONTENT OF VARIABLE-MESSAGE SIGNS , 1996 .

[108]  Sherif Ishak,et al.  THE IMPACT OF REAL-TIME AND PREDICTIVE TRAFFIC INFORMATION ON TRAVELERS' BEHAVIOR IN THE I-4 CORRIDOR , 2003 .

[109]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  Flashing Messages, Flashing Lines, and Alternating One Line on Changeable Message Signs , 2002 .

[110]  M C Pietrzyk,et al.  Getting Clear on Fog-Related Crashes in Tampa Bay , 2000 .

[111]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Exploring Visibility-Related Crashes on FreewaysBased on Real-Time Traffic Flow Data , 2011 .

[112]  Henrik Jaldell,et al.  Preferences for lives, injuries, and age: a stated preference survey. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[113]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Variable message signs and radio traffic information: An integrated empirical analysis of drivers' route choice behaviour , 1996 .

[114]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs-based traffic information , 2006 .

[115]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Summated Rating Scale Construction An Introduction , 2009 .

[116]  F. Mannering,et al.  Models Of Commuters' Information Use And Route Choice: Initial Results Based On A Southern California Commuter Route Choice Survey , 1993 .

[117]  George J. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Reduced Visibility from Fog on Car-Following Performance , 2008 .