Integrating Technology into Teacher Education: How Online Discussion Can Be Used to Develop Informed and Critical Literacy Teachers.

Abstract This paper reports findings from 6 years of investigation of the use of online discussions with large cohorts of preservice literacy teachers (approximately 150 each year). The report outlines essential components for effective online discussion, noting the challenges involved when aiming for informed and critical literacy discussion among large groups of novice educators. It elaborates on the most successful approach to this undertaking which involved the use of case study scenarios as the focus of discussion. The report argues that the case study discussions were most effective in promoting professional discussion because they allowed a more effective expert role for the instructors.

[1]  K. Holmes,et al.  Analysis of asynchronous online discussion using the SOLO Taxonomy , 2005 .

[2]  Jeanne Sternlicht Chall,et al.  Learning to Read: The Great Debate , 1967 .

[3]  Shihkuan Hsu.  Using case discussion on the web to develop student teacher problem solving skills , 2004 .

[4]  Marion Meiers,et al.  In Teachers' Hands: Effective Literacy Teaching Practices in the Early Years of , 2005 .

[5]  Carl F. Berger,et al.  Integrating technology into teacher education , 1991 .

[6]  Valerie K. Otero,et al.  Integrating Technology into Teacher Education , 2005 .

[7]  L. Anderson.  International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education , 1997 .

[8]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Learning to teach. , 1996 .

[9]  Ken Rowe,et al.  Teaching Reading: Report and Recommendations , 2005 .

[10]  J. Brownlee.  Changes in Primary School Teachers' Beliefs about Knowing: A longitudinal study , 2003 .

[11]  Steven Smith,et al.  Increasing Access to Teacher Preparation: The Effectiveness of Traditional Instructional Methods in an Online Learning Environment , 2000 .

[12]  J. Calderhead,et al.  Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice , 1991 .

[13]  D. Kagan.  Implication of Research on Teacher Belief , 1992 .

[14]  Reesa Sorin,et al.  Webfolio: An online learning community to help link university studies and classroom practice in preservice teacher education , 2004 .

[15]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[16]  E. Eisner.  Learning and teaching the ways of knowing , 1985 .

[17]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence , 2000 .

[18]  A. Bangert.  The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[20]  L. Sutherland,et al.  From face-to-face to blended learning: Issues and challenges in redesigning a professional course , 2005 .

[21]  B. Green,et al.  Aliens in the Classroom , 1993 .

[22]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[23]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Interaction online: Above and beyond requirements of assessment , 2002 .

[24]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Activity Theory and Higher Education: evaluating learning technologies , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[26]  Robert Andersson,et al.  Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  C. Kardash,et al.  Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. , 1996 .