Student perception of academic grading: Personality, academic orientation, and effort

Factors influencing student perceptions of academic grading were examined, with an emphasis on furthering understanding of the relevance of effort to students’ conceptualization of grading. Students demonstrated a conceptualization of grading where effort should be weighted comparably to actual performance in importance to the composition of a grade, with the expectation that grade allocation should reflect this perception. Students suggested a compensatory effect of effort in grade assignment, where a subjectively perceived high level of effort was expected to supplement low performance on a task. Furthermore, students perceived professors as less fair and less competent when they were perceived to not be able to adequately account for students’ subjective perception of effort. In addition, student perceptions of grading were examined in relation to student-possessed learning orientation (LO), grade orientation (GO), and aspects of personality. Prototypically, individuals high in LO tend to be motivated by the acquisition of knowledge, while those high in GO tend to be driven by the acquisition of high grades. Conscientiousness, openness and age contributed significantly to and positively predicted LO. Inversely, conscientiousness, openness and age contributed significantly to and negatively predicted GO while neuroticism positively predicted this orientation. Students appear to place a heavy amount of importance on professor consideration of effort, despite recognizing the realistic difficulties in determining effort. The potential for an emerging student mentality is discussed, where students’ perception of grading is distorted by a subjective appraisal of their own effort.

[1]  Jeffrey B. Adams What Makes the Grade? Faculty and Student Perceptions , 2005 .

[2]  Nancy Rost Goulden,et al.  Comparison of University Faculty and Student Beliefs about the Meaning of Grades. , 1997 .

[3]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Self-Entitled College Students: Contributions of Personality, Parenting, and Motivational Factors , 2008 .

[4]  J. Eison Educational and Personal Dimensions of Learning- and Grade-Oriented Students , 1982 .

[5]  K. Scouller The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[6]  J. Eison A New Instrument for Assessing Students' Orientations towards Grades and Learning , 1981 .

[7]  L. M. Aleamoni Student Rating Myths Versus Research Facts from 1924 to 1998 , 1999 .

[8]  O. John,et al.  Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German , 2007 .

[9]  Roger Slj Learning approach and outcome: Some empirical observations , 1981 .

[10]  S. Page,et al.  Learning- and Grade-Orientation, Sex, and Prediction of Self-Reported Academic Performance , 2003, Psychological reports.

[11]  Howard R. Pollio,et al.  Educational and personal characteristics of four different types of learning- and grade-oriented students , 1986 .

[12]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[13]  K. Mellanby Grade expectations , 1977, Nature.

[14]  H. Marsh,et al.  Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. , 1997 .

[15]  J. Monterosso,et al.  Moralization of College Grading: Performance, Effort, and Moral Worth , 2003 .