Is information systems a science? an inquiry into the nature of the information systems discipline

The Information Systems (IS) discipline is apparently undergoing an identity crisis. Academicians question the need for IS departments in colleges stating the absence of a core for the field and its integration within other business functions as a basis for its elimination. At the same time, many practitioners, as reflected in the US government's recent IT labor shortage report, continue to ignore IS as a distinct field of study. This article briefly outlines these and other challenges and argues that notwithstanding underlying philosophical differences, it can be concluded that IS is an emerging scientific discipline. This conclusion is reached through an assessment of the debate surrounding the issue of whether IS should be a discipline and an analysis of the IS discipline using some key characteristics of "science." The arguments put forth in this paper have four key implications for the IS community: a continuing emphasis on adopting scientific principles and practices for conducting inquiry into IS phenomena; an enhancement of the self-concept of IS academics and professionals through a common identity; enhances the ability of supporters of the IS field to defend against criticisms, integration with other disciplines, and resource rivalry; and creates the potential of being well-situated to building a cumulative tradition in the field.

[1]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[3]  Andrew L. Friedman,et al.  The Information Technology Field: Using Fields and Paradigms for Analyzing Technological Change , 1994 .

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The IS Expectation Gap: Industry Expectations Versus Academic Preparation , 1993, MIS Q..

[6]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992 , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Limitations of information systems theory and practice: a case for pluralism , 1995, ISCO.

[8]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  J CulnanMary Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: a co-citation analysis , 1987 .

[10]  Ma. de la Natividad Jiménez Salas,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry , 1967 .

[11]  Allen S. Lee Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[12]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Truth in Marketing Theory and Research , 1990 .

[13]  P. Ingwersen Information and Information Science in Context , 1992 .

[14]  S. Hunt Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science , 1990 .

[15]  S. S. Kind It all depends on what you mean by , 1991 .

[16]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and foundations: an inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology , 1993 .

[18]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[19]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Leaders Assess the Current State of the Academic IS Discipline , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems, 1980-1984: Points of Work and Reference , 1986, MIS Q..

[21]  Rosemary Whip,et al.  Strategies for Social Research , 1992 .

[22]  C. Avgerou,et al.  The academic field of information systems in Europe , 1999 .

[23]  Varun Grover,et al.  The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information Systems and Qualitative Research , 1997, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[25]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[26]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Empirical research in information systems: on the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research , 1999 .

[27]  Il Im,et al.  Topics of interest in IS: comparing academic journals with the practitioner press , 1997, ICIS '97.

[28]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Lucas D. Introna,et al.  Imagine : thought experiments in information systems research , 1997 .

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  THE POVERTY OF SCIENTISM IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[32]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[33]  G. Morgan,et al.  Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. , 1984 .

[34]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[35]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Marketing is... , 1992 .

[36]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  R. Hirschheim INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[38]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[39]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[40]  Eckhard D. Falkenberg,et al.  A Framework of Information System Concepts (The FRISCO Report) , 1998 .

[41]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Computing as a discipline , 1989, Computer.

[42]  Allen S. Lee Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .

[43]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions , 1987, CSUR.

[44]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[45]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  IS 2002 Model Curriculum and Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems , 1996, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Marketing Theory: The Philosophy Of Marketing Science , 1983 .

[47]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? , 1999 .

[48]  Donald H. Drury,et al.  A Historiographical Examination of Information Systems , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  J. Olaisen,et al.  Information science : from the development of the discipline to social interaction , 1996 .