A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research

The paper motivates, presents, demonstrates in use, and evaluates a methodology for conducting design science (DS) research in information systems (IS). DS is of importance in a discipline oriented to the creation of successful artifacts. Several researchers have pioneered DS research in IS, yet over the past 15 years, little DS research has been done within the discipline. The lack of a methodology to serve as a commonly accepted framework for DS research and of a template for its presentation may have contributed to its slow adoption. The design science research methodology (DSRM) presented here incorporates principles, practices, and procedures required to carry out such research and meets three objectives: it is consistent with prior literature, it provides a nominal process model for doing DS research, and it provides a mental model for presenting and evaluating DS research in IS. The DS process includes six steps: problem identification and motivation, definition of the objectives for a solution, design and development, demonstration, evaluation, and communication. We demonstrate and evaluate the methodology by presenting four case studies in terms of the DSRM, including cases that present the design of a database to support health assessment methods, a software reuse measure, an Internet video telephony application, and an IS planning method. The designed methodology effectively satisfies the three objectives and has the potential to help aid the acceptance of DS research in the IS discipline.

[1]  Alessandro Orso,et al.  Techniques for Classifying Executions of Deployed Software to Support Software Engineering Tasks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[2]  P. Järvinen Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[3]  Jerome A. Rolia,et al.  A Synthetic Workload Generation Technique for Stress Testing Session-Based Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[4]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  SIP-based enterprise converged networks for voice/video-over-IP: implementation and evaluation of components , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Joan Ernst van Aken,et al.  Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes , 2005 .

[6]  T. Saarinen,et al.  Managing Business in a Multi-Channel World: Success Factors for E-Business , 2005 .

[7]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Planning for IS applications: a practical, information theoretical method and case study in mobile financial services , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Taxonomy of Telemedicine Efforts with Respect to Applications, Infrastructure, Delivery Tools, Type of Setting and Purpose , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Nikolay Mehandjiev,et al.  A framework for classifying intelligent design theories , 2004, WISER '04.

[10]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Middleware for Scalable Real-time Multimedia Cyberinfrastructure , 2004 .

[11]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  What Is Design in the Context of Human-Centered Computing? , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[12]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Data Analytics for Bioterrorism Surveillance , 2004, ISI.

[13]  R. Ross Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[14]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[15]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  A Unified Model of Requirements Elicitation , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[17]  Lascelles Adams,et al.  Achieving relevance in IS research via the DAGS framework , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[18]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  Affective computing in tele-home health , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[19]  Marcus A. Rothenberger,et al.  Project-Level Reuse Factors: Drivers for Variation within Software Development Environments , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[20]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Design and Development of a SIP-based Video Conferencing Application , 2003, HSNMC.

[21]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Extending Critical Success Factors Methodology to Facilitate Broadly Participative Information Systems Planning , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Bioterrorism Surveillance with Real-Time Data Warehousing , 2003, ISI.

[23]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Catch data warehouse: support for community health care decision-making , 2003, Decision Support Systems.

[24]  William L. Smith,et al.  AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Multiparty Negotiation Support: The Role of Visualization’s Influence on the Development of Shared Mental Models , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  A. Bouguettaya,et al.  Healthcare data warehousing and quality assurance , 2001 .

[28]  James C. Hershauer,et al.  A software reuse measure: Monitoring an enterprise-level model driven development process , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis Contrasting Information Systems Development Approaches and Methodologies , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  J Studnicki,et al.  A community health report card: comprehensive assessment for tracking community health (CATCH). , 1997, Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application.

[31]  S. Sivaloganathan,et al.  A Survey of Design Philosophies, Models, Methods and Systems , 1996 .

[32]  A. J. Fulcher,et al.  Towards a Strategic Framework for Design Research , 1996 .

[33]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Executive Support Systems and Learning: A Model and Empirical Test , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  N.F.M. Roozenburg,et al.  A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences , 1991 .

[37]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems development in information systems research , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[38]  TakedaHideaki,et al.  Modeling design processes , 1990 .

[39]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[40]  A. J. Buglass Glossary , 1979, Adiós Muchachos.

[41]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[42]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[43]  D. M. Ha,et al.  A gentle introduction , 2006 .

[44]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[45]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[46]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 2004 .

[47]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Healthcare Data Warehousing and Quality Assurance , 2001, Computer.

[48]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning With New Products : Doing It Right , 2000 .

[49]  Kent McPhee,et al.  Design Theory and Software Design , 1996 .

[50]  J. Klassi,et al.  Environmental enhancement of the oceans by increased solar radiation from space , 1985, OCEANS '85 - Ocean Engineering and the Environment.

[51]  J. Rockart Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[52]  L. B. Archer,et al.  Systematic method for designers , 1963 .