Modelling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts

Tool nose design affects the surface finish and productivity in finish hard turning processes. Surface finishing and tool flank wear have been investigated in finish turning of AISI D2 steels (60 HRC) using ceramic wiper (multi-radii) design inserts. Multiple linear regression models and neural network models are developed for predicting surface roughness and tool flank wear. In neural network modelling, measured forces, power and specific forces are utilized in training algorithm. Experimental results indicate that surface roughness Ra values as low as 0.18–0.20m are attainable with wiper tools. Tool flank wear reaches to a tool life criterion value of VBC = 0.15 mm before or around 15 min of cutting time at high cutting speeds due to elevated temperatures. Neural network based predictions of surface roughness and tool flank wear are carried out and compared with a non-training experimental data. These results show that neural network models are suitable to predict tool wear and surface roughness patterns for a range of cutting conditions. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. M. Barash,et al.  Cutting mechanism during machining of hardened steel , 1987 .

[2]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Advanced Tool Edge Geometry for High Precision Hard Turning , 2005 .

[3]  Y. Kevin Chou,et al.  Tool wear mechanism in continuous cutting of hardened tool steels , 1997 .

[4]  Gerry Byrne,et al.  Cutting tool wear in the machining of hardened steels , 2001 .

[5]  W. König,et al.  Turning versus grinding: a comparison of surface integrity aspects and attainable accuracies , 1993 .

[6]  Hans Kurt Tönshoff,et al.  Cutting of Hardened Steel , 2000 .

[7]  Fukuo Hashimoto,et al.  Surface Integrity Generated by Precision Hard Turning , 1999 .

[8]  Moshe M. Barash,et al.  Experimental investigation on cubic boron nitride turning of hardened AISI 52100 steel , 2003 .

[9]  W. Grzesik,et al.  Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts , 2006 .

[10]  Tuğrul Özel,et al.  Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks , 2005 .

[11]  Y. K. Chou,et al.  Experimental investigation on CBN turning of hardened AISI 52100 steel , 2002 .

[12]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Machinability evaluation in hard turning of cold work tool steel (D2) with ceramic tools using statistical techniques , 2007 .

[13]  A. Abrão,et al.  Hard turning: AISI 4340 high strength low alloy steel and AISI D2 cold work tool steel , 2005 .

[14]  T. Özel,et al.  Effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and forces in finish turning of hardened AISI H13 steel , 2005 .

[15]  T. Hodgson,et al.  Turning Hardened Tool Steels with Cubic Boron Nitride Inserts , 1981 .

[16]  Y. K. Chou,et al.  Tool nose radius effects on finish hard turning , 2004 .

[17]  Shreyes N. Melkote,et al.  Effect of Cutting-Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Residual Stresses in Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel , 1999, Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[18]  G. Boothroyd,et al.  Fundamentals of machining and machine tools , 2006 .

[19]  R. Komanduri,et al.  Machining of Hard Materials , 1984 .