Utterance selection model of language change.

We present a mathematical formulation of a theory of language change. The theory is evolutionary in nature and has close analogies with theories of population genetics. The mathematical structure we construct similarly has correspondences with the Fisher-Wright model of population genetics, but there are significant differences. The continuous time formulation of the model is expressed in terms of a Fokker-Planck equation. This equation is exactly soluble in the case of a single speaker and can be investigated analytically in the case of multiple speakers who communicate equally with all other speakers and give their utterances equal weight. Whilst the stationary properties of this system have much in common with the single-speaker case, time-dependent properties are richer. In the particular case where linguistic forms can become extinct, we find that the presence of many speakers causes a two-stage relaxation, the first being a common marginal distribution that persists for a long time as a consequence of ultimate extinction being due to rare fluctuations.

[1]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  The Production of Speech , 2011, Springer New York.

[2]  J. W. Minett,et al.  The invasion of language: emergence, change and death. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Greece,et al.  Language evolution and population dynamics in a system of two interacting species , 2005, cond-mat/0502118.

[4]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Win–stay, lose–shift in language learning from peers , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Lyle Jenkins,et al.  Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics , 2004 .

[6]  P. Trudgill,et al.  New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution , 2004 .

[7]  P. Trudgill.  Book Note: New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes , 2004 .

[8]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The Effects of Genetic and Geographic Structure on Neutral Variation , 2003 .

[9]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Linguistics: Modelling the dynamics of language death , 2003, Nature.

[10]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.

[11]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Language dynamics in finite populations. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The Darwinization of Linguistics , 2002 .

[13]  A. Monaco,et al.  Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Natural Language From Artificial Life , 2002, Artificial Life.

[15]  Peter Gilles,et al.  Identification of Regional Varieties by Intonational Cues , 2002, Language and speech.

[16]  Joan Bybee.  Phonology and Language Use , 2001, Phonetica.

[17]  James F. Crow,et al.  The beanbag lives on , 2001, Nature.

[18]  M A Nowak,et al.  Evolution of universal grammar. , 2001, Science.

[19]  D. Hull.  Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science , 2000 .

[20]  R. Buerger.  The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation , 2000 .

[21]  Partha Niyogi,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Language Learning , 1997 .

[22]  W. Bruce Croft.  On language change: The invisible hand in language , 1997 .

[23]  N. Takahata.  Genealogy of neutral genes and spreading of selected mutations in a geographically structured population. , 1991, Genetics.

[24]  T. Ohta,et al.  The Average Number of Generations until Fixation of a Mutant Gene in a Finite Population. , 1969, Genetics.

[25]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[26]  D. R. Cox.  Journal of Applied Probability , 1964, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin.

[27]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  Random processes in genetics , 1958, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[28]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. , 1931 .

[29]  S. Wright.  Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[30]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[31]  Michael Cysouw,et al.  [Review of] Explaining language change : an evolutionary approach / William Croft. - Harlow: Pearson Education 2000, XV, 287 S. (Longman Linguistics Library) , 2006 .

[32]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[33]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[34]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach , 2002 .

[35]  S. Mufwene.  The ecology of language evolution , 2001 .

[36]  G. McVean,et al.  An introduction to population genetics , 2022 .

[37]  William Croft,et al.  Explaining language change : an evolutionary approach , 2000 .

[38]  W. Labov.  Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[39]  C. R. Grontkowski.  Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science , 1992 .

[40]  H. Risken.  Fokker-Planck Equation , 1984 .

[41]  C. Gardiner.  Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[42]  J. Kingman.  On the genealogy of large populations , 1982, Journal of Applied Probability.

[43]  Lesley Milroy,et al.  Language and social networks , 1980 .

[44]  J. Scharf.  [Language evolution]. , 1973, Gegenbaurs morphologisches Jahrbuch.

[45]  and as an in , 2022 .