Environ centrality reveals the tendency of indirect effects to homogenize the functional importance of species in ecosystems.

Ecologists and conservation biologists need to identify the relative importance of species to make sound management decisions and effectively allocate scarce resources. We introduce a new method, termed environ centrality, to determine the relative importance of a species in an ecosystem network with respect to ecosystem energy-matter exchange. We demonstrate the uniqueness of environ centrality by comparing it to other common centrality metrics and then show its ecological significance. Specifically, we tested two hypotheses on a set of 50 empirically based ecosystem network models. The first concerned the distribution of centrality in the community. We hypothesized that the functional importance of species would tend to be concentrated into a few dominant species followed by a group of species with lower, more even importance as is often seen in dominance-diversity curves. Second, we tested the systems ecology hypothesis that indirect relationships homogenize the functional importance of species in ecosystems. Our results support both hypotheses and highlight the importance of detritus and nutrient recyclers such as fungi and bacteria in generating the energy-matter flow in ecosystems. Our homogenization results suggest that indirect effects are important in part because they tend to even the importance of species in ecosystems. A core contribution of this work is that it creates a formal, mathematical method to quantify the importance species play in generating ecosystem activity by integrating direct, indirect, and boundary effects in ecological systems.

[1]  Brian D. Fath,et al.  Network analysis applied to large-scale cyber-ecosystems , 2004 .

[2]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[4]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  T. Whitham,et al.  A genetic basis to community repeatability and stability. , 2010, Ecology.

[6]  Robert W. Bosserman,et al.  17 – Propagation of Cause in Ecosystems , 1976 .

[7]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  The Comparative Ecology of Six Marine Ecosystems , 1991 .

[8]  R. Damé,et al.  Analysis of Energy Flows in an lntertidal Oyster Reef , 1981 .

[9]  R. May Food webs. , 1983, Science.

[10]  D. Mason,et al.  Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion , 2009 .

[11]  Brian D. Fath,et al.  Quantifying resource homogenization using network flow analysis , 1999 .

[12]  B. Parker,et al.  Proceedings of the Colloquium on Conservation Problems in Antarctica, held on 10-12 September, 1971, Blacksburg, Virginia , 1972 .

[13]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity , 1985 .

[14]  Fundamental Processes in Ecology: An Earth Systems Approach , 2006 .

[15]  Brian D. Fath,et al.  A MATLABreg function for Network Environ Analysis , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Comparative ecosystem trophic structure of three U.S. mid-Atlantic estuaries , 1997 .

[18]  J. Link,et al.  The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): Ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics , 2008 .

[19]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Rapid development of indirect effects in ecological networks , 2010 .

[20]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Systems Approach to the Concept of Environment , 1978 .

[21]  R. H. Whittaker,et al.  Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities , 1965, Science.

[22]  J. Webster,et al.  Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems , 2005 .

[23]  J. Rusak,et al.  Disturbance-driven changes in the variability of ecological patterns and processes. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[24]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[25]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Steady state of ecosystem flow networks: a comparison between balancing procedures , 2003 .

[26]  John T. Finn,et al.  Flow analysis of models of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem. , 1980 .

[27]  B. Potts,et al.  A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  F. Jordán,et al.  Quantifying positional importance in food webs: A comparison of centrality indices , 2007 .

[29]  B. Elkaim,et al.  Analysis of the trophic network of a macrotidal ecosystem: the Bay of Somme (Eastern Channel) , 2003 .

[30]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Node centrality indices in food webs: Rank orders versus distributions , 2010 .

[31]  R. Christian,et al.  Uncertainty and the Use of Network Analysis for Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management , 2006 .

[32]  John H. Lawton,et al.  What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[33]  John R. Schramski,et al.  Network environ theory, simulation, and EcoNet® 2.0 , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  R. Ulanowicz,et al.  Unexpected Effects of Predators Upon Their Prey: The Case of the American Alligator , 1999, Ecosystems.

[35]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[36]  D. Mason,et al.  Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion , 2009 .

[37]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[38]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Review of the Foundations of Network Environ Analysis , 1999, Ecosystems.

[39]  R. Ulanowicz,et al.  The Seasonal Dynamics of The Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem , 1989 .

[40]  Brian D. Fath,et al.  Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems:: Distributed control in the environ networks of a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River Estuary, USA—Steady-state analysis , 2006 .

[41]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  Aquatic Food Webs: An Ecosystem Approach , 2008 .

[42]  F. Jordán,et al.  Quantifying the importance of species and their interactions in a host-parasitoid community , 2003 .

[43]  Cynthia M. Lakon,et al.  How Correlated Are Network Centrality Measures? , 2008, Connections.

[44]  D. Baird,et al.  Energy flow of a boreal intertidal ecosystem, the Sylt-Rømø Bight , 2004 .

[45]  Sven E. Jørgensen,et al.  A New Ecology: Systems Perspective , 2007 .

[46]  R. Elmgren,et al.  Carbon flows in Baltic Sea food webs — a re-evaluation using a mass balance approach , 2000 .

[47]  J. Wootton,et al.  The Nature and Consequences of Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1994 .

[48]  S. Allesina,et al.  Ecological subsystems via graph theory: the role of strongly connected components , 2005 .

[49]  Michael Bryunsky 2 – Steady-State Sensitivity Analysis of Energy Flow in a Marine Ecosystem , 1972 .

[50]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Benthic-pelagic switching in a coastal subtropical lagoon , 1999 .

[51]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  D. Eggleston,et al.  Computer simulations of wind-induced Estuarine circulation patterns and estuary-shelf exchange processes : The potential role of wind forcing on larval transport , 1999 .

[53]  A. Agrawal,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Evolutionary Trade-offs in Plants Mediate the Strength of Trophic Cascades , 2022 .

[54]  Brian D Fath,et al.  Functional integration of ecological networks through pathway proliferation. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  Andria K. Salas,et al.  Evidence for resource homogenization in 50 trophic ecosystem networks , 2010, 1104.0021.

[56]  J. Berger,et al.  Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn. , 2008, Ecology.

[57]  Stuart R. Borrett,et al.  Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks , 2010, 1009.1841.

[58]  Louis-Félix Bersier,et al.  QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTORS OF FOOD-WEB MATRICES , 2002 .

[59]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations , 2004 .

[60]  Stuart R. Borrett,et al.  Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems: Temporal variation of indirect effects in a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River Estuary, USA—Time series analysis , 2006 .

[61]  G. Likens,et al.  Carbon Flow in Four Lake Ecosystems: A Structural Approach , 1978, Science.

[62]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Dominance of Indirect Causality in Ecosystems , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[63]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[64]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity Fish predation and herbivory can regulate lake ecosystems , 2007 .

[65]  Johanna J. Heymans,et al.  A carbon flow model and network analysis of the northern Benguela upwelling system, Namibia , 2000 .

[66]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Defining and measuring trophic role similarity in food webs using regular equivalence. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[67]  C. Townsend,et al.  Biological invasions and the dynamics of endemic diseases in freshwater ecosystems , 2011 .

[68]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[69]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Trophic Structure and Productivity of Silver Springs, Florida , 1957 .

[70]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[71]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[72]  D. Baird,et al.  Assessment of spatial and temporal variability in ecosystem attributes of the St Marks national wildlife refuge, Apalachee bay, Florida , 1998 .

[73]  L. Tilly,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Cone Spring , 1968 .

[74]  Robert R. Christian,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF HYPOXIA ON ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ENERGY DIVERSION FROM CONSUMERS TO MICROBES , 2004 .

[75]  H. Milne,et al.  Energy flow in the Ythan Estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland , 1981 .

[76]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Ecological network analysis of an urban water metabolic system: model development, and a case study for Beijing. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[77]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[78]  Britta Ruhnau,et al.  Eigenvector-centrality - a node-centrality? , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[79]  Ricard V Solé,et al.  Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. , 2009, Ecology.