Antecedent Containment: A Dependency Grammar Solution in Terms of Catenae

.  The paper presents a new solution to an old problem, the problem of antecedent containment and the infinite regress that it gives rise to. The solution is couched in a dependency grammar (DG) framework and is possible by acknowledging DG catenae. The catena is a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Pronouns that appear to be contained within their antecedents actually take non-constituent catenae as their antecedents. These catenae quite naturally exclude the pronouns, so that antecedent containment never occurs. This account acknowledges surface configurations only. No appeals are made to derivational mechanisms or abstract representations.

[1]  Hans-Werner Eroms.  Syntax der deutschen Sprache , 2000 .

[2]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Gapping Is Not (VP-) Ellipsis , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  D. Fox.  Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[4]  Ludwig M. Eichinger,et al.  Dependenz und Valenz : ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung , 2003 .

[5]  Timothy Osborne,et al.  Shared Material and Grammar: Toward A Dependency Grammar Theory of Non-Gapping Coordination for English and German , 2006 .

[6]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What it Can't, but not Why * , 2008 .

[7]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Catenae: Introducing a Novel Unit of Syntactic Analysis , 2012 .

[8]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: reply to Baltin , 1990 .

[9]  Kyle Johnson.  Against the notion 'SUBJECT' , 1987 .

[10]  Willy Van Langendonck,et al.  Determiners as heads , 1994 .

[11]  Isabelle Haik,et al.  Bound VPs that need to be , 1987 .

[12]  Kalevi Tarvainen.  Einführung in die Dependenzgrammatik , 1983 .

[13]  J. Hoeksema,et al.  A condition on circular chains: a restatement of i-within-i , 1990, Journal of Linguistics.

[14]  Jane J. Robinson.  Dependency Structures and Transformational Rules , 1970 .

[15]  M. Pickering,et al.  Dependency categorial grammar and coordination , 1993 .

[16]  ROBERT MAY,et al.  Questions, quantifiers and crossing , 1981 .

[17]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Language acquisition and the form of the grammar , 2000 .

[18]  H. Harley.  WCO, ACD, and QR of DPs , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[19]  D. G. Hays.  Dependency Theory: A Formalism and Some Observations , 1964 .

[20]  Timothy Osborne,et al.  Major constituents and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination , 2008 .

[21]  C. Pollard.  Anhaphors in English and the scope of binding theory , 1992 .

[22]  Mark Baltin,et al.  The Interaction of Ellipsis and Binding: Implications for the Sequencing of Principle A , 2003 .