Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation.

DAMAGE to striate cortex and neighbouring regions in man is well known to produce severe loss of visual capacity in correlated legions of the visual field (Holmes, 1918; Teuber, Battersby and Bender, 1960). Depending on the duration, nature and extent of the damage, and the method of measurement, the resultant blindness may be more or less absolute. In the most extreme examples, a patient may acknowledge no visual information or only the onset or offset of a light in the scotoma. In less extreme cases vigorously moving or flickering stimuli may be seen (Riddoch, 1917). It is generally held, however, that man is more severely impaired by damage to the visual cortex than the monkey, even though the anatomical organizations of the visual pathways and cortex are closely similar. Indeed, the more thoroughly the monkey has been studied, the more remarkable has been the extent of residual visual capacity found: for example, the ability to discriminate twodimensional patterns even when the whole of the striate cortex has been removed, with complete retrograde degeneration of the dorsal lateral geniculate nuclei (Pasik and Pasik, 1971). It has even been suggested that the monkey without striate cortex may be capable of qualitatively normal pattern vision but with reduced visual acuity (Weiskrantz, 1972; cf. Ward and Masterton, 1970). Recent animal results, however, also suggest strongly that a severe penalty is inflicted when damage to neighbouring posterior cortical areas is added to that of the striate cortex (Pasik and Pasik, 1971). For this reason, human cases in which damage is relatively restricted to area 17 (the only known cortical projection from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus), with only minimal damage to surrounding tissue, have a renewed interest. There also have been suggestions, based on animal research, that the type of visual information processed by the direct pathway from the retina to the mid-brain is qualitatively different from that by the geniculo-cortical route (the "two visual system" hypothesis: Schneider, 1969; Trevarthen, 1968; Ingle, 1967). The former, it has been claimed, is primarily concerned with the detection of "salient" visual events in space and the control of ocular fixation, and the latter with the identification

[1]  M. Cynader,et al.  Response characteristics of single cells in the monkey superior colliculus following ablation or cooling of visual cortex. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  G. Riddoch DISSOCIATION OF VISUAL PERCEPTIONS DUE TO OCCIPITAL INJURIES, WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO APPRECIATION OF MOVEMENT , 1917 .

[3]  M E Wilson,et al.  Retino-tectal and cortico-tectal projections in Macaca mulatta. , 1970, Brain research.

[4]  G. Schneider Two visual systems. , 1969, Science.

[5]  Jeannette P. Ward,et al.  Encephalization and visual cortex in the Tree Shrew (Tupaia glis). , 1970 .

[6]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  Filling in the scotoma: A study of residual vision after striate cortex lesions in monkeys , 1970 .

[7]  R W Sperry,et al.  Perceptual unity of the ambient visual field in human commissurotomy patients. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  G. Holmes DISTURBANCES OF VISION BY CEREBRAL LESIONS , 1918, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  A Perimetric Study of Visual Field Defects in Monkeys , 1963 .

[10]  N K Humphrey,et al.  What the frog's eye tells the monkey's brain. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[11]  R. Held,et al.  Residual Visual Function after Brain Wounds involving the Central Visual Pathways in Man , 1973, Nature.

[12]  A. Cowey,et al.  Striate cortex lesions and visual acuity of the rhesus monkey. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  A. Cowey,et al.  Perimetric Study of Field Defects in Monkeys after Cortical and Retinal Ablations , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  W Lewin,et al.  Cortical blindness and the functions of the non-geniculate fibres of the optic tracts. , 1969, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  D. Vail,et al.  Visual Field Defects after Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain , 1961 .

[16]  D. Ingle Two visual mechanisms underlying the behavior of fish , 1967, Psychologische Forschung.

[17]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Two mechanisms of vision in primates , 1968, Psychologische Forschung.

[18]  M. B. Bender,et al.  BOOK REVIEWS , 2003 .

[19]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Review Lecture - Behavioural analysis of the monkey’s visual nervous system , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  M. Gazzaniga The Bisected Brain , 1970 .

[21]  B Masterton,et al.  Encephalization and visual cortex in the Tree Shrew (Tupaia glis). , 1970, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[22]  E. Warrington,et al.  "Blindsight": Vision in a field defect. , 1974, Lancet.

[23]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Vision in Monkeys after Removal of the Striate Cortex , 1967, Nature.

[24]  P Pasik,et al.  The visual world of monkeys deprived of striate cortex: effective stimulus parameters and the importance of the accessory optic system. , 1971, Vision research.