PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to examine the variations of CT dose index (CTDI) efficiencies, ε(CTDI(100))=CTDI(100)/CTDI(∞), with bowtie filters and CT scanner types.
METHODS
This was an extension of our previous study [Li, Zhang, and Liu, Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 5789-5803 (2011)]. A validated Monte Carlo program was used to calculate ε(CTDI(100)) on a Siemens Somatom Definition scanner. The ε(CTDI(100)) dependencies on tube voltages and beam widths were tested in previous studies. The influences of different bowtie filters and CT scanner types were examined in this work. The authors tested the variations of ε(CTDI(100)) with bowtie filters on the Siemens Definition scanner. The authors also analyzed the published CTDI measurements of four independent studies on five scanners of four models from three manufacturers.
RESULTS
On the Siemens Definition scanner, the difference in ε(CTDI(W)) between using the head and body bowtie filters was 2.5% (maximum) in the CT scans of the 32-cm phantom, and 1.7% (maximum) in the CT scans of the 16-cm phantom. Compared with CTDI(W), the weighted CTDI(∞) increased by 30.5% (on average) in the 32-cm phantom, and by 20.0% (on average) in the 16-cm phantom. These results were approximately the same for 80-140 kV and 1-40 mm beam widths (4.2% maximum deviation). The differences in ε(CTDI(100)) between the simulations and the direct measurements of four previous studies were 1.3%-5.0% at the center∕periphery of the 16-cm∕32-cm phantom (on average).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with CTDI(vol), the equilibrium dose for large scan lengths is 30.5% higher in the 32-cm phantom, and is 20.0% higher in the 16-cm phantom. The relative increases are practically independent of tube voltages (80-140 kV), beam widths (up to 4 cm), and the CT scanners covered in this study.
[1]
R. Dixon,et al.
Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber: beyond CTDI100.
,
2007,
Medical physics.
[2]
J. Boone,et al.
Cone beam CT dosimetry: A unified and self-consistent approach including all scan modalities-With or without phantom motion.
,
2010,
Medical physics.
[3]
J. Boone,et al.
Analytical equations for CT dose profiles derived using a scatter kernel of Monte Carlo parentage with broad applicability to CT dosimetry problems.
,
2011,
Medical physics.
[4]
C. Ruan,et al.
Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology.
,
2010,
Medical physics.
[5]
J. Hsieh,et al.
TU‐A‐201B‐05: Radiation Dose Penalty in Axial Mode CT
,
2010
.
[6]
W. Huda,et al.
X-ray beam filtration, dosimetry phantom size and CT patient dose conversion factors
,
2010,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[7]
K. Murase,et al.
Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry.
,
2005,
Medical physics.
[8]
Xinhua Li,et al.
A practical approach to estimate the weighted CT dose index over an infinite integration length
,
2011,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[9]
N. Theocharopoulos,et al.
Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners
,
2007,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[10]
John M Boone,et al.
The trouble with CTD100.
,
2007,
Medical physics.