Discrete Patterns of Cross-Hemispheric Functional Connectivity Underlie Impairments of Spatial Cognition after Stroke

Despite intense research, the neural correlates of stroke-induced deficits of spatial cognition remain controversial. For example, several cortical regions and white-matter tracts have been designated as possible anatomic predictors of spatial neglect. However, many studies focused on local anatomy, an approach that does not harmonize with the notion that brain-behavior relationships are flexible and may involve interactions among distant regions. Despite intense research, the neural correlates of stroke-induced deficits of spatial cognition remain controversial. For example, several cortical regions and white-matter tracts have been designated as possible anatomic predictors of spatial neglect. However, many studies focused on local anatomy, an approach that does not harmonize with the notion that brain-behavior relationships are flexible and may involve interactions among distant regions. We studied in humans of either sex resting-state fMRI connectivity associated with performance in line bisection, reading and visual search, tasks commonly used for he clinical diagnosis of neglect. We defined left and right frontal, parietal, and temporal areas as seeds (or regions of interest, ROIs), and measured whole-brain seed-based functional connectivity (FC) and ROI-to-ROI connectivity in subacute right-hemisphere stroke patients. Performance on the line bisection task was associated with decreased FC between the right fusiform gyrus and left superior occipital cortex. Complementary increases and decreases of connectivity between both temporal and occipital lobes predicted reading errors. In addition, visual search deficits were associated with modifications of FC between left and right inferior parietal lobes and right insular cortex. These distinct connectivity patterns were substantiated by analyses of FC between left- and right-hemispheric ROIs, which revealed that decreased interhemispheric and right intrahemispheric FC was associated with higher levels of impairment. Together, these findings indicate that intrahemispheric and interhemispheric cooperation between brain regions lying outside the damaged area contributes to spatial deficits in a way that depends on the different cognitive components recruited during reading, spatial judgments, and visual exploration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Focal damage to the right cerebral hemisphere may result in a variety of deficits, often affecting the domain of spatial cognition. The neural correlates of these disorders have traditionally been studied with lesion-symptom mapping, but this method fails to capture the network dynamics that underlie cognitive performance. We studied functional connectivity in patients with right-hemisphere stroke and found a pattern of correlations between the left and right temporo-occipital, inferior parietal, and right insular cortex that were distinctively predictive of deficits in reading, spatial judgment, and visual exploration. This finding reveals the importance of interhemispheric interactions and network adaptations for the manifestation of spatial deficits after damage to the right hemisphere.

[1]  R. Ptak,et al.  The neuroanatomy of spatial awareness: a large-scale region-of-interest and voxel-based anatomical study , 2020, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[2]  T. Nef,et al.  Theta burst stimulation in neglect after stroke: functional outcome and response variability origins , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Radek Ptak,et al.  Damage to the right temporoparietal junction, but not lateral prefrontal or insular cortex, amplifies the role of goal-directed attention , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[4]  H. Karnath,et al.  On the validity of lesion-behaviour mapping methods , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Ptak,et al.  The Dorsal Frontoparietal Network: A Core System for Emulated Action , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  C. Hilgetag,et al.  Game theoretical mapping of causal interactions underlying visuo‐spatial attention in the human brain based on stroke lesions , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity in stroke: Approaches and considerations , 2017, bioRxiv.

[8]  R. Ptak,et al.  A neuroanatomical model of space-based and object-centered processing in spatial neglect , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[9]  O. Sporns,et al.  Network neuroscience , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Ptak,et al.  Theta-band functional connectivity in the dorsal fronto-parietal network predicts goal-directed attention , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Nicholas V. Metcalf,et al.  Normalization of network connectivity in hemispatial neglect recovery , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[13]  Zhiyong Zhao,et al.  Decreased Functional Connectivity of Homotopic Brain Regions in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Resting State fMRI Study , 2016, PloS one.

[14]  M. Farah,et al.  Progress and challenges in probing the human brain , 2015, Nature.

[15]  S. Petersen,et al.  Brain Networks and Cognitive Architectures , 2015, Neuron.

[16]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  White matter lesional predictors of chronic visual neglect: a longitudinal study. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  L. Uddin Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Fenna M. Krienen,et al.  Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: Evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. , 2013 .

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Gang Chen,et al.  Functional Network Endophenotypes Unravel the Effects of Apolipoprotein E Epsilon 4 in Middle-Aged Adults , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Identifying the perfusion deficit in acute stroke with resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[25]  Massimo Silvetti,et al.  Damage to white matter pathways in subacute and chronic spatial neglect: a group study and 2 single-case studies with complete virtual "in vivo" tractography dissection. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Neuroanatomical Dissections of Unilateral Visual Neglect Symptoms: ALE Meta-Analysis of Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[28]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization , 2012, NeuroImage.

[29]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Spatial neglect and perseveration in visuomotor exploration. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[30]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Impaired hemodynamic response in the ischemic brain assessed with BOLD fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  Armin Schnider,et al.  Preserved visual language identification despite severe alexia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Focal Brain Lesions to Critical Locations Cause Widespread Disruption of the Modular Organization of the Brain , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Ptak,et al.  The neural correlates of object-centered processing in reading: A lesion study of neglect dyslexia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Céline R. Gillebert,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: The critical role of superior compared to inferior parietal lesions , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Is there a critical lesion site for unilateral spatial neglect? A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Asymmetry of Parietal Interhemispheric Connections in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  T. Shallice,et al.  The Organisation of Mind , 2011, Cortex.

[40]  H. Karnath,et al.  Personal neglect—A disorder of body representation? , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  DTI-MR tractography of white matter damage in stroke patients with neglect , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Neglect dyslexia: a review of the neuropsychological literature , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[44]  H. Critchley,et al.  The neuropsychological impact of insular cortex lesions , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[45]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[46]  S. Kastner,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[48]  Vijay Kannan,et al.  Neural Substrates of Visuospatial Processing in Distinct Reference Frames: Evidence from Unilateral Spatial Neglect , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Modeling the Impact of Lesions in the Human Brain , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect dyslexia: Frequency, association with other hemispatial neglects, and lesion localization , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  Convergence between Lesion-Symptom Mapping and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spatially Selective Attention in the Intact Brain , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  H. Rolf Jäger,et al.  Enantiomorphic normalization of focally lesioned brains , 2008, NeuroImage.

[56]  R. Ptak,et al.  A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[59]  Umberto Sabatini,et al.  Neural bases of personal and extrapersonal neglect in humans. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[60]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Direct Intracranial, fMRI, and Lesion Evidence for the Causal Role of Left Inferotemporal Cortex in Reading , 2006, Neuron.

[61]  H. Karnath,et al.  Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions , 2006, Brain Research.

[62]  Chris Rorden,et al.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  F. Tomaiuolo,et al.  The anatomy of neglect without hemianopia: a key role for parietal–frontal disconnection? , 2003, Neuroreport.

[64]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  J-M Beis,et al.  Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[67]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[68]  P M Matthews,et al.  Altered Hemodynamic Responses in Patients After Subcortical Stroke Measured by Functional MRI , 2002, Stroke.

[69]  C D Frith,et al.  Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[70]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A framework for interpreting distinct patterns of hemispatial neglect , 1995 .

[71]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  "Neglect dyslexia" and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords , 1995 .

[72]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity , 2011 .

[74]  R. Ptak,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Functions , 2008 .

[75]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[76]  P M Rossini,et al.  Does cerebrovascular disease affect the coupling between neuronal activity and local haemodynamics? , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[77]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .