A contingency analysis of post-bureaucratic controls in IT-related change

Recent developments in IT-enabled change have sparked many discussions on the emergence of a new management paradigm beyond bureaucracy. However, many of these studies are anecdotal or descriptive in nature, with few empirical studies. This research attempts to address this problem by developing a contingency framework within which the impact of information technology (IT) implementation on forms of postbureaucratic controls is examined. It identifies post-bureaucratic control as a portfolio comprising empowerment, and panoptic or ideological control and argues that the emergence of these controls will differ, depending on the nature of the task structuredness and the context of IT-enabled change. It argues that the panoptic visibility afforded by the new technology enables management to decentralize power to employees without completely losing control. However, the ability to textualize behaviors in unstructured tasks is limited. In compensation, management will use ideological control to ensure that organization goals are met. Using a mixed methodology of qualitative and quantitative methods, two organizations, one undergoing an automational change and another a transformational change, were selected as cases to illustrate the framework. This study should prove interesting to researchers as it undertakes an empirical examination of post-bureaucratic controls and proposes a contingency framework to tie up apparent contradictions in findings. It also identifies new forms of control beyond bureaucracy, which practitioners may find are becoming increasingly relevant in a more fluid, uncertain “new economy.”

[1]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[2]  Francis A. Wilson,et al.  Managerial control strategies within the networked organization , 1995, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[4]  Norval F. Pohl Using Retrospective Pre-Ratings to Counteract Response-Shift Confounding , 1982 .

[5]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Consistency of job satisfaction across situations: Fact or framing artifact? , 1992 .

[6]  Marvin E. Rozen,et al.  Beyond Mechanization: Work and Technology in a Postindustrial Age , 1985 .

[7]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Information technology and the control function of supervision , 1988 .

[8]  Larry Hirschhorn,et al.  Beyond mechanization: Work and technology in a postindustrial age , 1984 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[10]  Johan Hoogstraten,et al.  Pretesting effects in retrospective pretest posttest designs. , 1989 .

[11]  Kylie Sayer,et al.  Empowerment in business process reengineering: an ethnographic study of implementation discourses , 1997, ICIS '97.

[12]  J. Child New technology and developments in management organization , 1984 .

[13]  E. Lawler,et al.  The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[14]  J. Cash,et al.  Information Technology and Tomorrow's Manager , 1988 .

[15]  Barbara Czarniawska Ideological control in nonideological organizations , 1988 .

[16]  G. Susman,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organization Structure: Empowerment or Subordination? , 1992 .

[17]  W. Ouchi A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[18]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[19]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Middle Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[20]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[21]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee-Organization Linakges: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover , 1985 .

[22]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Coming of the New Organization , 2001 .

[23]  C. Dandeker Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day , 1990 .

[24]  N. Carter Computerization as a Predominate Technology: Its Influence on the Structure of Newspaper Organizations , 1984 .

[25]  R. Walton,et al.  From Control to Commitment in the Workplace: In Factory after Factory, There Is a Revolution Under Way in the Management of Work. Readings on Labor-Management Relations. , 1991 .

[26]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[27]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[28]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[29]  R. D'amico Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[30]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[31]  W. Ouchi The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control. , 1977 .

[32]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Computer information systems and organization structure , 1981, CACM.

[33]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Casemix Management in a New Zealand Hospital: Rationalisation and Resistance , 1999 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[35]  G. Sewell,et al.  `Someone to Watch Over Me': Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process , 1992 .

[36]  Lawrence W. Foster,et al.  Management Information Technology: Its Effects on Orgnizational Form and Function , 1984, MIS Q..

[37]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model , 1984 .

[38]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[39]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[40]  Amin Rajan,et al.  In the age of the smart machine , 1990 .

[41]  Richard Edwards,et al.  The Social Relations of Production At the Point of Production , 1978 .

[42]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[43]  G. Huber The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[44]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[45]  G. Sewell The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .

[46]  R Pascale,et al.  Changing the way we change. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[47]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[48]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .