Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymmetry and accountability

[1]  C. Sedikides,et al.  Reputational Implications of Procedural Fairness for Personal and Relational Self-Esteem , 2008 .

[2]  D. De Cremer,et al.  Justifying Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Justification Pressures and Tacit Coordination Under Environmental Uncertainty , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Audience effects on moralistic punishment , 2007 .

[4]  D. Cremer,et al.  Self-Benefiting in the Allocation of Scarce Resources: Leader-Follower Effects and the Moderating Effect of Social Value Orientations , 2006 .

[5]  M. van vugt,et al.  Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  M. Bateson,et al.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting , 2006, Biology Letters.

[7]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment , 2006 .

[8]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Social animals and economic beings : On unifying social psychology and economics , 2006 .

[9]  H. Wilke,et al.  Undermining trust and cooperation : The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas , 2006 .

[10]  Michael E. Price,et al.  Monitoring, reputation, and ‘greenbeard’ reciprocity in a Shuar work team , 2006 .

[11]  D. Cremer,et al.  When self-interest and fairness go hand in hand and when they go their own way , 2006 .

[12]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. , 2005 .

[13]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Pat Barclay Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the ''tragedy of the commons'' , 2004 .

[15]  D. Moore,et al.  When Ignorance Is Bliss: Information Exchange and Inefficiency in Bargaining , 2004, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[16]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Third Party Punishment and Social Norms , 2004 .

[17]  David De Cremer,et al.  How Self-Conception May Lead to Inequality Effect of Hierarchical Roles on the Equality Rule in Organizational Resource-Sharing Tasks , 2003 .

[18]  D. Cremer,et al.  Accountability and cooperation in social dilemmas: The influence of others’ reputational concerns , 2003 .

[19]  M. E. Price Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village , 2003, Human nature.

[20]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Social Identity and Leadership Processes in Groups , 2003 .

[21]  D. Cremer,et al.  Perceived Criticality and Contributions in Public Good Dilemmas: A Matter of Feeling Responsible to all? , 2002 .

[22]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: the search for mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  David De Cremer,et al.  Intergroup and Intragroup Aspects of Leadership in Social Dilemmas: A Relational Model of Cooperation , 2002 .

[24]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[25]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[26]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity , 2001 .

[27]  Mark Snyder,et al.  "The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?": The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas , 2001 .

[28]  Henk A. M. Wilke,et al.  Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  D. Messick,et al.  Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[30]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[31]  David De Cremer,et al.  Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods , 1999 .

[32]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  What Information Do We Use in Social Dilemmas? Environmental Uncertainty and the Employment of Coordination Rules , 1999 .

[33]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Experimental Economics From the Vantage‐point of Behavioural Economics , 1999 .

[35]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Anonymity and social control in social dilemmas. , 1999 .

[36]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. , 1999 .

[37]  Michael Smithson,et al.  Resolving Social Dilemmas : Dynamic, Structural, and Intergroup Aspects , 1999 .

[38]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[39]  K. Sigmund,et al.  Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity , 1998 .

[40]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases , 1997 .

[41]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness in Asymmetric, Environmental Social Dilemmas: Explaining Harvesting Behavior and the Role of Communication , 1996 .

[42]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Framing in Resource Dilemmas: Loss Aversion and the Moderating Effects of Sanctions , 1995 .

[43]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: a comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas , 1995 .

[44]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  Assymetry of wealth and public good provision , 1994 .

[45]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step good , 1992 .

[46]  N. Kerr Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. , 1992 .

[47]  Lawrence J. Sanna,et al.  Self-efficacy theory : implications for social facilitation and social loafing , 1992 .

[48]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle , 1991 .

[49]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan , 1988 .

[50]  Sharone L. Maital Applied Behavioral Economics , 1988 .

[51]  D. Organ Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[52]  A. Rapoport Provision of step-level public goods: effects of inequality in resources , 1988 .

[53]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Seriousness of Social Dilemmas and the Provision of a Sanctioning System , 1988 .

[54]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[55]  T. Yamagishi The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[56]  John Orbell,et al.  The Minimal Contributing Set as a Solution to Public Goods Problems , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[57]  David M. Messick,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ADAPTATIONS AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGE AS SOLUTIONS TO SOCIAL DILEMMAS , 1983 .

[58]  David M. Messick,et al.  Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives , 1983 .

[59]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[60]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Face-Saving and Entrapment , 1981 .

[61]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Alternative approaches to deindividuation. , 1977, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  M. D. Caldwell,et al.  Communication and sex effects in a five-person Prisoner's Dilemma Game. , 1976 .

[63]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[64]  Jerome M. Chertkoff,et al.  A bargaining theory of coalition formation. , 1973 .

[65]  D. C. Glass,et al.  Evaluation apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[67]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.