An approach to robust decision making under severe uncertainty in life cycle design

Information-Gap Decision Theory (IGDT), an approach to robust decision making under severe uncertainty, is newly considered in the context of environmental performance affected by life cycle uncertainty. An IGDT decision strategy favours the design(s) that can endure the most estimation error while still guaranteeing no worse than some 'good enough' critical level of performance. In this paper, a simple automotive oil filter design selection example with severe uncertainty is formulated and solved using an IGDT approach. Implications of IGDT to life cycle engineering design problems are discussed, as are potential limitations that could be encountered when solving more complex problems.

[1]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics , 1990 .

[2]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Evidence Theory for Engineering Applications , 2004 .

[3]  Yakov Ben-Haim,et al.  Uncertainty, probability and information-gaps , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Y. Ben-Haim Info-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty , 2006 .

[5]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundation of Statistics , 1956 .

[6]  M. Huijbregts Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment , 2002 .

[7]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[8]  Bert Bras,et al.  A DECISION SUPPORT MODEL FOR THE LIFE-CYCLE DESIGN OF A FAMILY OF OIL FILTERS , 1999 .

[9]  P. Hofstetter Perspective in life cycle impact assessment: A structured approach to combine of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere , 2000 .

[10]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  ROBUST DECISION‐MAKING UNDER SEVERE UNCERTAINTY FOR CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[11]  Lesley F. Wright,et al.  Information Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty , 2004 .

[12]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Decision making in an uncertain world: information-gap modeling in water resources management , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[13]  C. Dujet,et al.  Possibility Theory: A New Approach to Uncertainty Analysis? (3 pp) , 2006 .

[14]  K. Vind A foundation for statistics , 2003 .

[15]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  Types of Uncertainty in Design Decision Making , 2004 .

[16]  Chris Paredis,et al.  Applying Information-Gap Decision Theory to a Design Problem having Severe Uncertainty , 2006 .

[17]  David Evans,et al.  How LCA studies deal with uncertainty , 2002 .

[18]  Yakov Ben-Haim,et al.  Robust rationality and decisions under severe uncertainty , 2000, J. Frankl. Inst..

[19]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Info-gap robustness for the correlation of tests and simulations of a non-linear transient , 2004 .

[20]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Info-gap robust design with load and model uncertainties , 2005 .

[21]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Convex Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Uncertainties and Info-Gap Flood Management Decisions , 2005 .

[22]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[23]  Y. Ben-Haim Set-models of information-gap uncertainty: axioms and an inference scheme , 1999 .

[24]  C. Paredis,et al.  The Value of Using Imprecise Probabilities in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[25]  Y. Ben-Haim Information-gap decision theory : decisions under severe uncertainty , 2001 .

[26]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Part I: A General Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Life Cycle Assessment , 1998 .