The importance and implementation of accurate 3D compensation methods for quantitative SPECT.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of 2D versus 3D compensation methods in SPECT. The compensation methods included in the study addressed two important degrading factors, namely attenuating and collimator-detector response in SPET. They can be divided into two general categories. The conventional methods are based on the filtered backprojection algorithm, the Chang algorithm for attenuation compensation and the Metz filter for detector response compensation. These methods, which were computationally efficient, could only achieve approximate compensation due to the assumptions made. The quantitative compensation methods provide accurate compensation by modelling the degrading effects at the expense of large computational requirements. Both types of compensation methods were implemented in 2D and 3D reconstructions. The 2D and 3D reconstruction/compensation methods were evaluated using data from simulation of brain and heart, and patient thallium SPECT studies. Our results demonstrate the importance of compensation methods in improving the quality and quantitative accuracy of SPECT images and the relative effectiveness of the different 2D and 3D reconstruction/compensation methods. We concluded that 3D implementation of the quantitative compensation methods provides the best SPECT image in terms of quantitative accuracy, spatial resolution, and noise at a cost of high computational requirements.

[1]  E.C. Frey,et al.  Reconstruction methods for quantitative brain SPECT , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[2]  C E Metz,et al.  The geometric transfer function component for scintillation camera collimators with straight parallel holes. , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  G T Gullberg,et al.  SPECT liver imaging using an iterative attenuation correction algorithm and an external flood source. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  D R Gilland,et al.  Determination of the optimum filter function for SPECT imaging. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  N. Pelc,et al.  An attenuated projector-backprojector for iterative SPECT reconstruction. , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  T. Turkington,et al.  Simultaneous compensation for attenuation, scatter and detector response for SPECT reconstruction in three dimensions. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Benjamin M. W. Tsui,et al.  Simulation evaluation of Gibbs prior distributions for use in maximum a posteriori SPECT reconstructions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  Benjamin M. W. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of filtered-backprojection and ML-EM reconstructed emission tomographic images , 1992 .

[11]  Z. Liang,et al.  Quantitative SPECT brain imaging: effects of attenuation and detector responseat , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[12]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  E. Frey,et al.  A practical method for incorporating scatter in a projector-backprojector for accurate scatter compensation in SPECT , 1993 .

[14]  S. Strother,et al.  Practical tradeoffs between noise, quantitation, and number of iterations for maximum likelihood-based reconstructions. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[15]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Lee-Tzuu Chang,et al.  Attenuation Correction and Incomplete Projection in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The Use of Sieves to Stabilize Images Produced with the EM Algorithm for Emission Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Analysis of SPECT including Scatter and Attenuation Using Sophisticated Monte Carlo Modeling Methods , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  Eiichi Tanaka.  A Fast Reconstruction Algorthm for Stationary Positron Emission Tomography Based on a Modified EM Algorithm , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  B. C. Penney,et al.  Two-dimensional filtering of SPECT images using the Metz and Wiener filters. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  G.T. Gullberg,et al.  Frequency domain implementation of the three-dimensional geometric point response correction in SPECT imaging , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[22]  M I Miller,et al.  Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography incorporating Good's roughness prior on massively parallel processors. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction for Positron Emission Tomography Based on the EM Algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  On The Acceleration Of Maximum Likelihood Algorithms , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[25]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Implementing and Accelerating the EM Algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  J. Terry,et al.  Three-dimensional iterative reconstruction algorithms with attenuation and geometric point response correction , 1990 .

[27]  R B Schwinger,et al.  Variation of the count-dependent Metz filter with imaging system modulation transfer function. , 1986, Medical physics.

[28]  J. L. Coffey,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions for photon sources uniformly distributed in the heart chambers and heart wall of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1981, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Inverse Monte Carlo: A Unified Reconstruction Algorithm for SPECT , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[30]  G T Gullberg,et al.  The geometric transfer function for cone and fan beam collimators. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  D. Gilland,et al.  Implementation of simultaneous attenuation and detector response correction in SPECT , 1988 .

[32]  Lee-Tzuu Chang,et al.  A Method for Attenuation Correction in Radionuclide Computed Tomography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[33]  J R Perry,et al.  Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imaging. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Improving the efficiency of emission tomography simulations using variance reduction techniques , 1990 .

[35]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Physical Factors Affecting Quantitative Measurements Using Camera-Based Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (Spect) , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[36]  M I Miller,et al.  Maximum likelihood SPECT in clinical computation times using mesh-connected parallel computers. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[37]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Parameterization of the scatter response function in SPECT imaging using Monte Carlo simulation , 1990 .

[39]  E. Hoffman,et al.  3-D phantom to simulate cerebral blood flow and metabolic images for PET , 1990 .

[40]  C E Floyd,et al.  Energy and spatial distribution of multiple order Compton scatter in SPECT: a Monte Carlo investigation. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Comparison between ML-EM and WLS-CG algorithms for SPECT image reconstruction , 1991 .

[42]  A. Formiconi,et al.  Compensation of spatial system response in SPECT with conjugate gradient reconstruction technique. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  M. Ljungberg,et al.  A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. , 1989, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[44]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  Charles E. Metz,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION OF RADIOISOTOPE SCAN IMAGE PROCESSING , 1969 .

[46]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  A fast projector-backprojector pair modeling the asymmetric, spatially varying scatter response function for scatter compensation in SPECT imaging , 1993 .