Opportunities for Low-Grade Coals and Biomass for Producing Hydrogen Using Iron Oxide-Based Direct Chemical Looping Combustion with Effective CO2 Separation

Coal and biomass are abundant in supply but contain carbon which, to avoid greenhouse gas emissions, needs to be sequestered after the primary energy conversion. A comparison is reported here of the performance of four different coals and biomass in an iron oxide-based direct chemical looping combustion system. The principal aim is to identify the coal and biomass with the highest H2 to CO2 ratio for a given amount of fuel, based on the resources (air and iron oxide) used. The impact of fuel blend (mix of coal and biomass) on hydrogen production is compared, and the effect of moisture content of the source fuel on hydrogen production is investigated. Simulation results suggest that low-grade coal can also produce the same amount of hydrogen as high grade coal, but with additional energy requirements. In achieving maxi- mum hydrogen production, the final 20 to 30% of hydrogen production consumes the same amount of energy required by the initial 70% of production. When biomass is blended with 20% coal by mass, 10% additional hydrogen is produced. A 10% moisture content in the source fuel reduces the hydrogen production by 10% for high-grade coal while it eliminates the possibility for low-grade biomass to produce hydrogen within the available energy region. Potential improvements of the energy requirement to achieve maximum hydrogen production from low-grade solid fuels are also reported.

[1]  R. J. Copeland,et al.  Analysis of the sorbent energy transfer system (SETS) for power generation and CO2 capture , 2003 .

[2]  L. Øi Aspen HYSYS Simulation of CO2 Removal by Amine Absorption from a Gas Based Power Plant , 2007 .

[3]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes , 2008 .

[4]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  Thermal Analysis of Chemical-Looping Combustion , 2006 .

[5]  S. Channiwala,et al.  A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels , 2005 .

[6]  George Skodras,et al.  Energy and capital cost analysis of CO2 capture in coal IGCC processes via gas separation membranes , 2004 .

[7]  Hongguang Jin,et al.  A new type of coal gas fueled chemical-looping combustion , 2004 .

[8]  T. Muneer,et al.  Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies , 2007 .

[9]  A. Abad,et al.  Temperature variations in the oxygen carrier particles during their reduction and oxidation in a chemical-looping combustion system , 2005 .

[10]  Anders Lyngfelt,et al.  Using steam reforming to produce hydrogen with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion , 2006 .

[11]  Franz Winter,et al.  Iron Ore Reduction in a Laboratory-scale Fluidized Bed Reactor-Effect of Pre-reduction on Final Reduction Degree , 2005 .

[12]  Hongguang Jin,et al.  Reactivity study on a novel hydrogen fueled chemical-looping combustion , 2001 .

[13]  Nicholas Cheremisinoff,et al.  Gasification Technologies: A Primer for Engineers and Scientists , 2005 .

[14]  Nicole Jestin-Fleury,et al.  International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook. 1994 Edition , 1994 .

[15]  Anne-Gaëlle Collot,et al.  Matching gasification technologies to coal properties , 2006 .

[16]  C. Müller,et al.  Clean hydrogen production and electricity from coal via chemical looping: Identifying a suitable operating regime , 2009 .

[17]  T. Pipoli Sponge Iron Process for Manned Space Exploration , 2005 .

[18]  J. Grace,et al.  Equilibrium modeling of gasification: a free energy minimization approach and its application to a circulating fluidized bed coal gasifier , 2001 .

[19]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  Combustion of Syngas and Natural Gas in a 300 W Chemical-Looping Combustor , 2006 .

[20]  Judith Gurney BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[21]  Anders Lyngfelt,et al.  Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels , 2009 .

[22]  M. Rosen,et al.  Hydrogen production from coal using coal direct chemical looping and syngas chemical looping combustion systems: Assessment of system operation and resource requirements , 2009 .

[23]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Hydrogen production from coal gasification for effective downstream CO2 capture , 2010 .

[24]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Syngas Redox (SGR) Process to Produce Hydrogen from Coal Derived Syngas , 2007 .