Interfacing Conducting Polymer Nanotubes with the Central Nervous System: Chronic Neural Recording using Poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) Nanotubes

Development of advanced chronic, high-fidelity neural interfaces is accelerating research into brain function[1] and more effective treatments for neurological conditions.[2–5] The primary functional requirements of these interfaces include recording and/or stimulating from a number of discretely sampled volumes of the brain at requisite spatial resolutions for specific time periods that may extend from hours to years.[6–9] This translates to a push towards smaller electrodes that are more biologically transparent and biocompatible[10–12] with a high density of electrode sites that remain functional for long period of time.[13–15] As electrode size goes to the microscale (higher spatial selectivity), the impedance of electrode site increases, and consequently, the quality of signal recordings decreases (lower sensitivity). Thus, there is a trade off between the size (spatial selectivity) and quality of signal recordings (sensitivity) in neural microelectrodes.[16–18] Studies have also shown that the response of brain tissue to implanted microelectrodes includes an acute injury and a chronic reactive tissue response. The chronic response is characterized by the presence of both activated microglia and reactive astrocytes, which eventually encapsulate the electrode to some degree.[10,12,19–21] Consequently, in addition to the initial high impedance of microelectrodes, these reactive tissue responses have been associated with a progressive increase in the impedance of the electrode/tissue interface.[10,12] Therefore, achieving a very low impedance electrode/tissue interface is important for maintaining and improving signal quality.

[1]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Actions from thoughts , 2001, Nature.

[2]  Peter Brown,et al.  Oscillatory Local Field Potentials Recorded from the Subthalamic Nucleus of the Alert Rat , 2002, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  A. Heeger,et al.  Semiconducting and Metallic Polymers: The Fourth Generation of Polymeric Materials , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[4]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Joseph J Pancrazio,et al.  Neural interfaces at the nanoscale. , 2008, Nanomedicine.

[6]  Christine E. Schmidt,et al.  Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering , 2007 .

[7]  K. Horch,et al.  Biocompatibility of silicon-based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  S. Cogan Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[9]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Advanced Neurotechnologies for Chronic Neural Interfaces: New Horizons and Clinical Opportunities , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Review of signal distortion through metal microelectrode recording circuits and filters , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  W. Grill,et al.  Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  David C. Martin,et al.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[15]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[16]  E. Smela Conjugated Polymer Actuators for Biomedical Applications , 2003 .

[17]  Gengfeng Zheng,et al.  Detection, Stimulation, and Inhibition of Neuronal Signals with High-Density Nanowire Transistor Arrays , 2006, Science.

[18]  D. Edell,et al.  Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  M. Abidian,et al.  Conducting‐Polymer Nanotubes for Controlled Drug Release , 2006, Advanced materials.

[20]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[21]  G. Whitesides The 'right' size in nanobiotechnology , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  M. Berggren,et al.  Electronic control of Ca2+ signalling in neuronal cells using an organic electronic ion pump. , 2007, Nature materials.

[23]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  David C. Martin,et al.  Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Thomas M. McKenna,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Cultured Neural Networks , 1994 .

[26]  R Langer,et al.  Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[29]  G. Wallace,et al.  Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[30]  Eva Syková,et al.  Diffusion barriers evoked in the rat cortex by reactive astrogliosis , 1999, Glia.

[31]  D. Robinson,et al.  The electrical properties of metal microelectrodes , 1968 .

[32]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[33]  R. J. Vetter,et al.  Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  Paul M. George,et al.  Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[35]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) and Its Derivatives: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[36]  D. Kipke,et al.  Neural probe design for reduced tissue encapsulation in CNS. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[37]  David C. Martin,et al.  Electrochemical deposition and characterization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on neural microelectrode arrays , 2003 .

[38]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  G. Buzsáki Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Kip A Ludwig,et al.  Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  M. Prato,et al.  Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. , 2005, Nano letters.