A machine learning methodology for multivariate pore-pressure prediction

Abstract Accurate pore-pressure prediction is of essential importance to hydrocarbon exploration and development. A multivariate prediction model of multiple petrophysical data is required to adequately reflect variations in pore pressure. However, the parametric multivariate models with assumptions on lithology, predominantly sand or shale, are theoretically inaccurate for mixed lithologies and require a tedious calibration process. Here, we propose a new method of utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques for pore-pressure prediction with a nonparametric multivariate model of petrophysical properties (sonic velocity, porosity, and shale volume). The training dataset for the ML models is constructed using petrophysical properties extracted from well log data and theoretical effective stress in the normally compacted interval. Bowers’ unloading relation is invoked herein to account for abnormal pressure generated by unloading. Four ML algorithms, including the multilayer perceptron neural network, support vector machine, random forest, and gradient boosting machine, are applied to well log data from a set of offshore exploration wells in the East China Sea Shelf Basin. The results suggest that the proposed method using ML makes pore-pressure predictions in good agreement with pore-pressure measurement, and random forest outperforms the other ML algorithms in terms of goodness-of-fit, generalizability, and prediction accuracy. Compared with methods based on parametric models, the proposed method based on ML produces more accurate pore-pressure prediction and better capture the onset of overpressure.

[1]  R. Hillis,et al.  Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei , 2009 .

[2]  San-zhong Li,et al.  Numerical modeling of Late Miocene tectonic inversion in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin, China , 2014 .

[3]  Swapan Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparison of four approaches to a rock facies classification problem , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  I. D. Gates,et al.  On the Capability of Support Vector Machines to Classify Lithology from Well Logs , 2010 .

[5]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[6]  Ursula Iturrarán-Viveros,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks applied to estimate permeability, porosity and intrinsic attenuation using seismic attributes and well-log data , 2014 .

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[8]  A. Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi,et al.  Pore pressure prediction and modeling using well-logging data in one of the gas fields in south of Iran , 2015 .

[9]  Wen Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of machine learning methods for formation lithology identification: A comparison of tuning processes and model performances , 2018 .

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[11]  C. Sayers,et al.  Predrill pore-pressure prediction using seismic data , 2001 .

[12]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[13]  D. Dewhurst,et al.  Model-based pore-pressure prediction in shales: An example from the Gulf of Mexico, North America , 2017 .

[14]  R. Ewy,et al.  Effective Stress Laws For Petrophysical Rock Properties , 2008 .

[15]  H. Stollhofen,et al.  Disequilibrium compaction overpressure in shales of the Bavarian Foreland Molasse Basin: Results and geographical distribution from velocity-based analyses , 2018 .

[16]  Yanghua Wang,et al.  Porosity prediction using the group method of data handling , 2011 .

[17]  D. Lai,et al.  Integrated TOC prediction and source rock characterization using machine learning, well logs and geochemical analysis: Case study from the Jurassic source rocks in Shams Field, NW Desert, Egypt , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[18]  A. Muggeridge,et al.  Hydrodynamic aquifer or reservoir compartmentalization , 2012 .

[19]  N. Goulty Mechanical compaction behaviour of natural clays and implications for pore pressure estimation , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[20]  G. Bowers Detecting high overpressure , 2002 .

[21]  Amir Hossein Alavi,et al.  Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing , 2016 .

[22]  Rashmi Dutta Baruah,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in the domain of reservoir characterization: A review from shallow to deep models , 2020, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  Keyu Liu,et al.  Quantitative estimation of overpressure caused by oil generation in petroliferous basins , 2011 .

[24]  Jincai Zhang,et al.  Effective stress, porosity, velocity and abnormal pore pressure prediction accounting for compaction disequilibrium and unloading , 2013 .

[25]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.

[26]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[27]  M. Gutierrez,et al.  Calibration and ranking of pore-pressure prediction models , 2006 .

[28]  André Stumpf,et al.  Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests , 2011 .

[29]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A Short Introduction to Boosting , 1999 .

[30]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  Reservoir Geomechanics: Index , 2007 .

[31]  Saba Keynejad,et al.  Assessment of machine-learning techniques in predicting lithofluid facies logs in hydrocarbon wells , 2019, Interpretation.

[32]  Arman Melkumyan,et al.  Automated recognition of stratigraphic marker shales from geophysical logs in iron ore deposits , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[33]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[34]  Jincai Zhang,et al.  Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approaches , 2011 .

[35]  Mary M. Poulton,et al.  Neural networks as an intelligence amplification tool: A review of applications , 2002 .

[36]  Joel R. Alnes,et al.  Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins; a reevaluation; discussion and reply , 1998 .

[37]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[38]  Vincenzo Lipari,et al.  A machine learning approach to facies classification using well logs , 2017 .

[39]  Colin M. Sayers,et al.  Geophysics Under Stress: Geomechanical Applications of Seismic and Borehole Acoustic Waves , 2010 .

[40]  H. Qing,et al.  Petroleum systems in the offshore Xihu Basin on the continental shelf of the East China Sea , 2007 .

[41]  Gang Liu,et al.  Application of extreme learning machine and neural networks in total organic carbon content prediction in organic shale with wire line logs , 2016 .

[42]  Matthew J. Cracknell,et al.  Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[43]  C. Sayers,et al.  Use of reflection tomography to predict pore pressure in overpressured reservoir sands , 2003 .

[44]  G. Garven,et al.  Hydrodynamics and overpressure mechanisms in the Sacramento basin, California , 1999 .

[45]  I. D. Gates,et al.  Support vector regression for porosity prediction in a heterogeneous reservoir: A comparative study , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[46]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[47]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[48]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[49]  C. Morley,et al.  Reducing the variation of Eaton’s exponent for overpressure prediction in a basin affected by multiple overpressure mechanisms , 2014 .

[50]  M. Zoback,et al.  Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity, and clay content in sandstone , 1989 .

[51]  Glenn L. Bowers,et al.  Pore Pressure Estimation From Velocity Data: Accounting for Overpressure Mechanisms Besides Undercompaction , 1995 .

[52]  L. Vernik Seismic Petrophysics in Quantitative Interpretation , 2016 .

[53]  Toby Darling,et al.  Well Logging and Formation Evaluation , 2005 .

[54]  Marcelo Kehl de Souza,et al.  Evaluation of machine learning methods for lithology classification using geophysical data , 2020, Comput. Geosci..

[55]  R. Swarbrick Challenges of Porosity Based Pore Pressure Prediction , 2001 .

[56]  D. Ghosh,et al.  Overpressure in the Malay Basin and prediction methods , 2016 .

[57]  G. H. F. Gardner,et al.  FORMATION VELOCITY AND DENSITY—THE DIAGNOSTIC BASICS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS , 1974 .

[58]  Tobias Malte Müller,et al.  Biot coefficient is distinct from effective pressure coefficient , 2016 .

[59]  Ben A. Eaton,et al.  The Equation for Geopressure Prediction from Well Logs , 1975 .

[60]  D. Basak,et al.  Support Vector Regression , 2008 .

[61]  D. Yale,et al.  Novel Pore Pressure Prediction Technique for Unconventional Reservoirs , 2018 .

[62]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms , 2012 .

[63]  G. Karthikeyan,et al.  An integrated pore-pressure model and its application to hydrocarbon exploration: A case study from the Mahanadi Basin, east coast of India , 2014 .

[64]  Jun Li,et al.  Advances in the origin of overpressures in sedimentary basins , 2018 .