What makes basketball players continue with the planned play or change it? A case study of the relationships between sense-making and decision-making

Abstract In team sports, players are required to undertake planned coordination (i.e., play) so that their teammates know what will happen and can achieve positive outcomes. They are also required to change the play when situations develop in a different way to that anticipated. But what make the players continue with the planned play or change it? This study aimed to identify relationships between the sense players made of situations and their decisions to continue with the planned play or change it. Seven female elite basketball players from the same team participated in the study. A match was video-recorded. Postperformance interviews were conducted separately; each player was shown the video and asked to describe her activity in relation to the events observed. The interview data were used to identify how players made sense of situations and the relationships between sense-making and decision-making. Results showed two steps in sense-making: assessment of the current situation, and anticipation of possible situation developments to manage risk. Results also showed risk assessment led the players to continue or change the play. Results suggest players used situation recognition and mental simulation to make sense of situations. They changed the play to cope with risks, suggesting team adaptation.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity , 2005 .

[2]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[3]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[4]  David W. Eccles,et al.  What makes an orienteer an expert? A case study of a highly elite orienteer's concerns in the course of competition , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  Sterling Wiggins,et al.  Team sensemaking , 2010 .

[6]  K. Anders Ericsson,et al.  Uncovering the structure of a memorist’s superior “basic” memory capacity , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  The effects of non-specific and specific concepts on tactical creativity in team ball sports , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[8]  U. Neisser.  Cognitive Psychology. (Book Reviews: Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology) , 1976 .

[9]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Back to SA school: contrasting three approaches to situation awareness in the cockpit , 2011 .

[10]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[11]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  G. Goodwin,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: The Making of a Dream Team: When Expert Teams Do Best , 2006 .

[13]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[15]  Phil Turner,et al.  Describing Team Work with Activity Theory , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[16]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Performance related experiences and coping during races: A case of an elite sailor , 2008 .

[17]  Gary Klein,et al.  Streetlights and Shadows: Searching for the Keys to Adaptive Decision Making , 2009 .

[18]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[19]  Jennifer K. Phillips,et al.  A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking , 2007 .

[20]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Wolves, bees, and football: Enhancing coordination in sociotechnological problem solving systems through the study of human and animal groups , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  David W. Eccles,et al.  Getting Them on the Same Page: Strategies for Enhancing Coordination and Communication in Sports Teams , 2012 .

[22]  David W. Eccles,et al.  Competition-specific preparation and expert performance. , 2009 .

[23]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[24]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[25]  A. Macquet,et al.  Naturalistic decision-making in expert badminton players , 2007, Ergonomics.

[26]  Gary Klein,et al.  Rapid Decision Making on the Fire Ground , 1986 .

[27]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Anne-Claire Macquet,et al.  Recognition Within the Decision-Making Process: A Case Study of Expert Volleyball Players , 2009 .

[29]  David W. Eccles.  The coordination of labour in sports teams , 2010 .

[30]  Daniel K. Johnson.  Letting the social and cognitive merge: New concepts for an understanding of group functioning in sport , 2008 .

[31]  Getting Them on the Same Page: A Method to Study the Consistency of Coaches' and Athletes' Situation Understanding During Training Sessions and Competitions , 2013 .

[32]  C. Sève,et al.  Team Coordination in Basketball: Description of the Cognitive Connections Among Teammates , 2010 .

[33]  U. Neisser.  Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[34]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[35]  N. Cooke,et al.  From battle plans to football plays: Extending military team cognition to football , 2006 .

[36]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[37]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[38]  R. J. B..  The Child's Conception of the World , 1929, Nature.

[39]  K. Weick.  ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1] , 1988 .