A feature–based model of symmetry detection

Symmetry detection is important for many biological visual systems, including those of mammals, insects and birds. We constructed a symmetry–detection algorithm with two stages: location of the visually salient features of the image, then evaluating the symmetry of these features over a long range, by means of a simple Gaussian filter. The algorithm detects the axis of maximum symmetry for human faces (or any arbitrary image) and calculates the magnitude of the asymmetry. We have evaluated the algorithm on the dataset of Rhodeset al. (1998Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 5, 659–669) and found that the algorithm is able to discriminate small variations of symmetry created by computer–manipulating the symmetry levels in individual faces, and that the values measured by the algorithm correlate well with human psycho–physical symmetry ratings.

[1]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[2]  B Julesz,et al.  Binocular Disappearance of Monocular Symmetry , 1966, Science.

[3]  I. Rock The Logic of Perception , 1983 .

[4]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[5]  Robyn A. Owens,et al.  Feature detection from local energy , 1987, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  The conditions under which Mach bands are visible , 1989, Vision Research.

[8]  M. Morrone,et al.  Vision: Feature detection in biological and artificial visual systems , 1990 .

[9]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[10]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches , 1994, Nature.

[11]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetric chest plumage , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Behavior , 1994 .

[13]  R. Watt,et al.  Detection of bilateral symmetry using spatial filters. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[14]  T. Poggio,et al.  The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition , 1994, Current Biology.

[15]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Jon Driver,et al.  Obligatory edge-assignment in vision: The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection. , 1995 .

[17]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Gaze detection and the cortical processing of faces: Evidence from infants and adults , 1995 .

[18]  C. Tyler,et al.  Multiple mechanisms for the detection of mirror symmetry. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[19]  A. Møller,et al.  Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns , 1995 .

[21]  R. Kowner,et al.  Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Daniel Osorio,et al.  Symmetry detection by categorization of spatial phase, a model , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Medial-point description of shape: a representation for action coding and its psychophysical correlates , 1998, Vision Research.

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[27]  D. Mumford,et al.  The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  A. Møller,et al.  Asymmetry, Developmental Stability, and Evolution , 1998 .

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are Average Facial Configurations Attractive Only Because of Their Symmetry? , 1999 .

[30]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[32]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[34]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Yuji Moro,et al.  Facial Asymmetry and Attractiveness Judgment in Developmental Perspective , 2001 .

[36]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives , 2001 .

[38]  C. Tyler Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[39]  Mark W Pettet,et al.  Temporal dynamics of the human response to symmetry. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[40]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. , 2002 .