Source-Modeling Auditory Processes of EEG Data Using EEGLAB and Brainstorm

Electroencephalography (EEG) source localization approaches are often used to disentangle the spatial patterns mixed up in scalp EEG recordings. However, approaches differ substantially between experiments, may be strongly parameter-dependent, and results are not necessarily meaningful. In this paper we provide a pipeline for EEG source estimation, from raw EEG data pre-processing using EEGLAB functions up to source-level analysis as implemented in Brainstorm. The pipeline is tested using a data set of 10 individuals performing an auditory attention task. The analysis approach estimates sources of 64-channel EEG data without the prerequisite of individual anatomies or individually digitized sensor positions. First, we show advanced EEG pre-processing using EEGLAB, which includes artifact attenuation using independent component analysis (ICA). ICA is a linear decomposition technique that aims to reveal the underlying statistical sources of mixed signals and is further a powerful tool to attenuate stereotypical artifacts (e.g., eye movements or heartbeat). Data submitted to ICA are pre-processed to facilitate good-quality decompositions. Aiming toward an objective approach on component identification, the semi-automatic CORRMAP algorithm is applied for the identification of components representing prominent and stereotypic artifacts. Second, we present a step-wise approach to estimate active sources of auditory cortex event-related processing, on a single subject level. The presented approach assumes that no individual anatomy is available and therefore the default anatomy ICBM152, as implemented in Brainstorm, is used for all individuals. Individual noise modeling in this dataset is based on the pre-stimulus baseline period. For EEG source modeling we use the OpenMEEG algorithm as the underlying forward model based on the symmetric Boundary Element Method (BEM). We then apply the method of dynamical statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) to obtain physiologically plausible EEG source estimates. Finally, we show how to perform group level analysis in the time domain on anatomically defined regions of interest (auditory scout). The proposed pipeline needs to be tailored to the specific datasets and paradigms. However, the straightforward combination of EEGLAB and Brainstorm analysis tools may be of interest to others performing EEG source localization.

[1]  S. Debener,et al.  Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Debener,et al.  Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[4]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Differences Between MEG and High-Density EEG Source Localizations Using a Distributed Source Model in Comparison to fMRI , 2014, Brain Topography.

[5]  S. Debener,et al.  Visuo-tactile interactions in the congenitally deaf: a behavioral and event-related potential study , 2015, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[6]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  EyeCatch: Data-mining over half a million EEG independent components to construct a fully-automated eye-component detector , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[7]  Tom Eichele,et al.  Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Peter C. Hansen,et al.  MEG. An introduction to methods , 2010 .

[12]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[13]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Does long-term unilateral deafness change auditory evoked potential asymmetries? , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  David Cohen,et al.  EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: Theory and experiment , 2005, Brain Topography.

[16]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Computation.

[17]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. Barkley,et al.  Controversies in neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Pro , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Multiple Bilaterally Asymmetric Cortical Sources Account for the Auditory N1m Component , 2004, Brain Topography.

[20]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[22]  Maarten De Vos,et al.  Cross-modal reorganization in cochlear implant users: Auditory cortex contributes to visual face processing , 2015, NeuroImage.

[23]  Maarten De Vos,et al.  Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials , 2012, Hearing Research.

[24]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[25]  F. D. Silva,et al.  EEG and MEG: Relevance to Neuroscience , 2013, Neuron.

[26]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Auditory cross-modal reorganization in cochlear implant users indicates audio-visual integration , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[27]  Gastone G. Celesia,et al.  Controversies in clinical neurophysiology , 1989 .

[28]  T. Musha,et al.  Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[29]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[30]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[31]  S. Debener,et al.  Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations , 2017, Hearing Research.

[32]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[33]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography , 2014, NeuroImage.

[34]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Debener,et al.  Rapid bilateral improvement in auditory cortex activity in postlingually deafened adults following cochlear implantation , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  R P Crease Images of conflict: MEG vs. EEG. , 1991, Science.

[39]  Claudio Pollo,et al.  Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[41]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 Auditory Evoked Responses Modulated by Spectral Complexity of Sounds , 2007, Brain Topography.

[42]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  P. Nunez,et al.  Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[44]  Jeremy D. Thorne,et al.  Dynamic phase alignment of ongoing auditory cortex oscillations , 2018, NeuroImage.

[45]  Bart Vanrumste,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Review on Solving the Inverse Problem in Eeg Source Analysis , 2022 .

[46]  B. Ross,et al.  Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners , 2009, Hearing Research.

[47]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  On the influence of high-pass filtering on ICA-based artifact reduction in EEG-ERP , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[48]  S. Debener,et al.  Cross-Modal Functional Reorganization of Visual and Auditory Cortex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Identified with fNIRS , 2015, Neural plasticity.

[49]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[50]  Till R. Schneider,et al.  Using ICA for the Analysis of Multi-Channel EEG Data , 2010 .

[51]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[52]  V. Sinha,et al.  Event-related potential: An overview , 2009, Industrial psychiatry journal.

[53]  Jaakko Malmivuo,et al.  Comparison of the Properties of EEG and MEG in Detecting the Electric Activity of the Brain , 2011, Brain Topography.

[54]  C. Baumgartner Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[56]  Stefan Rampp,et al.  Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[57]  Stephanie Clarke,et al.  Automatic and intrinsic auditory "what" and "where" processing in humans revealed by electrical neuroimaging. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  S. Debener,et al.  Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[59]  S P Fitzgibbon,et al.  Surface Laplacian of scalp electrical signals and independent component analysis resolve EMG contamination of electroencephalogram. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.