Assessing collapse safety of CBF buildings subjected to crustal and subduction earthquakes

Abstract The study described in this paper investigated the effects of a mega-thrust subduction earthquake on the seismic performance of moderately ductile concentrically braced frame multi-storey office buildings (MD–CBF) located on Site Class C in Victoria, B.C., Canada. Using data from the 2011 M w 9 Tohoku subduction earthquake in Japan and worldwide crustal earthquakes, nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed on detailed numerical models developed in the OpenSees framework. It was found that the effect of Trifunac duration on the nonlinear seismic response of 4-storey, 8-storey and 12-storey MD–CBF office buildings is particularly significant in terms of the strain accumulated in the fibers of hollow structural section braces causing low-cycle fatigue fracture. In addition, assessment of the likelihood of collapse safety of the studied multi-storey MD–CBF buildings found that the collapse margin ratio ( CMR ) value and the adjusted collapse margin ratio ( ACMR ) value are approximately 150% greater under the crustal record set than under the subduction record set. Among the three buildings studied, only the 12-storey MD–CBF building subjected to the subduction record set failed to meet the collapse safety criterion of ACMR  >  ACMR 10% . Consequently, the CMR value needs to be increased by strengthening the structural system. Therefore, particular attention should be given when designing MD–CBF multi-storey buildings located in the proximity of subduction fault, such as buildings in Victoria that lie within the Cascadia subduction zone.

[1]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .

[2]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Seismic design of steel buildings: Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake , 1996 .

[3]  L. Coffin,et al.  A Study of the Effects of Cyclic Thermal Stresses on a Ductile Metal , 1954, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[4]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Seismic Performance Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames , 2012 .

[5]  Ronald D. Ziemian,et al.  Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures , 2010 .

[6]  Roberto Nascimbene,et al.  Strain Life Analysis at Low-Cycle Fatigue on Concentrically Braced Steel Structures with RHS Shape Braces , 2012 .

[7]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Loss estimation for non‐ductile reinforced concrete building in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: effects of mega‐thrust Mw9‐class subduction earthquakes and aftershocks , 2015 .

[8]  Suhaib Salawdeh,et al.  Numerical simulation for steel brace members incorporating a fatigue model , 2013 .

[9]  S. Dosso,et al.  Site Response in Victoria, British Columbia, from Spectral Ratios and 1D Modeling , 2004 .

[10]  Robert Tremblay Influence of Brace Slenderness on the Fracture Life of Rectangular Tubular Steel Bracing Members Subjected to Seismic Inelastic Loading , 2008 .

[11]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Effects of Seismicity Models and New Ground-Motion Prediction Equations on Seismic Hazard Assessment for Four Canadian Cities , 2011 .

[12]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  IMPROVED ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES , 2012 .

[13]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A State-of-Knowledge Review of the Influence of Strong-Motion Duration on Structural Damage , 2006 .

[14]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response , 2006 .

[15]  S. Manson Fatigue: A complex subject—Some simple approximations , 1965 .

[16]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[17]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .