Blended e-assessment: Migrating classical exams to the digital world

Existing e-assessment tools may not be a panacea to address all assessment situations, as students might find the traditional pen-and-paper approach to provide their answers more convenient than typing them online. For example, constructed response or essay-based assessments will require the active participation of students and lecturers to demonstrate and grade knowledge acquisition, reasoning, evaluation or argumentation. We propose an e-assessment solution that combines mainstream e-assessment features with the classical assessment approach where students write down their responses in paper.This approach supports both grading and access to exams anytime and anywhere. Students attend assessment sessions and are tested the traditional way, but grading, reporting of results, and statistical analysis are performed in the digital world. The proposed approach also provides support to the automated generation of assessment reports, and the administrative management of student grades and their automated transfer to student files. This tool may also be seen as a cost-effective alternative to computer-supported e-assessment, in those cases where the use of computers to perform assessment is not convenient or possible. The tool enables both formative and summative assessment, and also facilitates the transition from classical paper-and-pen-based assessment scenarios to digital ones. The tool has been validated during the last three academic years at University of Vigo, Spain. Highlights? We present a tool combining the paper-pen exams and digital assessment and grading. ? It supports both grading and access to exams anytime and anywhere trough the web. ? It may be seen as a cost-effective alternative to computer-supported e-assessment. ? The tool was validated during the last three years at University of Vigo, Spain.

[1]  C. Dwyer Assessment and Classroom Learning: theory and practice , 1998 .

[2]  Lucía Seguí,et al.  FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AND SELF-REGULATED LEARNING THROUGH ON-LINE TESTS , 2011 .

[3]  Mantz Yorke Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .

[4]  Eva Heinrich,et al.  Onscreen Marking Support for Formative Assessment , 2004 .

[5]  Juan C. Burguillo,et al.  An intelligent tutoring module controlled by BDI agents for an e-learning platform , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  C. Boston The Concept of Formative Assessment. , 2002 .

[7]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[8]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[9]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Robert A. Reiser A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design , 2001 .

[11]  Sally E. Jordan,et al.  e-Assessment for learning? The potential of short-answer free-text questions with tailored feedback , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Dietmar F. Rösner,et al.  EduComponents: experiences in e-assessment in computer science education , 2006, ITICSE '06.

[13]  Heinrich Christian Dippel,et al.  WebSIS - a web based portal with an integrated e-assessment environment , 2008 .

[14]  C BurguilloJuan,et al.  An intelligent tutoring module controlled by BDI agents for an e-learning platform , 2012 .

[15]  Juan C. Burguillo,et al.  TQ-Bot: An AIML-based Tutor and Evaluator Bot , 2009, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Eva Heinrich,et al.  An Investigation into E-Tool Use for Formative Assignment Assessment - Status and Recommendations , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  Aliaa A. A. Youssif,et al.  E-Assessment Tool: A Course Assessment Tool Integrated into Knowledge Assessment , 2008, Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education.

[18]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[19]  Beryl Plimmer A Comparative Evaluation of Annotation Software for Grading Programming Assignments , 2010, AUIC.

[20]  Norbert Pachler,et al.  Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Yevgen Biletskiy,et al.  A semantic approach to expert system for e-Assessment of credentials and competencies , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  J. Noyes,et al.  Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? , 2008, Ergonomics.

[23]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[24]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[25]  Minhua Ma,et al.  A Flexible E-Assessment System Inspired by Design Methodology Management to Accommodate Diverse Learning Styles , 2010 .

[26]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Transforming Education: Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills , 2011 .

[27]  Inmaculada Plaza,et al.  Use of LMS functionalities in engineering education , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[28]  M. James,et al.  Assessment and Learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment , 1997 .