Signal-to-noise models for digital-holographic detection

This paper uses wave-optics simulations to explore the validity of signal-to-noise models for digital-holographic detection. In practice, digital-holographic detection provides access to an estimate of the complex-optical field which is of utility to long-range imaging applications. The analysis starts with an overview of the various recording geometries used within the open literature (i.e., the on-axis phase shifting recording geometry, the off-axis pupil plane recording geometry, and the off-axis image plane recording geometry). It then provides an overview of the closed-form expressions for the signal-to-noise ratios used for the various recording geometries of interest. This overview contains an explanation of the assumptions used within to write the closed-form expressions in terms of the mean number of photoelectrons associated with both the signal and reference beams. Next, the analysis formulates an illustrative example with weak, moderately deep, and deep turbulence conditions. This illustrative example provides the grounds in which to rewrite the closed-form expressions in terms of the illuminator power. It also enables a validation study using wave-optics simulations. The results show that the signal-to-noise models are, in general, accurate with respect to the percentage error associated with a performance metric referred to as the field-estimated Strehl ratio.

[1]  Matthias T Banet,et al.  Digital-holographic detection in the off-axis pupil plane recording geometry for deep-turbulence wavefront sensing. , 2018, Applied optics.

[2]  Mark F. Spencer,et al.  Deep-turbulence wavefront sensing using digital-holographic detection in the off-axis image plane recording geometry , 2016 .

[3]  James R Fienup,et al.  Multiple-plane anisoplanatic phase correction in a laboratory digital holography experiment. , 2010, Optics letters.

[4]  Mark F. Spencer,et al.  Digital holography wave-front sensing in the presence of strong atmospheric turbulence and thermal blooming , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[5]  Jason D. Schmidt,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation With Examples in MATLAB , 2010 .

[6]  Milo W. Hyde,et al.  Fresnel spatial filtering of quasihomogeneous sources for wave optics simulations , 2017 .

[7]  Casey J. Pellizzari,et al.  Demonstration of single-shot digital holography using a Bayesian framework. , 2018, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  James R Fienup,et al.  Correction of anisoplanatic phase errors in digital holography. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Ting-Chung Poon,et al.  Introduction to Modern Digital Holography: With Matlab , 2014 .

[10]  Glen P. Perram,et al.  Deep-turbulence wavefront sensing using digital holography in the on-axis phase shifting recording geometry , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[11]  Abbie E. Tippie,et al.  Phase-error correction for multiple planes using a sharpness metric , 2009 .

[12]  L. Andrews Field guide to atmospheric optics , 2004 .

[13]  Mark F. Spencer,et al.  Digital holography wavefront sensing in the pupil-plane recording geometry for distributed-volume atmospheric aberrations , 2016, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[14]  James R Fienup,et al.  Phase-error correction in digital holography. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  J. Goodman Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Applications , 2020 .

[16]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Phase-error estimation and image reconstruction from digital-holography data using a Bayesian framework , 2017, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.