The Intellectual Sense of Belonging and Self-efficacy in the Introduction to Computer Science Courses at University of Brasilia in Brazil

Research Full Paper Most top universities in Brazil are public government institutions and tuition free. However, until recently, access to these institutions has been limited by extremely difficult entrance exams. The high standards at public universities are in contrast to the k-12 educational system, where public schools fail to prepare students for the exams, with only some of the private schools offering adequate preparation. In 2012, the Higher Education System in Brazil changed: the Quota Law was implemented for all 59 federal public government universities. This law reserves 50% of the enrollments for the public high-school students with the best grades in the entrance exams. Also, from this 50% allocation of places for students from the public high-school system, half are allocated to students from low-income families (up to one and a half times the minimum monthly salary), black and indigenous students. In this context, this paper addresses the research question: "How does the intellectual sense of belonging and self-efficacy of the quota students compare to that the non-quota students’ taking Introduction to Computer Science courses?" We devised a questionnaire for students enrolled in the first programming course of different majors at a top-10 Brazilian university. This paper presents an analysis of the responses that indicates some differences in self-efficacy perceptions between the students admitted through the quota system and the ones admitted exclusively by their placement in entrance exams.

[1]  E. Silva,et al.  Acesso à universidade pública através de cotas: uma reflexão a partir da percepção dos alunos de um pré-vestibular inclusivo , 2005 .

[2]  Erin W. Chambers,et al.  Diversity Across a Decade: A Case Study on Undergraduate Computing Culture at the University of Illinois , 2018, SIGCSE.

[3]  Sarah L. Rodriguez,et al.  Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: the need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory , 2017, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[4]  Marissa K. Hartwig,et al.  Do Gender Differences in Perceived Prototypical Computer Scientists and Engineers Contribute to Gender Gaps in Computer Science and Engineering? , 2017, Sex roles.

[5]  James P. Cohoon,et al.  Analysis of a CS1 approach for attracting diverse and inexperienced students to computing majors , 2011, SIGCSE.

[6]  L. Myers,et al.  Spearman Correlation Coefficients, Differences between , 2004 .

[7]  Andrew Garnett,et al.  Motivation and identity in C++ the effects of music in an engineering classroom , 2016, 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[8]  Legand Burge,et al.  Improving Undergraduate Student Performance in Computer Science at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) through Industry Partnerships , 2015, SIGCSE.

[9]  Angela C. Johnson,et al.  Application of non-programming focused treisman-style workshops in introductory computer science , 2012, SIGCSE '12.

[10]  Frank Gaeth,et al.  PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) , 2005 .

[11]  David C. Howell,et al.  Chi-Square Test: Analysis of Contingency Tables , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[12]  H. Abdi The Kendall Rank Correlation Coefficient , 2007 .

[13]  Denise Wilson,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN SELF-EFFICACY AMONG WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN STEM , 2015 .

[14]  Neil Salkind Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics , 2006 .

[15]  Chris Mayfield,et al.  Evaluating an Alternative CS1 for Students with Prior Programming Experience , 2017, SIGCSE.

[16]  Jennifer M. Blaney,et al.  “But it doesn’t come naturally”: how effort expenditure shapes the benefit of growth mindset on women’s sense of intellectual belonging in computing , 2017, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[17]  Amruth N. Kumar Learning styles of Computer Science I students , 2017, 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[18]  A. Agresti [A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables]: Rejoinder , 1992 .