CRT monitors: Do they interfere with learning?

Research suggests screen reading is slower and possibly less accurate than reading from paper. Six study and test sessions over 10 months examined correct scores and retrieval responses for learning material presented via these two media. Correct scores did not differ suggesting that close matching of material can eliminate any decrement in reading speed or accuracy from screens. However, the way in which knowledge was retrieved varied between the presentational formats. These differences were time related and suggest that repeated exposure and rehearsal of computer-based information is necessary to equate knowledge application with that achievable from hard copy alternatives. It is suggested that this difference might be due to cognitive interference caused by cathode-ray tube (CRT) monitor characteristics of refresh rates, fluctuating luminance, and contrast levels.

[1]  David J. Oborne,et al.  Reading from Screen versus Paper: There is No Difference , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  Daniel Freudenthal,et al.  Age differences in the performance of information retrieval tasks , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  L R Squire,et al.  Remembering and knowing: two different expressions of declarative memory. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Proof-reading on VDUs , 1987 .

[5]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  John D. Gould,et al.  Reading from CRT Displays Can Be as Fast as Reading from Paper , 1987 .

[7]  Jennifer S. Burt,et al.  Memory awareness and schematisation : learning in the university context , 2001 .

[8]  Jefferson M. Koonce,et al.  Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading , 2001 .

[9]  Jan Noyes,et al.  VDT versus paper-based text: reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce , 2003 .

[10]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[11]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  The Effects of Screen Refresh Rate on Editing Operations Using a Computer Mouse Pointing Device , 1995 .

[12]  Rich Picking,et al.  Reading music from screens vs paper , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Tracey Cockerton-Turner,et al.  Evaluation of a hypermedia document as a learning tool , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  Daniel E. Wollman,et al.  Phase locking of neuronal responses to the vertical refresh of computer display monitors in cat lateral geniculate nucleus and striate cortex , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  Cortical visual processing is temporally dispersed by luminance in human subjects , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Effect of luminance contrast on BOLD fMRI response in human primary visual areas. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  An-Hsiang Wang,et al.  Effects of polarity and luminance contrast on visual performance and VDT display quality , 2000 .

[18]  G. Nuthall,et al.  The Role of Memory in the Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge in Science and Social Studies Units , 2000 .

[19]  M J Blanco,et al.  Temporal variation in the luminance level of stimuli displayed on a cathode-ray tube monitor: effects on performance on a visual vigilance task , 2000, Ergonomics.

[20]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Susanne Askwall,et al.  Computer Supported Reading vs Reading Text on Paper: A Comparison of Two Reading Situations , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Experiences of Remembering, Knowing, and Guessing , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Effects of Intermittent Illumination on a Visual Inspection Task , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  Linda A. Martin,et al.  Printing and screen reading in the medical school curriculum: Guttenberg vs. the cathode ray tube , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[25]  K. H. Mild,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potentials to computer monitor flicker. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens , 1982 .

[27]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Paul Muter,et al.  Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: the paperless office revisited? , 1991 .

[29]  Susan M. Belmore,et al.  Reading computer-presented text , 1985 .

[30]  A. Kennedy Eye Movement Control During the Inspection of Words Under Conditions of Pulsating Illumination , 1996 .

[31]  V Barnes,et al.  Reading Is Slower from CRT Displays than from Paper: Attempts to Isolate a Single-Variable Explanation , 1987, Human factors.

[32]  E. Tulving Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[33]  W. Cushman Reading from Microfiche, a VDT, and the Printed Page: Subjective Fatigue and Performance , 1986, Human factors.

[34]  B Bridgeman,et al.  High refresh rate and oculomotor adaptation facilitate reading from video displays. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Doing the Same Work with Hard Copy and with Cathode-Ray Tube (CRT) Computer Terminals , 1984 .

[36]  A. Richardson-Klavehn,et al.  Remembering and knowing , 2000 .

[37]  Roger W. Harris Attitudes towards end-user computing: A structural equation model , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[38]  E. Grandjean Ergonomics of VDUs : review of present knowledge , 1980 .

[39]  J M Gardiner,et al.  Changes in memory awareness during learning: the acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons , 2000, Vision Research.

[41]  Kevin S. Decker,et al.  Manipulating remember and know judgements of autobiographical memories: an investigation of false memory creation , 1998 .

[42]  M. Brosnan,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in computer attitudes and anxieties : the united kingdom and Hong Kong , 1998 .

[43]  Ziggy MacDonald,et al.  WinEcon: An Evaluation , 2002 .