The Effectiveness of Computer Supported versus Real Laboratory Inquiry Learning Environments on the Understanding of Direct Current Electricity among Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ton de Jong,et al. Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[2] David W. Brooks,et al. Reality versus Simulation , 2006 .
[3] Rodger Bybee,et al. Teaching Science as Inquiry. , 1999 .
[4] Mustafa Baser,et al. Effects of Conceptual Change and Traditional Confirmatory Simulations on Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Direct Current Circuits , 2006 .
[5] Ömer Geban,et al. Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding of heat and temperature concepts , 2007 .
[6] E. Burman,et al. Research Guide , 2021, Nature.
[7] Hüseyin Küçüközer,et al. Pre-Service and In-Service Physics Teachers' Ideas about Simple Electric Circuits , 2008 .
[8] Christoph von Rhöneck,et al. A Study of Students' Understanding of Electricity in Five European Countries. , 1988 .
[9] Barry J. Fraser,et al. Classroom environment and student outcomes among students using anthropometry activities in high‐school science , 2007 .
[10] Douglas B. Clark,et al. An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. , 2007 .
[11] Thomas Andre,et al. Use of a Microcomputer Simulation and Conceptual Change Text to Overcome Student Preconceptions about Electric Circuits. , 1992 .
[12] Gerard D. Thijs,et al. Making productive use of students' initial conceptions in developing the concept of force , 1998 .
[13] A. diSessa. Why “Conceptual Ecology” is a Good Idea , 2002 .
[14] C. Chou,et al. Diagnosing students' alternative conceptions in science , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[15] Joseph P. Apkan. Which Comes First: Computer Simulation of Dissection or a Traditional Laboratory Practical Method of Dissection , 2002 .
[16] David Galloway,et al. Conceptual links between Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education and Motivational Style: a critique of Adey and Shayer , 1996 .
[17] Nancy Law,et al. Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift , 2001 .
[18] C. Wieman,et al. PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics , 2006 .
[19] Miky Ronen,et al. Simulation - a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[20] Erminia Pedretti,et al. Closing of the gender gap in technology enriched science education: a case study , 2000, Comput. Educ..
[21] Karyn M. Plumm. Technology in the classroom: Burning the bridges to the gaps in gender-biased education? , 2008, Comput. Educ..
[22] Lara M. Triona,et al. Point and Click or Grab and Heft: Comparing the Influence of Physical and Virtual Instructional Materials on Elementary School Students' Ability to Design Experiments , 2003 .
[23] Sheila French,et al. A response to the critique of gender issues in computer‐supported learning , 2002 .
[24] C. Boyle,et al. Studying conceptual change in learning physics , 1992 .
[25] D. Hestenes,et al. Force concept inventory , 1992 .
[26] Roger Osborne,et al. Towards Modifying Children's Ideas about Electric Current , 1983 .
[27] Ton de Jong,et al. Student‐generated assignments about electrical circuits in a computer simulation , 2004 .
[28] D. Treagust,et al. Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning , 2003 .
[29] Z. C. Zacharia,et al. Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[30] Amos Dreyfus,et al. Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual change - some implications, difficulties, and problems , 1990 .
[31] Mei-Hung Chiu,et al. Promoting fourth graders' conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies , 2005 .
[32] Brian E. Myers,et al. EFFECTS OF INVESTIGATIVE LABORATORY INSTRUCTION ON CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE PROCESS SKILL ACHIEVEMENT ACROSS LEARNING STYLES , 2006 .
[33] Henry Heikkinen,et al. Student ideas regarding chemical equilibrium: What written test answers do not reveal , 1990 .
[34] Gerard D. Thijs,et al. Cognitive effects of science experiments focusing on students’ preconceptions of force: a comparison of demonstrations and small‐group practicals , 1995 .
[35] Noah S. Podolefsky,et al. When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .
[36] Kai Hakkarainen,et al. Patterns of female and male students' participation in peer interaction in computer-supported learning , 2003, Comput. Educ..
[37] Kyunghee Choi,et al. The effects of using the electric circuit model in science education to facilitate learning electricity-related concepts , 2004 .
[38] Lara M. Triona,et al. Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children , 2007 .
[39] David P Maloney,et al. Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .
[40] Bruce L Sherin,et al. Common sense clarified: The role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving , 2006 .
[41] S. Vosniadou,et al. Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science , 2001 .
[42] Xavier Bohigas,et al. A study of second-year engineering students' alternative conceptions about electric potential, current intensity and Ohm's law , 2005 .
[43] Haihong Hu,et al. The Constructivist Planning Self-Reflective Tool (CPSRT): Facilitating a Constructivist Instructional Planning Approach. , 2001 .
[44] Salih Ateş,et al. The effectiveness of the learning‐cycle method on teaching DC circuits to prospective female and male science teachers , 2005 .
[45] Chin-Chung Tsai. Using a conflict map as an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits , 2003 .
[46] Richard Feynman,et al. Goals of the Introductory Physics Laboratory a) , 1998 .
[47] Peter S. Shaffer,et al. Erratum: ‘‘Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding’’ [Am. J. Phys. 60, 994–1003 (1992)] , 1993 .
[48] J. Lochhead,et al. Student conceptions of simple circuits , 1980 .
[49] Lillian C. McDermott,et al. Student understanding of the ideal gas law, Part I: A macroscopic perspective , 2005 .
[50] P. C. Peters. Even honors students have conceptual difficulties with physics , 1982 .
[51] Mustafa Baser. Promoting conceptual change through active learning using open source software for physics simulations , 2006 .
[52] Chun-Yen Chang,et al. Does Computer-Assisted Instruction + Problem Solving = Improved Science Outcomes? A Pioneer Study , 2002 .
[53] Eunhee Choi,et al. Conditions for the effective use of simulation and its application to middle-school physics inquiry activities , 2003 .
[54] Ton de Jong. Computer simulations. Technological advances in inquiry learning. , 2006, Science.
[55] B. Eylon,et al. Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .
[56] Ali Eryilmaz,et al. Effects of Conceptual Assignments and Conceptual Change Discussions on Students' Misconceptions and Achievement Regarding Force and Motion , 2002 .
[57] Thomas Andre,et al. Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity , 1991 .
[58] Daniel T. Hickey,et al. Enhancing Inquiry, Understanding, and Achievement in an Astronomy Multimedia Learning Environment , 2006 .
[59] Jose M. Aguirre. Student preconceptions about vector kinematics , 1988 .
[60] H. Pfister,et al. Illustrating Electric Circuit Concepts with the Glitter Circuit , 2004 .
[61] Hüsamettin Akçay,et al. Effects of Computer Based Learning on Students' Attitudes and Achievements towards Analytical Chemistry. , 2006 .
[62] J. J. Dupin,et al. Conceptions of french pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution , 1987 .
[63] S. Petcharatana,et al. Does computer‐assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process? , 2001, Medical education.
[64] Semra Sungur,et al. The Contribution of Conceptual Change Texts Accompanied by Concept Mapping to Students Understanding of the Human Circulatory System , 2001 .
[65] David Shipstone,et al. A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits , 1984 .
[66] James R. Okey,et al. Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II , 1985 .
[67] Robert J. Beichner,et al. Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits , 2004 .
[68] Christof Wecker,et al. Computer literacy and inquiry learning: when geeks learn less , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[69] Hanna Salovaara,et al. An exploration of students' strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[70] Peter W. Hewson,et al. A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science , 1981 .
[71] F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al. The impact of technology on the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast's sixth grade science classroom , 2007 .
[72] M. Chi,et al. From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .
[73] P. Hewson,et al. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .
[74] S. Çepni,et al. Turkish Students' Conceptions about the Simple Electric Circuits , 2006 .