Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information.

Three studies tested the hypothesis that assimilation of impressions to primed constructs is a product of relatively superficial processing and is unlikely to occur when behavioral information about a target person is processed systematically. In Study 1, the impressions of accuracy-motivated Ss did not assimilate to covertly primed trait constructs, although the impressions of unmotivated Ss did. Studies 2 and 3 showed that when Ss become accuracy motivated after exposure to target information, both retrieval of that information and opportunity for effeortful processing of it were necessary to eliminate assimilation effects. In addition, accuracy-motivated Ss showed no special attention to primes or awareness of their influence on judgment

[1]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Implicit Versus Explicit Impression Formation: The Differing Effects of Overt Labeling and Covert Priming on Memory and Impressions , 1993 .

[3]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. , 1989 .

[4]  Jerry M. Burger,et al.  Desire for Control and the Use of Attribution Processes , 1988 .

[5]  J. Bargh,et al.  Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. , 1985 .

[6]  C. Sedikides.  Effects of Fortuitously Activated Constructs Versus Activated Communication Goals on Person Impressions , 1990 .

[7]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[9]  Shelley E. Taylor.  On inferring one's attitudes from one's behavior: Some delimiting conditions. , 1975 .

[10]  J. Bargh.  Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[11]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Perception without Awareness: Cognitive, Clinical and Social Perspectives , 1993 .

[12]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Implicit Stereotyping in Person Judgment. , 1993 .

[13]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment , 1992 .

[14]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  W. Swann,et al.  Dispelling negative expectancies: The impact of interaction goals and target characteristics on the expectancy confirmation process. , 1988 .

[16]  C. Stangor,et al.  Accuracy and Expectancy-confirming Processing Orientations and the Development of Stereotypes and Prejudice , 1992 .

[17]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Contextual Effects in Hypothesis Testing: The Role of Competing Alternatives and Epistemic Motivations , 1988 .

[18]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[19]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[20]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  The fleeting gleam of praise: cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. , 1990 .

[21]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context , 1989 .

[22]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[23]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  "Saying is believing": Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. , 1978 .

[24]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[25]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[26]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance , 1985 .

[27]  L. Resnick,et al.  Social foundations of cognition. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. , 1991 .

[30]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Health Messages , 1992 .

[31]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .

[32]  F. Strack,et al.  Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast , 1993 .

[33]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[34]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[35]  T. Pittman,et al.  Motivation and cognition: Control deprivation and the nature of subsequent information processing☆ , 1989 .

[36]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[37]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[38]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast , 1993 .

[39]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments , 1980 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[41]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  P. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[43]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[44]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  Need for Cognition and the Correspondence Bias , 1992 .

[45]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  The Law of Cognitive Structure Activation , 1991 .

[47]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[48]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model , 1987 .

[49]  G. Moskowitz,et al.  Spontaneous trait inferences as self-generated primes: implications for conscious social judgment. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[51]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: attenuating the impact of negative expectancies. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. , 1982 .

[53]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. , 1993 .

[54]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[55]  H. Cooper,et al.  The desirability of control , 1979 .

[56]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  G. Weary,et al.  Depression and Social Information Gathering , 1989 .

[58]  S. Fiske.  Social cognition and social perception. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[60]  Darren Newtson,et al.  Selective perception of events. , 1979 .

[61]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[62]  L. Newman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1990 .

[63]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  Denise M. Driscoll,et al.  Uncertainty Orientation and Recall of Person-Descriptive Information , 1991 .

[65]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[66]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[67]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Perceiver self-presentational goals as moderators of expectancy influences: ingratiation and the disconfirmation of negative expectancies. , 1993 .

[68]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[69]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[70]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. , 1986 .

[71]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[72]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[73]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. , 1983 .

[74]  Jerry M. Burger,et al.  Desire for Control: Personality, Social, and Clinical Perspectives , 1992 .

[75]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[76]  L. L. Martin,et al.  Set/reset: use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  The Preoccupational Hazards of Social Life , 1992 .

[78]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Need for cognition and desire for control as moderators of extrinsic reward effects: a person x situation approach to the study of intrinsic motivation. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .

[80]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Effects of Epistemic Motivations on the Use of Accessible Constructs in Social Judgment , 1995 .

[81]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[82]  J. I. Kim,et al.  Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[83]  James L. Hilton,et al.  The Effects of Interaction Goals on Person Perception , 1991 .

[84]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[85]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Accuracy and speed of causal processing: Experts versus novices in social judgment , 1992 .

[86]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[87]  J. Bargh,et al.  The Role of Consciousness in Priming Effects on Categorization , 1987 .

[88]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes , 1980 .

[89]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. , 1990 .

[90]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[91]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Unconscious sources of subjectivity and suffering: Is consciousness the solution? , 1992 .

[92]  J. Bargh.  The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[93]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management , 1992 .

[94]  Automaticity of chronically accessible constructs in person x situation effects on person perception: it's just a matter of time. , 1988 .

[95]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The role of control processes and structural constraints in models of memory and social judgment , 1983 .

[96]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. , 1992 .

[97]  S. Fiske,et al.  Personality feedback and situational norms can control stereotyping processes. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[98]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .