BotCamp: Bot-driven Interactions in Social Campaigns

Bots (i.e. automated accounts) involve in social campaigns typically for two obvious reasons: to inorganically sway public opinion and to build social capital exploiting the organic popularity of social campaigns. In the process, bots interact with each other and engage in human activities (e.g. likes, retweets, and following). In this work, we detect a large number of bots interested in politics. We perform multi-aspect (i.e. temporal, textual, and topographical) clustering of bots, and ensemble the clusters to identify campaigns of bots. We observe similarity among the bots in a campaign in various aspects such as temporal correlation, sentimental alignment, and topical grouping. However, we also discover bots compete in gaining attention from humans and occasionally engage in arguments. We classify such bot interactions in two primary groups: agreeing (i.e. positive) and disagreeing (i.e. negative) interactions and develop an automatic interaction classifier to discover novel interactions among bots participating in social campaigns.

[1]  Hossein Hamooni,et al.  DeBot: Twitter Bot Detection via Warped Correlation , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

[2]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Measuring and Summarizing Movement in Microblog Postings , 2013, ICWSM.

[3]  Abdullah Mueen,et al.  Anomalous Reviews Owing to Referral Incentive , 2017, ASONAM.

[4]  Pablo Suárez-Serrato,et al.  On the Influence of Social Bots in Online Protests - Preliminary Findings of a Mexican Case Study , 2016, SocInfo.

[5]  David G. Rand,et al.  Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Arjun Mukherjee,et al.  Detecting Campaign Promoters on Twitter Using Markov Random Fields , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[7]  Hossein Hamooni,et al.  On-Demand Bot Detection and Archival System , 2017, WWW.

[8]  James F. Allen Natural language understanding , 1987, Bejnamin/Cummings series in computer science.

[9]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Political Bots and the Manipulation of Public Opinion in Venezuela , 2015, ArXiv.

[10]  Vern Paxson,et al.  Trafficking Fraudulent Accounts: The Role of the Underground Market in Twitter Spam and Abuse , 2013, USENIX Security Symposium.

[11]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[12]  Mourad Debbabi,et al.  Spam campaign detection, analysis, and investigation , 2015, Digit. Investig..

[13]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[14]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Content-driven detection of campaigns in social media , 2011, CIKM '11.

[15]  Munmun De Choudhury,et al.  Quote RTs on Twitter: usage of the new feature for political discourse , 2016, WebSci.

[16]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  On Profiling Bots in Social Media , 2016, SocInfo.

[17]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Online Reputation Fraud Campaign Detection in User Ratings , 2017, IJCAI.

[18]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Detection of Promoted Social Media Campaigns , 2016, ICWSM.

[19]  Amos Azaria,et al.  The DARPA Twitter Bot Challenge , 2016, Computer.

[20]  Abdullah Mueen,et al.  Impact of Referral Incentives on Mobile App Reviews , 2017, ICWE.

[21]  David G. Rand,et al.  Implausibility and Illusory Truth: Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News but Has No Effect on Entirely Implausible Statements , 2017 .

[22]  A. Nicole Sump-Crethar Making the Most of Twitter , 2012 .

[23]  Pramodita Sharma 2012 , 2013, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[24]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Bots , 2016, WWW.

[25]  Hossein Hamooni,et al.  Identifying Correlated Bots in Twitter , 2016, SocInfo.

[26]  Anna Maria Di Sciullo,et al.  Natural Language Understanding , 2009, SoMeT.

[27]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter , 2015, CSCW.

[28]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Campaign extraction from social media , 2013, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..