Comfort and performance impact of personal control over thermal environment in summer: Results from a laboratory study

Abstract Field studies suggest that the availability of adjustable thermostats, operable windows and other controls has a positive impact on comfort, the incidence of building related symptoms and productivity. This laboratory study was designed to further investigate how having or not having control over the thermal environment affects human responses to the indoor environment. The study was conducted in summer in a field laboratory that was kept at 28 °C. A total of 23 subjects were exposed twice for about 2.5 h. During the first session (A) subjects were able to fine-tune their local thermal environment at any given time with a personal desk fan with continuous, stepless adjustable control. During the second session (B) subjects still had the desk fans, but this time the fans were controlled from an adjacent room by the researchers who adjusted the individual air speed profiles so they were identical to those recorded during the first session. Thus, each subject was exposed to two customized conditions with identical exposure, only different from a psychological point of view. During the two sessions identical questionnaires and performance tests were used to evaluate subjects' comfort, SBS symptom incidence and performance. As expected, perceived control over the environment was significantly higher during session A, but there were no differences in perceived comfort and SBS symptom intensity. Both self-assessed and objectively measured performance was significantly better during session B. About two-thirds of the subjects indicated to prefer the situation as during the first session when they themselves controlled the air movement.

[1]  P. Ole Fange,et al.  Human requirements in future air-conditioned environments , 2002 .

[2]  David P.Wyon.  Individual control at each workplace: the means and the potential benefits , 2007 .

[3]  E. de Oliveira Fernandes,et al.  Perceived health and comfort in relation to energy use and building characteristics , 2006 .

[4]  Arjen K. Raue,et al.  Robust Design for high workers ’ performance and low absenteeism – An alternative approach , 2014 .

[5]  Walter M. Kroner.  Employee productivity and the intelligent workplace , 1999 .

[6]  Sami Karjalainen,et al.  User problems with individual temperature control in offices , 2007 .

[7]  Gert Boxem,et al.  Occupants’ behavioural impact on energy consumption: ‘human-in-the-loop’ comfort process control , 2014 .

[8]  D. B. Baarda,et al.  Introduction to Statistics with SPSS , 2004 .

[9]  P. A Vroon.  Psychologische aspecten van ziekmakende gebouwen , 1990 .

[10]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  Sick building syndrome, sensation of dryness and thermal comfort in relation to room temperature in an office building: Need for individual control of temperature , 1989 .

[11]  Philomena Bluyssen,et al.  Multicriteria analysis of health, comfort and energy efficiency in buildings , 2005 .

[12]  A. Hwang.  [Thermal comfort]. , 1990, Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse.

[13]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  CHOICE, PERCEIVED CONTROL, AND PERFORMANCE DECREMENTS IN THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT , 1996 .

[14]  Naoe Nishihara,et al.  Indoor Temperature, Productivity, and Fatigue in Office Tasks , 2006 .

[15]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Health and Indoor Climate Complaints of 7043 office Workers in 61 Buildings in the Netherlands , 1992 .

[16]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[17]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables , 1999 .

[18]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[19]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Estimates of Improved Productivity and Health from Better Indoor Environments , 1997 .

[20]  Jørn Toftum,et al.  Indoor air quality and occupant satisfaction in five mechanically and four naturally ventilated open-plan office buildings , 2007 .

[21]  Mglc Marcel Loomans,et al.  Personal control over temperature in winter in Dutch office buildings , 2013 .

[22]  Gail Brager,et al.  Expectations of indoor climate control , 1996 .

[23]  Mglc Marcel Loomans,et al.  Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices , 2013 .

[24]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[25]  V. Noreika,et al.  Environmental Psychology , 2018 .

[26]  Mglc Marcel Loomans,et al.  Modelling personal control over indoor climate , 2012 .

[27]  Gail Brager,et al.  Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort. , 2004 .

[28]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  Field Studies of Indoor Thermal Comfort and the Progress of the Adaptive Approach , 2007 .

[29]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[30]  Jørn Toftum,et al.  Central automatic control or distributed occupant control for better indoor environment quality in the future , 2010 .

[31]  Darren Robinson,et al.  On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants , 2008 .