Second-harmonic generation as characterization tool for Ge/high-k dielectric interfaces

Because the germanium native oxide constitutes a poor dielectric, building metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) gate stacks on Ge requires passivation of the interface between the dielectric and the Ge channel. Different approaches to perform this passivation are available: GeO2 growth prior to high-k depositing, sulphur passivation, etc. The interface properties of these MOS stacks are important, because they determine the electrical properties of the whole structure. Dangling bonds introduce extra energy levels within the band gap, which results in a loss of efficiency in switching a MOS - field effect transistor on and off. Fixed charges near the interface enlarge the voltage needed for switching between on and off state as well. Hence, characterizing these interfaces is a key challenge in semiconductor fabrication. This can for example be achieved using Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) to probe the interface, because SHG is an inherent surface and interface sensitive technique. In this work, we present SHG as an promising surface and interface characterization tool for semiconductors for passivated germanium samples. Different SHG responses are shown for germanium samples with a sulphur passivated Ge or high-k dielectric on top of Si. We show that the oxide layer as such is not probed by SHG and that different bonds over the Ge/oxide interface result in a difference SHG response.

[1]  J. Dadap,et al.  Randomly oriented Angstrom‐scale microroughness at the Si(100)/SiO2 interface probed by optical second harmonic generation , 1994 .

[2]  Lorenzo Pavesi,et al.  Bulk and surface contributions to second-order susceptibility in crystalline and porous silicon by second-harmonic generation , 2001 .

[3]  K. Saraswat,et al.  Germanium MOS capacitors incorporating ultrathin high-/spl kappa/ gate dielectric , 2002, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[4]  Geert Hellings,et al.  Germanium MOSFET Devices: Advances in Materials Understanding, Process Development, and Electrical Performance , 2008 .

[5]  C. Merckling,et al.  Germanium for advanced CMOS anno 2009: a SWOT analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).

[6]  Yves Morand,et al.  The Ge condensation technique: A solution for planar SOI/GeOI co-integration for advanced CMOS technologies? , 2008 .

[7]  R. K. Chang,et al.  Nonlinear Electroreflectance in Silicon and Silver , 1967 .

[8]  Ady Arie,et al.  Three-dimensional ferroelectric domain visualization by Cerenkov-type second harmonic generation. , 2010, Optics express.

[9]  Heinz,et al.  Study of Si(111) surfaces by optical second-harmonic generation: Reconstruction and surface phase transformation. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[10]  Xuezhi Zheng,et al.  U-shaped switches for optical information processing at the nanoscale. , 2011, Small.

[11]  Laura Nyns,et al.  S-passivation of the Ge gate stack: Tuning the gate stack properties by changing the atomic layer deposition oxidant precursor , 2011 .

[12]  Matty Caymax,et al.  Second-harmonic generation reveals the oxidation steps in semiconductor processing , 2012 .

[13]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[14]  Xuezhi Zheng,et al.  Plasmon‐Enhanced Sub‐Wavelength Laser Ablation: Plasmonic Nanojets , 2012, Advanced materials.

[15]  Alain Brun,et al.  Linear and non-linear magneto-optical studies of Pt/Co/Pt thin films , 2001 .

[16]  Michael C. Downer,et al.  Second-harmonic spectroscopy of bulk boron-doped Si(001) , 2000 .

[17]  Theo Rasing,et al.  Magnetization-induced-second-harmonic generation from surfaces and interfaces , 2005 .

[18]  Geoffrey Pourtois,et al.  Mechanisms for the trimethylaluminum reaction in aluminum oxide atomic layer deposition on sulfur passivated germanium , 2011 .

[19]  K. Steinhubl Design of Ion-Implanted MOSFET'S with Very Small Physical Dimensions , 1974 .

[20]  Koen Clays,et al.  Second-order Nonlinear Optical Characterization Techniques: An Introduction , 2009 .

[21]  Gordon E. Moore,et al.  Progress in digital integrated electronics , 1975 .

[22]  H.-S.P. Wong,et al.  Electrical characterization of germanium p-channel MOSFETs , 2003, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[23]  Kurz,et al.  Electronic transitions at Si(111)/SiO2 and Si(111)/Si3N4 interfaces studied by optical second-harmonic spectroscopy. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[24]  David P. Vallett IC Failure Analysis: The Importance of Test and Diagnostics , 1997, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[25]  John E. Sipe,et al.  Second harmonic generation from tetragonal centrosymmetric crystals , 2009 .

[26]  Theo Rasing,et al.  Influence of quadratic contributions in magnetization‐induced second harmonic generation studies of magnetization reversal , 2005 .

[27]  Andre Stesmans,et al.  Interface traps and dangling-bond defects in (100)Ge/HfO2 , 2005 .

[28]  V V Moshchalkov,et al.  Second Harmonic Generation Indicates a Better Si/Ge Interface Quality for Higher Temperature and With $\hbox{N}_{2}$ Rather Than With $\hbox{H}_{2}$ as the Carrier Gas , 2011, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[29]  Bernardo S. Mendoza,et al.  Optical second harmonic spectroscopy of semiconductor surfaces: advances in microscopic understanding , 2001 .

[30]  Wayne H. Knox,et al.  Si/SiO2 interface roughness: Comparison between surface second harmonic generation and x-ray scattering , 1997 .

[31]  O. A. Aktsipetrov,et al.  The origin of second harmonic generation hotspots in chiral optical metamaterials , 2011, 2011 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and 12th European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO EUROPE/EQEC).

[32]  Moss,et al.  Phenomenological theory of optical second- and third-harmonic generation from cubic centrosymmetric crystals. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[33]  Gunter Lüpke,et al.  Characterization of semiconductor interfaces by second-harmonic generation , 1999 .

[34]  John F. McGilp,et al.  Optical characterisation of semiconductor surfaces and interfaces , 1995 .