Differences in the requirements for cryopreservation of porcine aortic smooth muscle and endothelial cells.

One of the basic requirements for the production of tissue-engineered constructs is an effective means of storing both the constructs and the cells that will be used to make them. This paper reports on the cryopreservation of porcine aortic smooth muscle and endothelial cells intended for the production of model vascular constructs. We first determined the cell volume, nonosmotic volume, and the permeability parameters for water and the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) in these cells at 2-4 degrees and 22 degrees C. The following results were obtained: Table unavailable in HTML format. Using a cell culture assay, both cell types were shown to tolerate threefold changes in cell volume, in either direction, without significant injury. Although these data suggested that single-step methods for the introduction and removal of 10% w/w Me(2)SO should be effective, an additional mannitol dilution step was adopted in order to reduce the time required for removal of the Me(2)SO. Following cooling at 0.3, 1, or 10 degrees C/min and storage at less than -160 degrees C, the survival of porcine aortic smooth muscle cell suspensions, measured by a cell culture assay, was inversely related to cooling rate; at 0.3 degrees C/min, recovery was >80%. The survival rate for aortic endothelial cells was directly related to cooling rate over the range tested and was >80% at 10 degrees C/min.

[1]  M. Taylor,et al.  Interstitial ice formation in cryopreserved homografts: a possible cause of tissue deterioration and calcification in vivo. , 2000, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[2]  Michael J. Taylor,et al.  Vitreous cryopreservation maintains the function of vascular grafts , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  M. Robinson,et al.  Rapid electromagnetic warming of cells and tissues , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  R. Gosden,et al.  Osmotically inactive volume, hydraulic conductivity, and permeability to dimethyl sulphoxide of human mature oocytes. , 1999, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[5]  A. Busza,et al.  Cryopreservation studies with porcine corneas. , 1999, Current eye research.

[6]  F. Kleinhans,et al.  Membrane permeability modeling: Kedem-Katchalsky vs a two-parameter formalism. , 1998, Cryobiology.

[7]  D. Pegg,et al.  Fractures in cryopreserved elastic arteries. , 1997, Cryobiology.

[8]  R. L. Sutton,et al.  Devitrification in butane-2,3-diol solutions containing anti-freeze peptide , 1993 .

[9]  D. Pegg Viability assays for preserved cells, tissues, and organs. , 1989, Cryobiology.

[10]  B. Rubinsky,et al.  A mathematical model for the freezing process in biological tissue , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  A. Karow The Biophysics of Organ Cryopreservation , 1987, NATO ASI Series.

[12]  T. Marsland,et al.  Dielectric measurements for the design of an electromagnetic rewarming system. , 1987, Cryobiology.

[13]  D. Pegg Ice Crystals in Tissues and Organs , 1987 .

[14]  M. Taylor,et al.  A new preservation solution for storage of corneas at low temperatures. , 1985, Current eye research.

[15]  M. Taylor,et al.  The effect of ice formation on the function of smooth muscle tissue stored at −21 or −60 °C , 1983 .

[16]  S. Shaw The Frozen Cell , 1970 .