The necessity of follow-up for radiation skin injuries in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions: radiation skin injuries will often be overlooked clinically

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers great benefit that could improve a patient's quality of life. However, numerous case reports of patient radiation injury resulting from PCI are being published, these reports likely represent a small fraction of the actual cases. Purpose To demonstrate the appropriate duration of patient follow-up after PCI to identify radiation effects. Material and Methods We evaluated 400 consecutive PCIs. The radiation dose (dose-area product, cumulative dose, maximum skin dose), number of cine runs, and fluoroscopic time were recorded for all patients. The skin on the patients’ backs was reviewed periodically after PCI. Results Radiation skin effects occurred in six patients from PCI of the right coronary artery in chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients (mild erythema; occurrence rate 1.5%). Skin injury in two patients appeared in cycles. In most cases, erythema was vividly seen at 4 weeks after PCI. Conclusion Careful observation for skin injury is needed. At a few days following PCI, early erythema can be detected through careful observation by well-trained staff. At 7-10 days after PCI, most erythematous pigmentation can be detected. At 4 weeks after PCI, most skin erythema appears clearly, however, some cases of skin erythema occur without back pain. After that, follow-up every 6 months is needed to detect the reappearance of erythema.

[1]  Virginia Tsapaki,et al.  Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  J. Callen,et al.  Fluoroscopy-induced chronic radiation skin injury: a disease perhaps often overlooked. , 2007, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  F. Mettler,et al.  Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 2, review of 73 cases and recommendations for minimizing dose delivered to patient. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  S. Takahashi,et al.  Effect of radiation monitoring method and formula differences on estimated physician dose during percutaneous coronary intervention , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[6]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  N. Kløw,et al.  Radiation-Induced Skin Injury after Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1996, Acta radiologica.

[8]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  F. Mettler,et al.  Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Anchali Krisanachinda,et al.  Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. Takahashi,et al.  Influence of the target vessel on the location and area of maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[12]  Y. Kagaya,et al.  Indicators of the maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention in different target vessels , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. , 2010, Radiology.

[15]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  T. Ishibashi,et al.  Evaluation of patient radiation dose during cardiac interventional procedures: What is the most effective method? , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[17]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of occurrence of skin injuries in interventional cardiac procedures. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  Koichi Chida,et al.  Evaluating the maximum patient radiation dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  T. Ishibashi,et al.  Optimizing patient radiation dose in intervention procedures , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[20]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.