The Structure and Acquisition of Reading II : The Reading Process and the Acquisition of the Alphabetic Principle

Human linguistic communication undoubtedly was originally by ear and by mouth, but men began to communicate with each other also by eye and by hand at least 20 millenia ago. The visual route of communication apparently developed on its own hook for some time, as men drew pictures representing their ideas, on rocks and walls of caves. This protowriting was based on man's natural ability to interpret the visual world meaningfully; it probably involved little or no reliance on concepts from the spoken language. Users of this kind of visual communication were perforce limited by artistic talent and ingenuity in representing all possible notions. Probably in consequence of this inherent limitation, "idea writing" eventually gave way to the representation of words of the spoken language itself; here an infinity of notions could be represented with finite means. But still, the number and variety of words, while finite, is very large, and it is not a trivial matter to think up and memorize a picture for each item. Eventually, writing systems that represented the sounds of speech were invented and came into wide use. Since all utterances can be represented in terms of relatively few speech-sound units, it now became easier to render by eye all those meanings originally conveyed by ear. The usual units of speech transcribed were syllables (as in the Mesopotamian cuneiform scripts). Only very recently, during the first millenium B.C., was the alphabet (a transcription of abstract phonemes) invented. The clear trend in this history, then, has been away from

[1]  Edward L. Thorndike,et al.  The Teacher's Word Book of 30, 000 Words , 2018 .

[2]  S. Sasanuma,et al.  Analysis of writing errors in Japanese aphasic patients: kanji versus kana words. , 1972, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[3]  P. Dale Language development; structure and function , 1972 .

[4]  G. Sperling,et al.  Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a Numeral , 1971, Science.

[5]  S. Fillenbaum,et al.  Memory for Gist: Some Relevant Variables , 1966, Language and speech.

[6]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Explicit Syllable and Phoneme Segmentation in the Young Child , 1974 .

[7]  T. Bever,et al.  The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. , 1970 .

[8]  O Fujimura,et al.  Selective impairment of phonetic and non-phonetic transcription of words in Japanese aphasic patients: kana vs. kanji in visual recognition and writing. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[9]  E. A. Feigenbaum,et al.  The simulation of verbal learning behavior , 1899, IRE-AIEE-ACM '61 (Western).

[10]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language , 1973 .

[11]  Phoenician Go Home? (A Response to Goodman) , 1973 .

[12]  C. Hardyck,et al.  Treatment of Subvocal Speech During Reading. , 1969 .

[13]  J. Downing,et al.  Comparative reading : cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing , 1973 .

[14]  Eleanor J. Gibson,et al.  The ontogeny of reading. , 1970 .

[15]  F. Smith,et al.  The effect of type size and case alternation on word identification. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  A. M. Fasanaro,et al.  [The alexias]. , 1985, Rivista di neurologia.

[17]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  Misreading: A search for causes. , 1972 .

[18]  K. Goodman Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game , 1967 .

[19]  Marcello Barbieri,et al.  On the Origin of Language , 2010, Biosemiotics.

[20]  R. Dykstra AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION ABILITIES AND BEGINNING READING ACHIEVEMENT. , 1966 .

[21]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Teaching Reading by Use of a Syllabary. , 1973 .

[22]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Phonemic Stage Not Necessary for Reading , 1973 .

[23]  E. Shen,et al.  An analysis of eye movements in the reading of Chinese. , 1927 .

[24]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[25]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[26]  O. G. Selfridge,et al.  Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .

[27]  D. Brown Some Linguistic Dimensions in Auditory Blending. , 1970 .

[28]  Frank Smith,et al.  Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read, Sixth Edition , 1973 .

[29]  Michael Duane,et al.  Speech and Reading. , 1970 .

[30]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[31]  Kenneth S. Goodman,et al.  The 13th Easy Way to Make Learning to Read Difficult: A Reaction to Gleitman and Rozin. , 1973 .

[32]  Margaret Floy Washburn,et al.  The Psychology And Pedagogy Of Reading , 1908 .

[33]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[34]  CHILDREN'S CONCEPTS OF LANGUAGE IN LEARNING TO READ , 1970 .

[35]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10 , 1971 .

[36]  E. Gibson,et al.  Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects , 1971 .

[37]  M. Blank Cognitive processes in auditory discrimination in normal and retarded readers. , 1968, Child development.

[38]  T. Bower Reading by Eye , 1970 .

[39]  U. Bellugi,et al.  A comparison of sign language and spoken language , 1972 .

[40]  Jerome Rosner,et al.  Auditory Analysis Training with Prereaders. , 1974 .

[41]  J. Baron,et al.  Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. , 1976 .

[42]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The abstraction of linguistic ideas , 1971 .

[43]  T. Sticht,et al.  Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  E. Thorndike Reading as Reasoning: A Study of Mistakes in Paragraph Reading , 2009 .