Trait perceptions influence economic out-group bias: lab and field evidence from Vietnam

Group favoritism is typically directed toward in-group members and against out-group members, but these cross-group effects often vary. Little is known about why group effects on economic choices vary. We use a survey method developed in social psychology to measure stereotyped attitudes of one group toward another. These attitudes are then associated with prosociality in five experimental games (also using an unusual amount of individual-level sociodemographic control). We present evidence from an artificial field experiment of a majority group with high status (Vietnamese) exhibiting no disfavoritism toward a lower-status out-group (Khmer) and typical disfavoritism to a second out-group (Chinese). Both Vietnamese and Chinese groups see the Khmer as warm but incompetent, attitudes which seem to activate empathy rather than contempt. The results suggest that measuring between-group stereotype attitudes can be used to predict the sign of cross-group favoritism in other natural settings.

[1]  D. Katz,et al.  Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. , 1933 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Experiments in intergroup discrimination. , 1970, Scientific American.

[3]  Colin Camerer,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF A SEQUENTIAL EQUILIBRIUM REPUTATION MODEL , 1988 .

[4]  W. Darity,et al.  Evidence on Discrimination in Employment: Codes of Color, Codes of Gender , 1998 .

[5]  J. Yinger,et al.  Evidence on Discrimination in Consumer Markets , 1998 .

[6]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[7]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Trust and discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach , 2001 .

[8]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[10]  G. Charness,et al.  Relative Payoffs and Happiness: An Experimental Study , 2001 .

[11]  M. Rabin,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS , 2001 .

[12]  Sheryl B. Ball,et al.  Status in Markets , 2001 .

[13]  J. Sobel Can We Trust Social Capital , 2002 .

[14]  M. Carter,et al.  The Economic Impacts of Altruism, Trust and Reciprocity: An Experimental Approach to Social Capital , 2002 .

[15]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity , 2003 .

[17]  Geert Dhaene,et al.  Inter-ethnic trust and reciprocity: results of an experiment with small businessmen , 2004 .

[18]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Third Party Punishment and Social Norms , 2004 .

[19]  L. Vesterlund,et al.  The Effect of Status on Voluntary Contribution , 2008 .

[20]  H. Holm,et al.  Tropic Trust Versus Nordic Trust: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania and Sweden , 2005 .

[21]  A. Todorov,et al.  Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.

[22]  Rick K. Wilson,et al.  Trust in Transitional Societies : Experimental Results from Russia , 2005 .

[23]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Identity and the Economics of Organizations , 2005 .

[24]  I. Bohnet,et al.  Decomposing trust and trustworthiness , 2006 .

[25]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Parochial altruism in humans , 2006, Nature.

[26]  J. Burns Racial stereotypes, stigma and trust in post-apartheid South Africa , 2006 .

[27]  S. Meier,et al.  The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence Using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Social learning in coordination games: does status matter? , 2007 .

[31]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Individual Behavior and Group Membership , 2006 .

[32]  J. Burns,et al.  What's in a name? Racial identity and altruism in post-apartheid South Africa , 2008 .

[33]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Spite and Development , 2008 .

[34]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[35]  E. Fehr,et al.  Caste and Punishment: The Legacy of Caste Culture in Norm Enforcement , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  A Behavioral Account of the Labor Market: The Role of Fairness Concerns , 2008 .

[37]  Yan Chen,et al.  Group Identity and Social Preferences , 2009 .

[38]  Rachel E. Kranton,et al.  Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being , 2010 .

[39]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  Acknowledgements Financial support from the Leverhulme Trust under grant ECF/2003/0352 is gratefully acknowledged. Author Addresses , 2007 .

[40]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences , 2010, Nature.

[41]  Enrique Fatas,et al.  Cooperation and Status in Organizations , 2010 .

[42]  L. Vesterlund,et al.  The Effect of Status on Charitable Giving , 2010 .

[43]  K. Schlag,et al.  Similarities and differences when building trust: the role of cultures , 2010 .

[44]  M. Brewer,et al.  Global Social Identity and Global Cooperation , 2011, Psychological science.

[45]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  Ethnic identity and discrimination among children , 2012 .

[46]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  No third-party punishment in chimpanzees , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality , 2013 .

[48]  Tracy Xiao Liu,et al.  Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation , 2014, Games Econ. Behav..

[49]  E. Fehr,et al.  The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.