Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy

BackgroundWe describe a safe and easily reproducible technique to control Santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) which uses simple digital dissection.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who underwent RRP for clinically localised prostate cancer from November 2008 to November 2010. Santorini plexus was isolated and secured in all patients using a new technique of simple digital dissection in which the index finger is used not to only localize the catheter inside the urethra, but also to develop the right plane between Santorini plexus and urethra. This is obtained by gentle bilateral digital dissection through the lateral aspects of periprostatic fascia which are eventually breached by the fingers, developing a right plane just above the urethra. Santorini plexus is then easily ligated and divided. Indicators of outcomes included estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, operative time, positive margins and complication rates of the technique.ResultsThe maneuver was successful in 53/56 (95%) patients. Mean (range) blood loss and overall operative time for RRP were 620 ml (100–1500) and 130 min. (80–190), respectively. Transfusion rate was 8,9% (5/56). Positive surgical margin rate was 14% (8/56). No complication related to the employed technique was recorded.ConclusionsDigital dissection of Santorini plexus during RRP is simple and easily feasible. It speeds up the process of finding the right plane just above the urethra allowing good haemostasis in the surgical field and proper apical dissection.

[1]  H. Danuser,et al.  A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. , 2011, European urology.

[2]  H. Wise,et al.  Instrument for ligation of dorsal vein complex in radical prostatectomy. , 1993, Urology.

[3]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[4]  R. Cury,et al.  Clinical experiences of delayed contrast enhancement with cardiac computed tomography: case series , 2013, BMC Research Notes.

[5]  C. Rosser,et al.  Blunt apical dissection during anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy , 2009, BMC Research Notes.

[6]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[7]  C. Evans,et al.  Minimising postoperative incontinence following radical prostatectomy: considerations and evidence. , 2006, European urology.

[8]  J. W. Segura,et al.  Technical consideration in radical retropubic prostatectomy: blood loss after ligation of dorsal venous complex. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[9]  P. J. Donker,et al.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. , 1982, The Journal of urology.

[10]  C. Barré Open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, European urology.

[11]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[12]  H. Hricak,et al.  Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship to morphologic features on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Urology.

[13]  P. Walsh Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[14]  T. Kessler,et al.  Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy--does it have an impact on urinary continence? , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[15]  R. Berger,et al.  Combined infrapubic and retropubic ligation of the dorsal vein of the penis during radical retropubic surgery. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[16]  W. S. Warden,et al.  New method to control dorsal vein complex during radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1990, Urology.

[17]  R. Berger Re: Combined Infrapubic and Retropubic Ligation of the Dorsal Vein of the Penis During Radical Retropubic Surgery, by R. E. Berger and R. C. Ireton, J. Urol., 130: 1107-1109, 1983 , 1984 .

[18]  J. Meehan,et al.  Re: Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight into Etiology and Prevention, by Patrick C. Walsh and Pieter J. Donker, J. Urol., 128: 492–497, 1982 , 1983 .

[19]  M. Straub,et al.  New method to improve treatment outcomes for radical prostatectomy. , 2000, Urology.

[20]  Andrea Salonia,et al.  Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2005, European urology.

[21]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[22]  P. Walsh,et al.  An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[23]  J. Borer,et al.  Applied stapling technique in radical retropubic prostatectomy: efficient, effective and efficacious. , 1996, The Journal of urology.